FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 91

  • This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by lolo.
Viewing 15 replies - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #765021
    lolo
    Member

    @Just3Letters, the transaction for the initial investment is:
    Dr: investment 400,000
    Cr: cash 400,000

    My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS

    AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    REG - TBD

    #765022
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    I don't know if the dr is to income, but it definitely hit the IS I think the debit must be a premium account (like you would have with a bond). But I am fairly certain the cr is to the investment account – equity earnings increase and amortization on FV in excess of cost decreases.

    For the sake of confusing everyone … we will just remember to subtract out the share of the depreciable asset for income!

    #765023
    lolo
    Member

    The whole thing:

    investment 400,000
    cash 400,000

    investment 60,000
    income 60,000

    income 8,000
    investment 8,000

    Income – 60,000 – 8,000 = 52,000$

    Hope this helps!

    My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS

    AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    REG - TBD

    #765024
    lolo
    Member

    @MaLoTu, I am absolutely 100% sure of what I say!

    My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS

    AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    REG - TBD

    #765025
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    Is that equity earnings- income from investee?

    That helps… I call that account equity earnings, that is where I got mixed up.

    #765026
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    Anyone have an estimate of how long it should take for a full review of FAR before the exam? I am finishing the first pass of the material this week and will start my full review next week. 3 weeks, 4 weeks??

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #765027
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @pony- you should be fine for 5/20 testing. It is really dependent on how comfortable you are with the material. I studied my second attempt at FAR in 12 days and managed a 70… This time I am playing it by ear and going much slower than I anticipated.

    #765028
    lolo
    Member

    @MaLoTu, Exactly!

    @Pony Boy, I think FAR should take at least 6 weeks!

    My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS

    AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
    REG - TBD

    #765029
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    The review itself should take around 6 weeks or 6 weeks from start to finish? I have heard of reviewing anywhere from 2 weeks to 5 weeks.

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #765030
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @Pony – how many gaps do you have? I would never study for longer than 6-7 weeks in total because my short term memory just wont hold the earlier learned stuff that long! What does your gut tell you?

    #765031
    Pony Boy
    Participant

    Pushed it back to the first week of June, so I should have right at 4/ 4.5 weeks of review. I am finishing F10 of Becker (the last section) this week. I am thinking 4-5 weeks should be enough, but I will have a tight review schedule for that period.

    REG (02/2016)- PASS
    BEC (04/2016)- PASS
    FAR (06/2016)- PASS
    AUD (08/2016)-

    "Stay Gold, PonyBoy, Stay Gold"

    #765032
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Can somebody with a better understanding of partnerships explain this to me? I get the difference methods of admitting partners, but liquidation kills me. Also, any easy ways you guy go about doing partnership liquidation? Thanks!

    The following condensed balance sheet is presented for the partnership of Alfa and Beda, who share profits and losses in the ratio of 60:40, respectively:

    Cash $ 45,000
    Other assets 625,000
    Beda (loan) 30,000
    ——–
    $700,000
    ========
    Accounts payable $120,000
    Alfa (capital) 348,000
    Beda (capital) 232,000
    ——–
    $700,000
    ========
    Instead of admitting a new partner, Alfa and Beda decide to liquidate the partnership. If the other assets are sold for $500,000, what amount of the available cash should be distributed to Alfa?

    A.
    $255,000

    B.
    $273,000

    C.
    $327,000

    D.
    $348,000

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #765033
    marqzho
    Participant

    273?

    Other Asset sold for a loss. So profit & loss ratio kicks in.

    500-625 = -125 *60% = -75

    A Capital = 348 – 75 = 273

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #765034
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Marqzho,

    273 is correct. I actually get it now too! I just wasn't thinking about the partnership assets as actually being true assets sold for a loss.

    Anyways, much better now 🙂

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #765035
    Paras316
    Participant

    if the operating leverage is 8 and increase in sales is 19%, what will be the increase in NOI? Please advise.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 91’ is closed to new replies.