FAR WACSO problem

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1330137
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Chape Co. had the following information related to common and preferred shares during the year:

    Common shares outstanding, 1/1 700,000
    Common shares repurchased, 3/31 20,000
    Conversion of preferred shares, 6/30 40,000
    Common shares repurchased, 12/1 36,000

    Chape reported net income of $2,000,000 at December 31. What amount of shares should Chape use as the denominator in the computation of basic earnings per share?

    Answer is 702,000

    1/1
    700,000 x 12/12 = 700,000
    3/31
    20,000 x 9/12 = (15,000)
    6/30
    40,000 x 6/12 = 20,000
    12/1
    36,000 x 1/12 = (3,000)

    702000

    So how do you solve it using the other method? I keep getting 708,000

    700,000 x 3/12 = 175000

    680,000 x 3/12 = 170000

    720,000 x 5/12 = 300000

    756,000 x 1/12 = 63000

    175,000 + 170,000 + 300,000 + 63,000 = 708,000

    What am I doing wrong? Thanks.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1330149
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In your calculation, you must weight the 1/1 shares as they are outstanding for the entire year.

    It seems as if you are adjusting the number of shares based on what was sold and increasing or decreasing the total and weighting that number. Never seen it done that way.

    #1330151
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I actually found out what I did wrong. I was supposed to subtract the repurchased shares not add. So instead of 756,000 x 1/12 its 684,000 x 1/12 = 57,000 which gets me the 702,000.

    The becker homework shows 2 methods and then when they show the solutions to the homework they for some stupid reason like to alternate between the two so it's impossible for one to stick. The method I'm using(their method#2) makes more sense to me since it looks at the number of total shares during a certain period of time. The other method seems very backwards to me.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR WACSO problem’ is closed to new replies.