FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 8

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #188294
    jeff
    Keymaster

    SO I know every test is different but does anyone have any insight on what has been heavily tested recently? I take the exam Monday and I need to narrow my focus….Thanks!

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 1,629 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #627411
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    Looks like a question related to an inventory sale with $150 paid down, probably $750 will be received in installments.

    First two entries make sense. I don't get $340 on the third one.

    Isn't it suppose to be like this: 900-540=360 (GP) 360/900=0.4 (GP %)

    750 x 0.4 = 300 (to be recognized Y1)

    First year:

    DR: Unrealized GP 450

    CR: Deferred GP 450

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627412
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No, gross profit is recognized in proportion of the cash paid. DGP would be what the 300 that you calculated. I still don't fully get the JE though.

    #627413
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For share based liabilities, the JE when market increases is DR. Compensation Expense CR Liability. What would the entry be if the market decreases? I know expense would be credited, but do you liability?

    #627414
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For share based liabilities, the JE when market increases is DR. Compensation Expense CR Liability. What would the entry be if the market decreases? I know expense would be credited, but do you liability?

    #627415
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    Hmm.. If the shares are not exercised, wouldn't that be an CR:unrealized gain?

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627416
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In the Roger book it said Compensation Expense would be credited. I just don't know what would be debited.

    #627417
    Lidis
    Participant

    Anyone

    Please explain this to me

    In a business combination, the appraised values of the identifiable assets acquired exceeded the acquisition price. The combination is accounted for as an acquisition (initiated in a fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008). How should the excess appraised value be reported?

    A. As negative goodwill

    B. As additional paid-in capital

    C. As an extraordinary gain

    D. As positive goodwill

    Why is an extraordinary item?

    #627418
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Revenue

    Good question. I think you need to ignore the word “extraordinary” and simply focus on the Gain portion of the answer. When you pay less than the F/V of assets, it's a gain. There's no such thing as negative goodwill so both of the goodwill answers are out. Unless the question, specifically, states that stock was used for the purchase, you can ignore the APIC answer. That leaves the extraordinary gain. Like I said, focus on the word “gain” and not the word extraordinary in this case.

    #627419
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Revenue Negative

    From FASB: Goodwill (potentially recognized as extraordinary gain from business combination): If the fair value of the acquired net assets exceeds the purchase price, the excess is allocated as a pro rata reduction of the amounts that would otherwise have been assigned to assets [excludes financial assets other than equity method investments, assets to be disposed of by sale, deferred tax assets, prepaid assets related to pensions and other retirement benefits, and any other current assets]. If any excess remains after reducing assets to zero, it is recognized as an extraordinary gain.]

    #627420
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hey guys! I was supposed to sit for this exam during Q3, but things got a little hectic at work and slowed down my studying a bit. However, I'm back at it! Studying with Becker. I have the NINJA notes, Wiley Test Bank, and Becker Final Review. Hoping to knock this one out of the park on the first try.

    Currently, I'm getting through F6. Pushing really hard to get through all of the material in the next week and a half. Exam is scheduled on the very last day that my NTS is good for so I'm taking it on October 8th.

    Any insight on the best way to get a comprehensive review? What's worked for you on other exams?

    Thanks!

    #627421
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    FAR just gets more and more detailed and difficult…

    #627422
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Question, is the reason stock dividends don't reduce Stockholders Equity because you make credit entries for CS and APIC-CS?

    #627423
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CPAHOPEFUL11, that is the way I've always understood it.

    #627424
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @CPAHopeful — You're reducing your R/E and increasing your C/S (and APIC if stock issuance <25%). Both accounts are equity and thus a wash.

    #627425
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, that's what I figured and just saw the example in the Roger book.

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 1,629 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 8’ is closed to new replies.