FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 57

Viewing 15 replies - 841 through 855 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #764511
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Derivatives are lame.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764512
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Derivatives are lame.

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764513
    Spartans92
    Participant

    haha Just3, Yes they are but they are not that bad after like 40 Q's LOL. I really liked F10's IFRS vs GAAP comparison.

    BEC- PASS

    #764514
    Claudia408
    Participant

    ABTX411 – what kind of review course is this? is it taught by Wiley? or did you get a bunch of “random” people together who happen to study for the CPA that use Wiley?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764515
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Was having trouble viewing the post…this was fixed by posting lol

    BEC- PASS

    #764516
    rp 12
    Participant

    Hello Ninjas,

    I have a question on NFP.

    “An alumnus donated securities to Rex College, an NFP. The donor stipulated that the principal be held in perpetuity and that the investment income be used for faculty travel. Dividends received from the securities should be recognized as increases in…?”

    Since donor stipulated that the principal be held in perpetuity – this will be classified as a permanently restricted net assets right?

    But the explanation given is as follows “A temporary restriction permits the donee entity to expend the donated assets as specified. It is satisfied either by the passage of time or by actions of the entity. Given that (1) the principal is to be held in perpetuity, and (2) the investment income is to be used for faculty travel, the investment income is a temporarily restricted net asset. Donor-restricted contributions are restricted revenues or gains, and they increase temporarily restricted or permanently restricted net assets. Thus, because the dividends are considered temporarily restricted, they increase temporarily restricted net assets”

    Any clarification will be helpful and greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    "Success in life comes when you simply refuse to give up, with goals so strong that obstacles, failure, and loss act only as motivation"

    AUD: 68, 62, 77✔ (expires 10/31/16)
    FAR: 53, 48, XX (retake 6/16)
    REG:
    BEC: 53

    #764517
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    RP 12,

    The income from the permenently restricted endowment is temporarily restricted. This is because the INCOME (not the principal endowment) is to be used for faculty travel. Therefore, once this income is earned on the endowment, you will have a temporarily restricted funds until they are used.

    Example using your situation:

    Endowment of 1,000,000 = Never allowed to touch
    Endowment earns $1,000 interest income during year 1 (or dividends, you can pick)
    At December 31, Year 1 you have:

    1,000,000 permenetly restricted contribution which you will always have
    1,000 temporarily restricted

    March 1, Year 2:
    Faculty flies to conference across country for $400

    Dr. Temporily restricted assets released 400
    Cr. Temporarily restricted funds 400

    Dr. Temporarily restricted funds 400
    Cr. Cash 400

    December 31, Year 2
    You have:

    1,000,000 permenently restricted as always
    600 temporarily restricted (This is assuming your investment didn't earn any money in year 2, which in reality it would have)

    Does that make sense?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764518
    rp 12
    Participant

    Thanks Just3Letters! It makes sense.

    "Success in life comes when you simply refuse to give up, with goals so strong that obstacles, failure, and loss act only as motivation"

    AUD: 68, 62, 77✔ (expires 10/31/16)
    FAR: 53, 48, XX (retake 6/16)
    REG:
    BEC: 53

    #764519
    ABTX411
    Participant

    Claudia408-

    It's a review class taught by professors from the University of Texas at Dallas, so I wouldn't say it's actually “taught by Wiley,” but they work in conjunction with Wiley and use the Wiley program and materials to conduct the class. Masters Degree candidates can get credit toward our degree for taking the course if we are approved to sit prior to the start of the course. It's a very fast paced program, and additional tests are required for those of us seeking the degree credit. It was the fastest way for me to finish up my educational goals, so I decided to join the program despite heavy discouragement up front from the professors who were aware of my personal and professional obligations. Luckily I've managed to hang in there so far.

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764520
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    No probs rp,

    geez. Troubled Debt restructuring is absolutely killing me right now.

    The problems are too long to copy here but I never know when to use the new rate or old rate in order to get the gain/loss/valuation account/bad debt or whatever else it is 🙁

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764521
    Claudia408
    Participant

    why did par reduce to $2.5 from $5?

    Pugh Co. reported the following in its statement of stockholders' equity on January 1, 20X0:
    Common stock, $5 par value, authorized
    200,000 shares, issued 100,000 shares $500,000
    The following events occurred in 20X0:
    May 1 – 1,000 shares of treasury stock were sold for $10,000.
    July 9 – 10,000 shares of previously unissued common stock were sold for $12 per share.
    October 1 – The distribution of a 2-for-1 stock split resulted in the common stock's per share par value being halved.

    In Pugh's December 31, 20X0, statement of stockholders' equity, the par value of the issued common stock should be

    Answer: $2.5*220,000= 550,000

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764522
    KJ
    Participant

    Good luck Spartans for tomorrow!! Nail the (FAR) sucker 🙂

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764523
    Oneday
    Participant

    Can someone please explain how “expected cash flow adjusted for inflation and market risk” = ARO liability on settlement date? How can a “cash flow” be ARO liability?? Isn't cashflow the amount of cash in/outflow?

    On January 1, 2X01, Big Oil placed in service an offshore oil platform that it constructed. Big Oil is legally required to dismantle and remove the platform at the end of its 10-year estimated life. Using expected present value techniques, Big Oil recorded an estimated asset retirement obligation (ARO) of $100,000 on January 1, 2X01. The ARO measurements on January 1, 2X01, are as follows:

    Expected cash flow before inflation: $190,000
    Expected cash flow adjusted for inflation and market risk: $220,000
    Present value using credit-adjusted risk-free rate: $100,000
    Assuming that the ARO is settled on December 31, 2X10, for $170,000, what is the gain or loss on the settlement?

    A.
    $70,000 loss

    B.
    $20,000 gain

    C.
    $50,000 gain

    D.
    No gain or loss

    EXPLANATION———————
    The gain or loss on the settlement of the ARO liability is the difference between the ARO liability on settlement date of $220,000 and the actual settlement cost of $170,000.

    FASB ASC 410-20-40-2 requires the initial liability of $100,000 to be increased to the expected cash flow adjusted for market risk and inflation. Since the expected cash payment for the ARO liability was $220,000, a gain on settlement of $50,000 results.

    Note
    Accounting for ARO liability is similar to the treatment of bonds payable. The liability is initially recorded at its present value and is amortized. Amortization is recorded with a debit to accretion expense and a credit to ARO liability.

    #764524
    ABTX411
    Participant

    Claudia 408 – the stock split reduces the par value of the issued shares. Since treasury stock is already issued (just not outstanding) it is completely ignored in this question. Take the original 100,000 issued shares + 10,000 newly issued shares * 2 for the split = 220,000 shares. The split did not create any new value, so the original cost has to be allocated. Prior to the split, the 110,000 shares had a par value of $550,000 (110,000*$5). Post split, you now have 220,000 shares but the same $550,000 of par. $550/220 = $2.50. The key premise here is to remember that a split does not create additional shareholder equity. It only increases the number of shares.

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

    #764525
    ABTX411
    Participant

    ThisIsTheYear –

    An ARO is a required future cash flow. The company is required to pay this amount in the future in order to retire the asset in the future. It's basically the opposite of salvage value. Since it is a known future obligation, you must record the present value of the ARO, which is a one time payment, using the present value of $1 of the expected future cash flow adjusted for inflation and risk. So you are expecting to pay $220,000, but the present value recorded initially is $100,000. The $100,000 will acrete over time and will equal the $220,000 expected outflow at the end of year 10. This is similar to bond discount amortization. If you settle the obligation for $170,000 in year 10, and you have a liability on the books for $220,000, the offsetting entry is a gain on ARO for $50,000.

    BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
    AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
    FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
    REG - 88 - 5/19/2016

Viewing 15 replies - 841 through 855 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 57’ is closed to new replies.