- This topic has 1,629 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
OnMyWay732.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:33 pm #188294
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 16, 2014 at 6:11 pm #627992
JuliemiddleMember@CPA2014 – long story short, I didn't study nearly enough. I only went through the review once, didn't really know how to study (it was my 1st attempt at an exam). There was personal stuff happening that distracted me from studying.
I'm actually surprised I even scored a 68…I had pretty much skipped NFP an Govt. Accounting, which is like the cardinal sin for FAR.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 16, 2014 at 7:15 pm #627993
rbozungMemberCan anyone help me on this? When I am going through the NINJA audio, I cannot keep straight when he says “reporting currency” and “functional currency”, each time that he says it below, if he is talking about the Parent's functional/reporting currency or the Sub's functional/reporting currency (since both can have both): (I did all caps where I need clarification). Thanks!
d. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
ii. If functional (PARENT OR SUB?) currency = local currency
1. Asset and liability translation
a. Use the current rate as of the balance sheet date
2. Revenue and expense translation
a. Use the weighted average exchange rate for the current year
iii. If functional currency (PARENT OR SUB?) = reporting currency (PARENT OR SUB?)
1. Foreign currency financial statements are re-measured into the reporting currency (dollar) using the weighted average exchange rate
a. Historical exchange rates (weighted avg)
i. Inventory at Cost
ii. Prepaid assets & PPE
b. Current exchange rates (weighted average)
i. Monetary assets & liabilities
ii. Inventory at market
iii. Trading securities
iv. Deferred taxes
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 16, 2014 at 8:51 pm #627994
rbozungMemberStock Dividends: This just showed up explaining why a question was right “This question is difficult, because authoritative sources and textbooks disagree as to the market value that should be used to value stock dividends. Small stock dividends (less than 25%) are measured at the market value of the stock issued. But the market value can be measured at declaration or at issuance.”
Does anyone know if you use the date of declaration or the date of issuance?
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 16, 2014 at 9:54 pm #627995
JuliemiddleMember@rbozung – For Translation/Remeasurement, you're only looking for the functional currency of the SUBSIDIARY. (The parent always has the Reporting Currency because they're the ones reporting financials of their sub)
Sub's Functional Currency = Local currency of the country the Sub is in = Recording Currency = Translate
Sub's Functional Currency = same as the Parent = Reporting Currency = Remeasure
Sub's Functional Currency = some other foreign currency = Remeasure, then Translate
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 16, 2014 at 10:22 pm #627996
rbozungMemberThanks, Julie. I use to have this mastered back when I used Becker and now I cannot keep it straight! I still do not follow your second note, “Sub's Functional Currency = same as the Parent = Reporting Currency = Remeasure”. To me this looks like the Sub's functional currency is the same as the Parent's functional currency which is also the same as the reporting currency, so I don't see a need for re-measurement in such a scenario…. Unless, the Sub is reporting on their financial statements in local currency and they need to remeasure to their own functional currency?
My brain hurts…
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 16, 2014 at 11:21 pm #627997
JuliemiddleMemberI had the SAME problem when I was learning this. You are assuming the the Recording currency is the same as Reporting currency (why would you re-measure dollars to dollars, right?) But, remember, you've found the Functional currency. The recording currency is still in a foreign exchange. Assume you're dealing with a subsidiary in Switzerland…
Re-Measurement:
Functional Currency = U.S. Dollar
Recording Currency = Swiss Franc
Reporting Currency = U.S. Dollar
Translation:
Functional Currency = Swiss Franc
Recording Currency = Swiss Franc
Reporting Currency = U.S. Dollar
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 17, 2014 at 12:25 am #627998
rbozungMemberThank you! the NINJA notes have re-measurement under Translation and I have always looked at them separately. I think this is where I went wrong. I just need to ignore that part of the notes.
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 17, 2014 at 7:00 pm #627999
JuliemiddleMemberGovt. Accounting question about Estimated Uncollectible Property tax. In CPAExcel it states:
-“Notice that property tax revenue is recognized net of the estimated uncollectible taxes. That is, there is no “Bad Property Tax Expense.”
But, I'm listening to Ninja Audio, and Jeff specifically says (around min. 5 of the Govt. Acct. section):
-“Estimated Uncollectible Property tax revenues do not offset property tax revenues, so don't offset them.”
I'm confused. These statements completely contradict each other, right? I thought recognition is:
DR – Property Tax Receivable
CR – Estimated Uncollectible Property Taxes
CR – Revenue (net amount)
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 17, 2014 at 7:14 pm #628000
rbozungMemberPersonal Financial Statements: NINJA notes: say that BOTH the statement of financial condition and statement of changes in net worth are REQUIRED. CPA excel and Wiley books: Say that Statement of Financial Condition is REQUIRED but Statement of changes in net worth is OPTIONAL.
Does anyone know which is the correct? My inclination is to go with Wiley and CPA excel….
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 17, 2014 at 7:32 pm #628001
rbozungMember@Julie Middle, I think what Jeff means is that there is no expense (bad property tax expense). So no revenues less: expenses. Rather, there is a “contra asset” if you will “Estimated uncollectible taxes” related to the levy “property taxes receivable” and the revenue is recorded at the net amount. I think the point that is being made, is that an expense doesn't show up to net against the revenues when assessing property taxes receivable like it does when you set up an allowance for bad debt account (DR. Bad debt expense, CR AFDA). They skip that accrual and recognition and just net the amount.
Does this make sense? And your JE is accurate.
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 17, 2014 at 7:45 pm #628002
jeffKeymasterOctober 17, 2014 at 7:57 pm #628003
rbozungMemberAwesome. Thanks for the clarification!
BEC - Passed
AUD - Passed
FAR - 10/28/14 (waiting results)
REG - PassedOctober 17, 2014 at 10:15 pm #628004
AnonymousInactiveJust got out of FAR, my first CPA test experience… feel like I flew through the MCQ until mid second testlet where I had to put some thought into my answers. Govt / NFP felt like it was at least 20% of the questions.
And how can I forget to mention the SIMs. Prepare!! I had 1 hour and 50 min left for all the sims and still had to scramble for time at the end. Really try to know your JEs outside of the norm (pensions/bonds).
October 18, 2014 at 1:26 am #628005
AnonymousInactiveThanks agile, your response is similar to many others that have posted, including my own – remember to know Gov't/NFP and know your JE's. Keep repeating and practicing to give yourself the best chance at passing.
DM
October 18, 2014 at 5:53 am #628006
AnonymousInactiveCPA 2014.0 – FAR
Revenue Recognition, Question # 598
Falton Co. had the following first-year amounts related to its $9,000,000 construction contract:
Actual costs incurred and paid $2,000,000
Estimated costs to complete 6,000,000
Progress billings 1,800,000
Cash collected 1,500,000
What amount should Falton recognize as a current liability at year-end, using the percentage-of-completion method?
At year-end, Falton should record an account receivable of $300,000 (1,800,000 – 1,500,000) and inventory of $2,000,000. However, no current liability exists.
Journal entries:
Construction in Progress 2,250,000
Cash and profit 2,250,000
Accounts Receivable 1,800,000
Progress Billings 1,800,000
Cash 1,500,000
Accounts Receivable 1,500,000
How did they get 2,250,000 for the CIP and Cash and Profit? Thanks.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 46’ is closed to new replies.
