- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 22, 2016 at 4:57 pm #764541
Claudia408Participanti think my Roger review course covered govt cash flows kinda crappy… so i'm trying to figure out how different it is versus private.
only proprietary funds have a CF stmt
operating: loans, interest & dividends received, grants, salaries, contribution revenue ( is that right? i have conflicting info)
investing: investments acquires/sold, PPE acquired/sold
financing: interest paid, proceeds from restricted contributions, perm restricted revenue,that's all i got out of it, lol
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8April 22, 2016 at 5:26 pm #764542
ABTX411ParticipantHere is a great resource for government cash flows. Look at pages 6-12 in particular. (page #s at the bottom of each page, not the pg #s according to adobe acrobat.)
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 5:57 pm #764543
Spartans92ParticipantHaha that is great ABTX. I enjoy learning from people. We all have our own strengths and its great to see things in a different perspective. 2 more hours until this BEAST!
BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 6:17 pm #764544
Just3LettersParticipantYou got this Spartans!!!
On November 1, Year 1, Davis Co. Discounted with recourse at 10% a one-year, non-interest bearing 20,500 note receivable maturing on January 31, Year 2. What amount of contingent liability for this note must Davis disclose in it's financial statement for the year ended December 31, Year 1?
A. 20,500
B. 20,000
C. 20,333
D. 0I said 0. I don't understand how this is a “contingent” liability. It doesn't seem like the liability is contingent on anything. Davis will clearly have to pay the liability next year. It's a pretty concrete liability from my perspective.
Anyways, I'm wrong. The answer is A. Can somebody please explain?
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 22, 2016 at 6:20 pm #764545
Spartans92ParticipantApril 22, 2016 at 6:25 pm #764546
ABTX411Participant“Discounted with recourse” means that Davis went to bank and essentially sold the receivable to them. Davis was in need of cash now and didn't want to wait for the bank to pay, so they received the cash from the bank instead of the customer (net of a 10% discount). This action would dr. cash and cr. notes receivable. HOWEVER – there is recourse, so the bank could come back to Davis to recover any amount that the customer does not pay IF the customer defaults on the note. For this reason, Davis is contingently liable to the bank for any amount that the customer doesn't pay, up to the full amount of the note.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 6:25 pm #764547
Just3LettersParticipantSpartans, confidence is super important! It's gotten me through many exams in my life.
I get that you are liable with recourse liabilities. I just don't understand why this is contingent on anything. Wouldn't the question be the exact same if the word contingent was never even mentioned in the question?
OHHH I get it! Thanks ABTX!
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 22, 2016 at 6:29 pm #764548
ABTX411ParticipantIn Wiley, one of the lecturers responded to someone’s question basically telling them that he has NEVER seen an exam question that intentionally set out to blatantly trick the test taker with vocabulary technicality and a “$0†answer. So in this case, you can safely assume that the use of the term contingent liability is correct.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 6:32 pm #764549
Spartans92ParticipantGreat explanation ABTX! This is what I mean haha. Sometimes we understand but not fully I guess. LOL
BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 6:40 pm #764550
ABTX411ParticipantNo prob! I think we have to keep in mind that while the AICPA will do their best to write their questions appropriately, when it comes down to it, we are accountants, not English teachers, and the occasional grammatical issue or wording inconsistency will slip through on a test. It can make some questions sound iffy – like they are trying to trick you. Try not to get hung up on that kind of stuff. It'll slow you down and make you waste time.
GOOD LUCK TODAY!!! You've got this. Be careful to save enough time for your SIMs, and carefully read through all of the info in any extra tabs that they provide. You've got this!
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 6:46 pm #764551
Spartans92ParticipantThanks, I will keep that in mind. That was my issue with AUD I didn't practice enough and on exam I was nervous when I saw a complete extra tab of info. Ill post on here later tonight or tomorrow morning. 🙂
BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 6:50 pm #764552
Claudia408ParticipantABTX411 – thanks that is very comprehensive.
Just3 – that question sounds like it's from REG!
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8April 22, 2016 at 7:34 pm #764553
Just3LettersParticipantThis is the worst day of studying for me. I am just not able to focus at all… Somebody fix me!
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 22, 2016 at 7:38 pm #764554
Spartans92ParticipantLast minute question:
Pugh Co. reported the following in its statement of stockholders' equity on January 1 of the current year:Common stock, $5 par value, authorized 200,000 shares, issued 100,000 shares $ 500,000
Additional paid-in capital 1,500,000
Retained earnings 516,000
Total 2,516,000
Less treasury stock, at cost, 5,000 shares (40,000)
Total stockholders' equity $ 2,476,000The following events occurred during the current year:
May 1 – 1,000 shares of treasury stock were sold for $10,000.
July 9 – 10,000 shares of previously unissued common stock were sold for $12 per share.
October 1 – The distribution of a 2-for-1 stock split resulted in the common stock's per share par value being halved.Pugh accounts for treasury stock under the cost method. Laws in the state of Pugh's incorporation protect shares held in treasury from dilution when stock dividends or stock splits are declared.
The number of outstanding common shares at December 31 should be:
a. 212,000
b. 222,000
c. 216,000
d. 220,000Why is the treasury stock sold (1000) an add? I thought it reduces CS outstanding, hence, a subtract?
NVM LOL.. I got this after googling haha. Jeez, think I am just nervous! Well..this is it time to head in the center.BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 7:44 pm #764555
Just3LettersParticipant/
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBD -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 59’ is closed to new replies.
