FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 88

Viewing 15 replies - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #764976
    patelhj1
    Participant

    Also should I really be worried about this bonus questions, whats the likely hood of it showing up? Did anyone have similar question on their test experience?

    BEC 78 08/2015
    REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
    FAR 75! 5/2016
    AUD ? 8/2016

    Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
    Google most difficult professional exam

    #764977
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @patelhj1 – I hate that problem … I got 60k doing some random algebraic calculation, but have no idea if it is right!

    #764978
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    Marketable securities:

    I selected D because you have to mark the A4S security to market value, which is a decrease and then the IS would have a realized loss which is also a decrease. However the answer is B, is it no effect on A4S security because it would have went down regardless of the temporary or permanent loss? Am I missing something?

    On both December 31, Year 1, and December 31, Year 2, Kopp Co.'s only marketable equity security had the same market value, which was below cost. Kopp considered the decline in value to be temporary in Year 1 but other than temporary in Year 2. At the end of both years the security was classified as an available-for-sale asset. Kopp could not exercise significant influence over the investee. What should be the effects of the determination that the decline was other than temporary on Kopp's Year 2 net available-for-sale assets and net income?
    a. Decrease in net available-for-sale assets and no effect on net income.
    b. No effect on net available-for-sale assets and decrease in net income.
    c. No effect on both net available-for-sale assets and net income.
    d. Decrease in both net available-for-sale assets and net income.

    Explanation

    Choice “b” is correct. In Year 1, the security would be written down to fair value. The unrealized holding loss would be reported in other comprehensive income. In Year 2, the unrealized holding loss would be removed from accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings as a realized loss since the decline is classified as other than temporary in Year 2. This Year 2 entry has no effect on available-for-sale assets and decreases net income by the amount of the realized loss.

    #764979
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Bonus = 10% (pretax- bonus)
    We know 360 is the after tax so pretax is 360000/.6 = 600,000 * 10% = 60k.

    BEC- PASS

    #764980
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Patel,

    These bonus questions are tricky. Just do Algebra. Trust me.

    For this question: We need to find out what 10% of income before tax but after bonus deduction:

    Yay algebra:

    X * (1 – 0.4) = 360,000
    0.6*X=360,000
    360,000/0.6= 600,000

    600,000 * 0.1 = 60,000

    Is B the answer?

    Also, Gearty apparently believes that lots of people see these bonus questions on exam

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764981
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    I know that extra-ordinary items are gone now, but I didn't think anything else made since. Why is a donation of land treated as APIC? It has nothing to do with equity…

    Pine City owned a vacant plot of land zoned for industrial use. Pine gave this land to Medi Corp. solely as an incentive for Medi to build a factory on the site. The land had a fair value of $300,000 at the date of the gift. This nonmonetary transaction should be reported by Medi as:

    Incorrect A.
    extraordinary income.

    B.
    additional paid-in capital.

    C.
    a credit to retained earnings.

    D.
    a memorandum entry.

    Correct answer is B, APIC.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764982
    ImCPA
    Participant

    Can anyone suggest on likelihood of getting Retail Inventory LIFO/FIFO questions? Did anyone of you saw those coming on exams?

    FAR - 85 (5/10/2016)
    AUD - 89 (7/12/2016)
    BEC - 9/07/2016
    REG - TBD

    #764983
    Claudia408
    Participant

    i didn't see any LIFO/FIFO. my opinion is, the exam is changing and those questions are too “easy” to ask, you might see one or two in MCQ but that's it.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764984
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Yeah I agree. I don't expect many inventory valuation MCQ. I mean, I hope I get them, but I doubt it. Maybe some moving average inventory or retail inventory because those can require multiple calculations. However, none of us really know because there are thousands of possible questions they have ready to get us with and anybody commenting in this message board only has 90 questions to sample…

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764985
    KJ
    Participant

    7. A transportation company purchased a passenger bus for $100,000 on January 1, year 1. The company expects the bus to be used for 20 years if it follows a maintenance schedule of replacing the engine after 10 years and replacing the seats every eight years. It estimates that the current cost to replace the engine is $25,000 and the current cost to replace the seats is $10,000. The company uses straight-line depreciation and the bus has no residual value. The company considers any component equal to or greater than 10% of the overall cost to be significant. Under IFRS, how much depreciation expense should the company recognize for the bus for the year ended December 31, year 1?

    A. $5,000 B. $7,000 C. $7,250 D. $8,500

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764986
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Kanwal, IFRS uses component depreciation so you have to “take apart” the asset for individual depreciation.

    Bus (100,000) – engine (25,000) – seats (10,000) = 65,000 / 20 = 3250

    25,000 / 20 = 1250

    10,000 / 20 = 500

    3250 + 1250 + 500 = 5000 annual depreciation. A.

    The questions I have seen like this have different useful lives for each component. So watch out for that.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764987
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Now my turn. Why does this question seem to think that we recognize a 1000 gain on the non-monetary transaction. When we pay cash (boot), we don't recognize any gain. I put 0 but they think it is 1000 gain…

    Pickup truck exchanged for a new pickup truck
    Original cost of truck $24,000
    Accumulated depreciation of truck 21,000
    Sticker price of new truck 27,000
    Fair market value of the new truck 25,500
    Cash paid to dealer 21,500
    Gain or loss recognized

    Answer: 1000
    My answer: 0

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764988
    KJ
    Participant

    Answer for my question is B.

    For your question, I think this will be the entry:

    Dr. FV New Truck 25,500
    Dr. Accum Depr Old Truck 21000
    Cr. Cash 21,500
    Cr. Old Truck 24000
    Cr. Gain 1000

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764989
    KJ
    Participant

    Bus = 65000/20 = 3250

    Engine 25000/10 = 2500

    Seats 10,000/8 = 1250

    3250 + 1250 + 2500 = 7,000

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764990
    KJ
    Participant

    I also said 5,000 but I realized seats are for 8 years and Engine for 10 years.

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

Viewing 15 replies - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 88’ is closed to new replies.