- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 21, 2016 at 11:19 pm #764511
Just3LettersParticipantDerivatives are lame.
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 21, 2016 at 11:19 pm #764512
Just3LettersParticipantDerivatives are lame.
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 21, 2016 at 11:51 pm #764513
Spartans92Participanthaha Just3, Yes they are but they are not that bad after like 40 Q's LOL. I really liked F10's IFRS vs GAAP comparison.
BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 12:01 am #764514
Claudia408ParticipantApril 22, 2016 at 12:57 am #764515
Spartans92ParticipantWas having trouble viewing the post…this was fixed by posting lol
BEC- PASS
April 22, 2016 at 1:27 am #764516
rp 12ParticipantHello Ninjas,
I have a question on NFP.
“An alumnus donated securities to Rex College, an NFP. The donor stipulated that the principal be held in perpetuity and that the investment income be used for faculty travel. Dividends received from the securities should be recognized as increases in…?”
Since donor stipulated that the principal be held in perpetuity – this will be classified as a permanently restricted net assets right?
But the explanation given is as follows “A temporary restriction permits the donee entity to expend the donated assets as specified. It is satisfied either by the passage of time or by actions of the entity. Given that (1) the principal is to be held in perpetuity, and (2) the investment income is to be used for faculty travel, the investment income is a temporarily restricted net asset. Donor-restricted contributions are restricted revenues or gains, and they increase temporarily restricted or permanently restricted net assets. Thus, because the dividends are considered temporarily restricted, they increase temporarily restricted net assets”
Any clarification will be helpful and greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
"Success in life comes when you simply refuse to give up, with goals so strong that obstacles, failure, and loss act only as motivation"
AUD: 68, 62, 77✔ (expires 10/31/16)
FAR: 53, 48, XX (retake 6/16)
REG:
BEC: 53April 22, 2016 at 1:48 am #764517
Just3LettersParticipantRP 12,
The income from the permenently restricted endowment is temporarily restricted. This is because the INCOME (not the principal endowment) is to be used for faculty travel. Therefore, once this income is earned on the endowment, you will have a temporarily restricted funds until they are used.
Example using your situation:
Endowment of 1,000,000 = Never allowed to touch
Endowment earns $1,000 interest income during year 1 (or dividends, you can pick)
At December 31, Year 1 you have:1,000,000 permenetly restricted contribution which you will always have
1,000 temporarily restrictedMarch 1, Year 2:
Faculty flies to conference across country for $400Dr. Temporily restricted assets released 400
Cr. Temporarily restricted funds 400Dr. Temporarily restricted funds 400
Cr. Cash 400December 31, Year 2
You have:1,000,000 permenently restricted as always
600 temporarily restricted (This is assuming your investment didn't earn any money in year 2, which in reality it would have)Does that make sense?
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 22, 2016 at 1:58 am #764518
rp 12ParticipantThanks Just3Letters! It makes sense.
"Success in life comes when you simply refuse to give up, with goals so strong that obstacles, failure, and loss act only as motivation"
AUD: 68, 62, 77✔ (expires 10/31/16)
FAR: 53, 48, XX (retake 6/16)
REG:
BEC: 53April 22, 2016 at 2:28 am #764519
ABTX411ParticipantClaudia408-
It's a review class taught by professors from the University of Texas at Dallas, so I wouldn't say it's actually “taught by Wiley,” but they work in conjunction with Wiley and use the Wiley program and materials to conduct the class. Masters Degree candidates can get credit toward our degree for taking the course if we are approved to sit prior to the start of the course. It's a very fast paced program, and additional tests are required for those of us seeking the degree credit. It was the fastest way for me to finish up my educational goals, so I decided to join the program despite heavy discouragement up front from the professors who were aware of my personal and professional obligations. Luckily I've managed to hang in there so far.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 2:33 am #764520
Just3LettersParticipantNo probs rp,
geez. Troubled Debt restructuring is absolutely killing me right now.
The problems are too long to copy here but I never know when to use the new rate or old rate in order to get the gain/loss/valuation account/bad debt or whatever else it is 🙁
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDApril 22, 2016 at 2:52 am #764521
Claudia408Participantwhy did par reduce to $2.5 from $5?
Pugh Co. reported the following in its statement of stockholders' equity on January 1, 20X0:
Common stock, $5 par value, authorized
200,000 shares, issued 100,000 shares $500,000
The following events occurred in 20X0:
May 1 – 1,000 shares of treasury stock were sold for $10,000.
July 9 – 10,000 shares of previously unissued common stock were sold for $12 per share.
October 1 – The distribution of a 2-for-1 stock split resulted in the common stock's per share par value being halved.In Pugh's December 31, 20X0, statement of stockholders' equity, the par value of the issued common stock should be
Answer: $2.5*220,000= 550,000
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8April 22, 2016 at 2:53 am #764522
KJParticipantGood luck Spartans for tomorrow!! Nail the (FAR) sucker 🙂
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
April 22, 2016 at 3:29 am #764523
OnedayParticipantCan someone please explain how “expected cash flow adjusted for inflation and market risk” = ARO liability on settlement date? How can a “cash flow” be ARO liability?? Isn't cashflow the amount of cash in/outflow?
On January 1, 2X01, Big Oil placed in service an offshore oil platform that it constructed. Big Oil is legally required to dismantle and remove the platform at the end of its 10-year estimated life. Using expected present value techniques, Big Oil recorded an estimated asset retirement obligation (ARO) of $100,000 on January 1, 2X01. The ARO measurements on January 1, 2X01, are as follows:
Expected cash flow before inflation: $190,000
Expected cash flow adjusted for inflation and market risk: $220,000
Present value using credit-adjusted risk-free rate: $100,000
Assuming that the ARO is settled on December 31, 2X10, for $170,000, what is the gain or loss on the settlement?A.
$70,000 lossB.
$20,000 gainC.
$50,000 gainD.
No gain or lossEXPLANATION———————
The gain or loss on the settlement of the ARO liability is the difference between the ARO liability on settlement date of $220,000 and the actual settlement cost of $170,000.FASB ASC 410-20-40-2 requires the initial liability of $100,000 to be increased to the expected cash flow adjusted for market risk and inflation. Since the expected cash payment for the ARO liability was $220,000, a gain on settlement of $50,000 results.
Note
Accounting for ARO liability is similar to the treatment of bonds payable. The liability is initially recorded at its present value and is amortized. Amortization is recorded with a debit to accretion expense and a credit to ARO liability.April 22, 2016 at 3:31 am #764524
ABTX411ParticipantClaudia 408 – the stock split reduces the par value of the issued shares. Since treasury stock is already issued (just not outstanding) it is completely ignored in this question. Take the original 100,000 issued shares + 10,000 newly issued shares * 2 for the split = 220,000 shares. The split did not create any new value, so the original cost has to be allocated. Prior to the split, the 110,000 shares had a par value of $550,000 (110,000*$5). Post split, you now have 220,000 shares but the same $550,000 of par. $550/220 = $2.50. The key premise here is to remember that a split does not create additional shareholder equity. It only increases the number of shares.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016April 22, 2016 at 3:44 am #764525
ABTX411ParticipantThisIsTheYear –
An ARO is a required future cash flow. The company is required to pay this amount in the future in order to retire the asset in the future. It's basically the opposite of salvage value. Since it is a known future obligation, you must record the present value of the ARO, which is a one time payment, using the present value of $1 of the expected future cash flow adjusted for inflation and risk. So you are expecting to pay $220,000, but the present value recorded initially is $100,000. The $100,000 will acrete over time and will equal the $220,000 expected outflow at the end of year 10. This is similar to bond discount amortization. If you settle the obligation for $170,000 in year 10, and you have a liability on the books for $220,000, the offsetting entry is a gain on ARO for $50,000.
BEC - 90 - 2/04/2016
AUD - 97 - 2/29/2016
FAR - 92 - 4/19/2016
REG - 88 - 5/19/2016 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 57’ is closed to new replies.
