Nonmonetary exchange that lacks commercial substance

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #197384
    NinaSun
    Member

    Bensol Co. and Sable Co. exchanged similar trucks with fair values in excess of carrying amounts in an exchange that lacks commercial substance under U.S. GAAP. In addition, Bensol paid Sable to compensate for the difference in truck values. As a consequence of the exchange, Sable recognizes:

    a. Neither a gain nor a loss

    b. A loss determined by the proportion of cash received to the total consideration.

    c. A gain equal to the difference between the fair value and carrying amount of the truck given up.

    d. A gain determined by the proportion of cash received to the total consideration.

    The answer is “d”. The explanation says “the cash appears to be a minor part of the total consideration”. My question is how to tell this from this question. I was wandering between “c” and “d”. Thanks.

    AUD-74,75 11/2014
    REG-80 04/2015
    FAR-74, 91 11/2015
    BEC-79 08/2015

  • The topic ‘Nonmonetary exchange that lacks commercial substance’ is closed to new replies.