- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 3, 2016 at 7:54 pm #764976
patelhj1ParticipantAlso should I really be worried about this bonus questions, whats the likely hood of it showing up? Did anyone have similar question on their test experience?
BEC 78 08/2015
REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
FAR 75! 5/2016
AUD ? 8/2016Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
Google most difficult professional examMay 3, 2016 at 8:24 pm #764977
MaLoTuParticipant@patelhj1 – I hate that problem … I got 60k doing some random algebraic calculation, but have no idea if it is right!
May 3, 2016 at 8:40 pm #764978
MaLoTuParticipantMarketable securities:
I selected D because you have to mark the A4S security to market value, which is a decrease and then the IS would have a realized loss which is also a decrease. However the answer is B, is it no effect on A4S security because it would have went down regardless of the temporary or permanent loss? Am I missing something?
On both December 31, Year 1, and December 31, Year 2, Kopp Co.'s only marketable equity security had the same market value, which was below cost. Kopp considered the decline in value to be temporary in Year 1 but other than temporary in Year 2. At the end of both years the security was classified as an available-for-sale asset. Kopp could not exercise significant influence over the investee. What should be the effects of the determination that the decline was other than temporary on Kopp's Year 2 net available-for-sale assets and net income?
a. Decrease in net available-for-sale assets and no effect on net income.
b. No effect on net available-for-sale assets and decrease in net income.
c. No effect on both net available-for-sale assets and net income.
d. Decrease in both net available-for-sale assets and net income.Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. In Year 1, the security would be written down to fair value. The unrealized holding loss would be reported in other comprehensive income. In Year 2, the unrealized holding loss would be removed from accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings as a realized loss since the decline is classified as other than temporary in Year 2. This Year 2 entry has no effect on available-for-sale assets and decreases net income by the amount of the realized loss.
May 3, 2016 at 8:45 pm #764979
Spartans92ParticipantBonus = 10% (pretax- bonus)
We know 360 is the after tax so pretax is 360000/.6 = 600,000 * 10% = 60k.BEC- PASS
May 3, 2016 at 8:52 pm #764980
Just3LettersParticipantPatel,
These bonus questions are tricky. Just do Algebra. Trust me.
For this question: We need to find out what 10% of income before tax but after bonus deduction:
Yay algebra:
X * (1 – 0.4) = 360,000
0.6*X=360,000
360,000/0.6= 600,000600,000 * 0.1 = 60,000
Is B the answer?
Also, Gearty apparently believes that lots of people see these bonus questions on exam
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDMay 3, 2016 at 10:09 pm #764981
Just3LettersParticipantI know that extra-ordinary items are gone now, but I didn't think anything else made since. Why is a donation of land treated as APIC? It has nothing to do with equity…
Pine City owned a vacant plot of land zoned for industrial use. Pine gave this land to Medi Corp. solely as an incentive for Medi to build a factory on the site. The land had a fair value of $300,000 at the date of the gift. This nonmonetary transaction should be reported by Medi as:
Incorrect A.
extraordinary income.B.
additional paid-in capital.C.
a credit to retained earnings.D.
a memorandum entry.Correct answer is B, APIC.
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDMay 3, 2016 at 11:23 pm #764982
ImCPAParticipantCan anyone suggest on likelihood of getting Retail Inventory LIFO/FIFO questions? Did anyone of you saw those coming on exams?
FAR - 85 (5/10/2016)
AUD - 89 (7/12/2016)
BEC - 9/07/2016
REG - TBDMay 3, 2016 at 11:25 pm #764983
Claudia408Participanti didn't see any LIFO/FIFO. my opinion is, the exam is changing and those questions are too “easy” to ask, you might see one or two in MCQ but that's it.
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8May 3, 2016 at 11:43 pm #764984
Just3LettersParticipantYeah I agree. I don't expect many inventory valuation MCQ. I mean, I hope I get them, but I doubt it. Maybe some moving average inventory or retail inventory because those can require multiple calculations. However, none of us really know because there are thousands of possible questions they have ready to get us with and anybody commenting in this message board only has 90 questions to sample…
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDMay 4, 2016 at 12:01 am #764985
KJParticipant7. A transportation company purchased a passenger bus for $100,000 on January 1, year 1. The company expects the bus to be used for 20 years if it follows a maintenance schedule of replacing the engine after 10 years and replacing the seats every eight years. It estimates that the current cost to replace the engine is $25,000 and the current cost to replace the seats is $10,000. The company uses straight-line depreciation and the bus has no residual value. The company considers any component equal to or greater than 10% of the overall cost to be significant. Under IFRS, how much depreciation expense should the company recognize for the bus for the year ended December 31, year 1?
A. $5,000 B. $7,000 C. $7,250 D. $8,500
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
May 4, 2016 at 12:15 am #764986
Just3LettersParticipantKanwal, IFRS uses component depreciation so you have to “take apart” the asset for individual depreciation.
Bus (100,000) – engine (25,000) – seats (10,000) = 65,000 / 20 = 3250
25,000 / 20 = 1250
10,000 / 20 = 500
3250 + 1250 + 500 = 5000 annual depreciation. A.
The questions I have seen like this have different useful lives for each component. So watch out for that.
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDMay 4, 2016 at 12:17 am #764987
Just3LettersParticipantNow my turn. Why does this question seem to think that we recognize a 1000 gain on the non-monetary transaction. When we pay cash (boot), we don't recognize any gain. I put 0 but they think it is 1000 gain…
Pickup truck exchanged for a new pickup truck
Original cost of truck $24,000
Accumulated depreciation of truck 21,000
Sticker price of new truck 27,000
Fair market value of the new truck 25,500
Cash paid to dealer 21,500
Gain or loss recognizedAnswer: 1000
My answer: 0FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDMay 4, 2016 at 12:40 am #764988
KJParticipantAnswer for my question is B.
For your question, I think this will be the entry:
Dr. FV New Truck 25,500
Dr. Accum Depr Old Truck 21000
Cr. Cash 21,500
Cr. Old Truck 24000
Cr. Gain 1000FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
May 4, 2016 at 12:43 am #764989
KJParticipantBus = 65000/20 = 3250
Engine 25000/10 = 2500
Seats 10,000/8 = 1250
3250 + 1250 + 2500 = 7,000
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
May 4, 2016 at 12:44 am #764990
KJParticipantI also said 5,000 but I realized seats are for 8 years and Engine for 10 years.
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 88’ is closed to new replies.
