I do not understand why the LTD here would be increased by the carry value-of the old bond- or even why the old bond is still being carried if it were redeemed??? wouldn't you just recognize a loss at the redemption?
A 15-year bond was issued in Year 1 at a discount. During Year 11, a 10-year bond was issued at face amount with the proceeds used to retire the 15-year bond at its face amount. The net effect of the Year 11 bond transactions was to increase long-term liabilities by the excess of the 10-year bond’s face amount over the 15-year bond’s:
A.face amount.
B.carrying amount.
C.face amount less the deferred loss on bond retirement.
D.carrying amount less the deferred loss on bond retirement.
Correct Anser B
new debt would be carried at Face, the old debt would be carried at below Below Face (less the remaining unamortized discount), and the total long-term liabilities would be increased by the discount left, the amount the new 10-year debt carrying value is higher than the carrying value of the 15-year debt.
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2