I've heard that Yeager is far more instructive in nature than Becker. I'm using Becker right now (taking FAR on the 27th) and while I have hated every second of it, I think it's probably going to give me a fair shot at passing.
I just wrapped up my final review of the first section of financial and I feel confident. I'll be starting my review of the second section soon. Here's some pros and cons I can think of off the top of my head:
Pros:
– A lot of multiple choice questions and simulations available for you to work on/practice
– Consistent organization throughout the book
– The software can generate a study plan for you
– The “Becker promise” which lets you repeat the course tuition free if you fail
Cons:
– The lectures are boring (but I'm sure that's true of any review course)
– The depth of the questions is significantly more complex than the detail covered in the lectures
– The cost is very high (although depending on your work situation, maybe you have a firm that can subsidize the cost)
I know I probably should be all gung-ho about Becker and talk it up as the best review course because it's starting to work for me, but different things work for everyone and just because so many people tell stories about how wonderful Becker is doesn't mean everyone who uses it will pass. Going into Becker, I was very hyped up about it because my college professors hailed it as if it were some Godly creation–imagine my disappointment when I started to find even the slightest imperfections!
FAR 07/27/11 - 87
AUD 10/01/11 - 85
BEC 11/15/11 - 87
REG 01/03/12 - 92