FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 59

Viewing 15 replies - 871 through 885 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #764541
    Claudia408
    Participant

    i think my Roger review course covered govt cash flows kinda crappy… so i'm trying to figure out how different it is versus private.

    only proprietary funds have a CF stmt
    operating: loans, interest & dividends received, grants, salaries, contribution revenue ( is that right? i have conflicting info)
    investing: investments acquires/sold, PPE acquired/sold
    financing: interest paid, proceeds from restricted contributions, perm restricted revenue,

    that's all i got out of it, lol

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764542
    ABTX411
    Participant

    Here is a great resource for government cash flows. Look at pages 6-12 in particular. (page #s at the bottom of each page, not the pg #s according to adobe acrobat.)

    https://www.gasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&blobwhere=1175824063084&blobheader=application/pdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764543
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Haha that is great ABTX. I enjoy learning from people. We all have our own strengths and its great to see things in a different perspective. 2 more hours until this BEAST!

    BEC- PASS

    #764544
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    You got this Spartans!!!

    On November 1, Year 1, Davis Co. Discounted with recourse at 10% a one-year, non-interest bearing 20,500 note receivable maturing on January 31, Year 2. What amount of contingent liability for this note must Davis disclose in it's financial statement for the year ended December 31, Year 1?

    A. 20,500
    B. 20,000
    C. 20,333
    D. 0

    I said 0. I don't understand how this is a “contingent” liability. It doesn't seem like the liability is contingent on anything. Davis will clearly have to pay the liability next year. It's a pretty concrete liability from my perspective.

    Anyways, I'm wrong. The answer is A. Can somebody please explain?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764545
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Just3, it is A because the note was issued with RECOURSE. Meaning they are liable, hence, the full amount.

    And Thanks man! Guess Confidence is just as important as knowing the material.

    BEC- PASS

    #764546
    ABTX411
    Participant

    Discounted with recourse” means that Davis went to bank and essentially sold the receivable to them. Davis was in need of cash now and didn't want to wait for the bank to pay, so they received the cash from the bank instead of the customer (net of a 10% discount). This action would dr. cash and cr. notes receivable. HOWEVER – there is recourse, so the bank could come back to Davis to recover any amount that the customer does not pay IF the customer defaults on the note. For this reason, Davis is contingently liable to the bank for any amount that the customer doesn't pay, up to the full amount of the note.

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764547
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Spartans, confidence is super important! It's gotten me through many exams in my life.

    I get that you are liable with recourse liabilities. I just don't understand why this is contingent on anything. Wouldn't the question be the exact same if the word contingent was never even mentioned in the question?

    OHHH I get it! Thanks ABTX!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764548
    ABTX411
    Participant

    In Wiley, one of the lecturers responded to someone’s question basically telling them that he has NEVER seen an exam question that intentionally set out to blatantly trick the test taker with vocabulary technicality and a “$0” answer. So in this case, you can safely assume that the use of the term contingent liability is correct.

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764549
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Great explanation ABTX! This is what I mean haha. Sometimes we understand but not fully I guess. LOL

    BEC- PASS

    #764550
    ABTX411
    Participant

    No prob! I think we have to keep in mind that while the AICPA will do their best to write their questions appropriately, when it comes down to it, we are accountants, not English teachers, and the occasional grammatical issue or wording inconsistency will slip through on a test. It can make some questions sound iffy – like they are trying to trick you. Try not to get hung up on that kind of stuff. It'll slow you down and make you waste time.

    GOOD LUCK TODAY!!! You've got this. Be careful to save enough time for your SIMs, and carefully read through all of the info in any extra tabs that they provide. You've got this!

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764551
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Thanks, I will keep that in mind. That was my issue with AUD I didn't practice enough and on exam I was nervous when I saw a complete extra tab of info. Ill post on here later tonight or tomorrow morning. 🙂

    BEC- PASS

    #764552
    Claudia408
    Participant

    ABTX411 – thanks that is very comprehensive.

    Just3 – that question sounds like it's from REG!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764553
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    This is the worst day of studying for me. I am just not able to focus at all… Somebody fix me!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764554
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Last minute question:
    Pugh Co. reported the following in its statement of stockholders' equity on January 1 of the current year:

    Common stock, $5 par value, authorized 200,000 shares, issued 100,000 shares $ 500,000
    Additional paid-in capital 1,500,000
    Retained earnings 516,000
    Total 2,516,000
    Less treasury stock, at cost, 5,000 shares (40,000)
    Total stockholders' equity $ 2,476,000

    The following events occurred during the current year:
    May 1 – 1,000 shares of treasury stock were sold for $10,000.
    July 9 – 10,000 shares of previously unissued common stock were sold for $12 per share.
    October 1 – The distribution of a 2-for-1 stock split resulted in the common stock's per share par value being halved.

    Pugh accounts for treasury stock under the cost method. Laws in the state of Pugh's incorporation protect shares held in treasury from dilution when stock dividends or stock splits are declared.

    The number of outstanding common shares at December 31 should be:
    a. 212,000
    b. 222,000
    c. 216,000
    d. 220,000

    Why is the treasury stock sold (1000) an add? I thought it reduces CS outstanding, hence, a subtract?
    NVM LOL.. I got this after googling haha. Jeez, think I am just nervous! Well..this is it time to head in the center.

    BEC- PASS

    #764555
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    /

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

Viewing 15 replies - 871 through 885 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 59’ is closed to new replies.