- This topic has 799 replies, 126 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 14, 2016 at 8:42 pm #836137
jeffKeymasterWelcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for FAR.
If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 29, 2016 at 5:03 pm #1308506
Claudia408ParticipantHi gang, can someone help with this sales leaseback question? My understanding is that sales leaseback gains if recognized are offset against depreciation. This answer indicates it's amortized over the lease term. Which is it or what am I missing here?
On January 1, year 1, Hooks Oil Co. sold equipment with a carrying amount of $100,000, and a remaining useful life of 10 years, to Maco Drilling for $150,000. Hooks immediately leased the equipment back under a 10-year capital lease with a present value of $150,000 and will depreciate the equipment using the straight-line method. Hooks made the first annual lease payment of $24,412 in December year 1. In Hooks’ December 31, year 1 balance sheet, the unearned gain on equipment sale should be:
Answer: According to ASC Topic 840, sale-leaseback transactions are treated as though two transactions were a single financing transaction, if the lease qualifies as a capital lease. Any gain on the sale is deferred and amortized over the lease term (if possession reverts to the lessor) or the economic life (if ownership transfers to the lessee). Since this is a capital lease, the entire gain ($150,000 − $100,000 = $50,000) is deferred at 1/1/Y1. At 12/31/Y1 an adjusting entry must be prepared to amortize 1/10 of the unearned gain (1/10 × $50,000 = $5,000), because the lease covers 10 years. Therefore, the unearned gain at 12/31/Y1 is $45,000 ($50,000 − $5,000).
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8October 30, 2016 at 11:04 am #1308668October 30, 2016 at 11:45 am #1308689
GiniCParticipantC
October 30, 2016 at 7:18 pm #1308827
AScott89ParticipantI don't know if someone's already asked this or not, but does anyone have a good cheat sheet for the investments module in the Wiley book? I thought I understood it okay but I keep missing the questions and getting confused about what effect ‘this company elects/does not elect the fair value option' has on the question.
Can anyone break it down for me? I'd really appreciate it.
BEC-65
AUD-72(8 '14); 68(11 '14)
FAR-
REG-October 30, 2016 at 9:03 pm #1308874
nat.etzyParticipantHi there, I've never used this site before and this is probably a dumb question, but I'm reviewing pensions and wanted to know if a deferred tax asset and deferred tax benefit were the same thing? For example, in simulation 2 using Becker (F6). we have to type in a JE for the CY gains and the JE is:
Pension Benefit Asset – Noncurrent (Dr)
OCI (Cr)
Deferred Tax Benefit (Dr)
DTL (Cr)I think I'm just having trouble with DTA/DTL all around honestly. I skipped over this area when I initially studied each section and now I'm going back through everything to review and study any section I skipped. I just can't seem to grasp how to determine which to record and it's driving me crazy.
FAR – November (11/8) =[
AUD – January
REG – March
BEC – MayOctober 31, 2016 at 11:04 am #1309018
A1lessioParticipantOctober 31, 2016 at 2:13 pm #1309468
accountingisfunParticipantWhat's the feeling on Chapter 10?
I've read through the chapter and skimmed through my notes, last time I completely skipped the multiple choice on the chapter… This time I've done the multiple choice for all but the
“Other Liabilities and Debt Covenants” and “Estimated and Accrued Liabilities” sections in Becker.
For whatever reason those two sections are kicking my butt… Mainly because the questions are causing my eyes to roll and lose focus…
Thinking about skipping practice questions for those two sections…
October 31, 2016 at 3:10 pm #1309513
GiniCParticipant@a1lessio – I feel the same way – and to make it worse, some “life” stuff slowed me down so I don't think I'll even cover all 10 chapters before my exam date. I decided to put my head down and just follow my study schedule – if I squeak through, awesome. If not, there's always Q1. Hopefully I will have the other three behind me at that point so I can just focus on the one set of topics.
All we can do is our best!
October 31, 2016 at 3:17 pm #1309517
GiniCParticipant@accountingisfun – If you did all the IFRS questions I applaud you! I'm working through those now, I'm getting about 10 done per hour. I hate the idea that I might mess up GAAP questions because of working IFRS ones.
Those two sections aren't too bad, if you can spare an hour or so, run through them. I learn something every time I work the questions…
I'm hearing that Governmental and Non-Profit are testing heavily this quarter, so definitely study those.
Good Luck!
October 31, 2016 at 6:10 pm #1309598
jcman240ParticipantHi all, I signed up to take FAR for 1st time at the end of November. Been studying Wiley on and off for past 18 months and a couple weeks ago started with the MCQs here. I am only trending at 55% right now but I can notice that I am getting it more and more and my recent scores are much better than earlier ones… question is what do I need to trend at to feel ok about taking this test? I have read target 85%, not sure I can get there… should i not bother and re schedule my test data if I am not at a certain trending score by 2 weeks out? what kind of trending score are you guys working with leading up to exam day?
Thanks
JOctober 31, 2016 at 6:35 pm #1309607
accountingisfunParticipant@jcman240 – Wiley questions are definitely harder than the Becker ones and overall I feel that both Wiley and Becker were more difficult than what I saw on the actual exam.
Keep chugging away – My first go-around with FAR I averaged a 52% on (very limited number of questions, maybe only 100-200) Wiley questions and a 65% on Becker questions (again limited but more than Wiley) and managed to get a 73…
So if you're getting 55% – it's still possible to do well on the actual exam, but there are definitely areas which you need to brush up on (same applies to me).
For what it's worth I'm aiming for 80% on my Becker practice problems this time around and would be satisfied with a 65% – 70% on Wiley problems (with the major caveat here being I'm in the very small minority of people who isn't doesn't do a ton of multiple-choice questions as I feel I learn more from reading the text book).
Also don't forget this little tidbit on the dashboard of the Wiley Test Bank — “WELCOME to the 2016 Test Bank optimized for tablet. Successful exam candidates regularly score 60 or above on Wiley CPAexcel Test Bank practice sessions.”
October 31, 2016 at 6:47 pm #1309616
emichelle2321ParticipantI am using Becker, I also have the Becker FAR Final Review and am thinking of getting the Ninja FAR MCQ as well – aiming for 3 weeks of review time. Any advice on if this is a waste?? I figure it wouldn't hurt for me to see MCQ's outside of Becker's question bank, but this is my first CPA exam ever, so I just don't know. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
November 1, 2016 at 9:49 am #1309829
mckan514wParticipantI recently read an article on how convergence between GAAP and IFRS is all but dead- will never happen and the SEC has already said “NO” to it– why then are we still being tested on it… grrrrrr (sorry just a morning rant- clearly I am struggling with IFRS this morning 🙂 ).
@emichelle2321- personally I feel like the more MCQ's you can do/ the more you see the material in different formats the better prepared you will be on test day.
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2November 2, 2016 at 2:41 pm #1310776
farhantariq_89ParticipantQ)When there is a change in the reporting entity, how should the change be reported in the financial statements?
I have researched and found that this is the correct answer.
A)Prospectively.Can anyone verify this for me?
November 2, 2016 at 3:07 pm #1310807 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 19’ is closed to new replies.
