FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 69

Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #764691
    mckan514w
    Participant

    OMG Reg is so boring I can feel my brain melting– thought I would pop in here just to liven things up in my life (wow now that sounds sad and pathetic)- and check out how all you guys are doing! You got this thing Just3 and Claudia!! And Spartan your gonna kick yourself when you find out you passed and spent all this time hanging here rather than BEC! ha ha ha… Good luck all- back to contract law…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #764692
    marqzho
    Participant

    mckan514w

    FAR is FAR more interesting than REG IMO. Yes, FAR has a lot of material, but they make sense. REG doesn't make sense to me.

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #764693
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Nice to see you again Mckan,

    I'll be in the Reg chat room here in a few weeks to liven things up over there:) They don't know what they're missing with their boring chat room

    …fortunately I'm one of those losers that actually really enjoyed business law classes in school

    Hopefully that embarrassing fact helps me!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764694
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Spartans – Thank you! Yes it's very confusing! At first I wasn't remembering to weight the shares for EPS and now I'm thinking every time I see it have to weight it! Studying full time can also be hard bc who can really focus on this stuff for 8-10 hours a day!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764695
    Zyx
    Participant

    I agreed with marqzho that far is more interesting than reg. I enjoy studying far. I don't hate reg and I think if you think like uncle Sam, reg makes sense 😉 How do you guys study for journal entries? I have to read textbooks but cannot remember all like governmental accounting. I work in financial accounting and deal with journal entries regularly
    but I don't work for the government I don't know if I know enough governmental accounting to pass far.

    REG: 77 x2
    BEC: 81 x3
    FAR: 68 retake 10/1
    AUD: 8/27

    #764696
    Claudia408
    Participant

    zyx – i think for govt you can probably memorize most JEs bc they are always the same and the questions ask the topics over and over: budgetary, closing budgetary, encumbrance, revenue…

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764697
    Stilgoin
    Participant

    A municipality that uses modified accrual and encumbrance accounting would use which of the following funds to account for agency fund cash?

    A.
    A fiduciary fund

    B.
    A proprietary fund

    C.
    The general fund

    D.
    A special assessment fund

    B | 62, 78
    A | 73, 67, 79
    R | 82
    F | 59, 59, Waiting

    Ethics | 93

    "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
    ~Winston Churchill

    “In a world full of critics, be an encourager."

    #764698
    Claudia408
    Participant

    C?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764699
    Stilgoin
    Participant

    That’s what I thought because it said modified accrual, but supposedly the answer is A. Here is the explanation:

    Agency funds are one of the fund types comprising the “Fiduciary Funds.” Only resources held for the benefit of others are reported in fiduciary funds. The other fiduciary funds are pension trust funds, investment trust funds, and private-purpose trust funds. (GASB 1300.102)

    That explanation gave me no satisfaction. I wonder if the question is stated wrong? Fiduciary is full accrual……….grrrrrrrr

    B | 62, 78
    A | 73, 67, 79
    R | 82
    F | 59, 59, Waiting

    Ethics | 93

    "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
    ~Winston Churchill

    “In a world full of critics, be an encourager."

    #764700
    Claudia408
    Participant

    tricky, so messed up! i bet hella people get that wrong!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764701
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Hurry on over Just3!! and yes like you I actually really liked business law and I LOVE taxes 🙂 so I am actually “getting Reg” but it is tedious 🙂 Glad everyone over here is doing well and progressing nicely…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #764702
    Claudia408
    Participant

    mckan514w – will join Reg study group next week!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764703
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Haha it is great to see some familiar users in the study group! Feel like a graduating class or something LMAO. Mckan, I thought the same too but I always think what if I didnt pass lol and then I'll be glad for sticking around so I can study less intensive for the retake 🙂 (kinda).

    Stilgoin, I first thought A because I saw agency funds which are your PAPI funds (private purpose, agency, pension, investment) but then I saw modified accrual and instantly went general. ARGH!! I guess the key is AGENCY trust fund the other info is to throw you off.

    BEC- PASS

    #764704
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Not looking forward to REG since it contains a lot of rules. The phase out deduction and the AMT all that stuff :/

    BEC- PASS

    #764705
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Just took my second practice exam for Becker.. .81% this time!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

Viewing 15 replies - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 69’ is closed to new replies.