- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 22, 2016 at 12:01 am #763716
Spartans92ParticipantMarch 22, 2016 at 12:51 am #763717
Excel14ParticipantHere is the question….
Question: 3 On December 1, Wall Company purchased trading securities. Pertinent data are as follows:
Security. Cost Fair value at 12/31
A. 39,000. 36,000
B. 50,000. 55,000
C. 96,000. 85,000On December 31, Wall reclassified its investment in security C from trading to available-for-sale because Wall intends to retain security C. What net loss on its securities should be included in Wall’s income statement for the year ended December 31?
A. $11,000
B. $14,000
C. $0
D. $9,000Answer (D) is correct.
Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in earnings, and reclassification is at fair value. Furthermore, “for a security transferred from the trading category, the unrealized holding gain or loss at the date of transfer already will have been recognized in earnings and shall not be reversed.†Thus, the net unrealized holding loss at 12/31 is $9,000 ($3,000 loss on A – $5,000 gain on B + $11,000 loss on C).
My issue with this question, is that we don't analyze anything until 12/31 of the first year, which this is. At that time we made the change from trading to available for sale (Security C), but NOTHING has been placed into earnings before now. The answer is worded such, that we've already taken care of any unrealized losses in earnings, when in reality we have not yet.
BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REGCIA, CGAP, CFE
March 22, 2016 at 1:18 am #763718
Excel14ParticipantNever mind. I think I have a better handle on it now. We haven't actually recognized the $11,000 loss on Security C previously, but we are doing it at 12/31 of the first year ( peculiar wording for this question). From 1/1/2 forward, we will treat this security as an AFS, with unrealized gains/losses hitting OCI each period.
BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REGCIA, CGAP, CFE
March 22, 2016 at 1:23 am #763719
marqzhoParticipantSpartans92
I always re-watch the lecture. There is no best way to study for everyone but the best way for you.
AFS, Trading, HTM is a relatively easy topic. It can be MCQ or SIMS type question.Basic concept
AFS and Trading report at Market Value
unrealized gain or loss for AFS goes to OCI
unrealized gain or loss for Trading goes to I/S
Only bond can be classified as HTM
HTM report at amortized cost
remember the reclassification, Alw. If AFS to HTM, OCI for that AFS needs to be amortized.
Classification is based on the intention and ability of the company
permanent impairment loss goes to I/S
make sure to read the question, sometimes it will say the co. elect to use FV accounting option🙂
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84March 22, 2016 at 1:27 am #763720
marqzhoParticipantExcel14
Glad that you figure it out yourself. For this question, it won't be affected whether we have or haven't already taken care the loss 🙂
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84March 22, 2016 at 1:37 am #763721
Excel14ParticipantYeah, had the answer not included the $11,000 for Security C, then I'd take issue with it! :). As it stands, Gleim was just quoting something within the study unit for trading security transfers to another category, even though it technically hadn't happened yet in this question. Have I mentioned that I hate FAR? Lol
BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REGCIA, CGAP, CFE
March 22, 2016 at 1:43 am #763722
marqzhoParticipantsometimes I hate my client, but they bring me $, what can i say :)?
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84March 22, 2016 at 2:07 am #763723
Excel14ParticipantSay….Thank you! 🙂
BEC (2/28/16) ----- 78
FAR (09/10/16)-----
AUD
REGCIA, CGAP, CFE
March 22, 2016 at 2:47 am #763724
Spartans92Participant@marqzhao thanks a lot! That does ring a bell now.. it wasnt too bad when learning it my becker average was in the 70s for the securities questions 🙂 appreciate the help
BEC- PASS
March 22, 2016 at 2:54 am #763725
Claudia408Participantchanging my question here bc i figured out the other one…
Assume that in acquiring a subsidiary, the parent determined there were several depreciable assets of the subsidiary that had a fair value less than book value. What effect will this fair value less than book value of the subsidiary's assets have on the following accounts in the preparation of consolidated statements?
Answer: Decrease for both depreciable assets and depreciation expense.
Not sure I understand why depreciation expense is decreased… can someone help explain?
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8March 22, 2016 at 3:50 pm #763726
SONAParticipantMarch 22, 2016 at 4:03 pm #763727
marqzhoParticipantI would think that when you do consolidation and depreciable assets of the subsidiary that had a fair value less than book value, we need to write that down to the F.V. This would decrease the asset value. Since asset value / depreciation basis decrease, it would decrease depreciation expense.
Not so sure:)
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84March 22, 2016 at 4:23 pm #763728
marqzhoParticipant–
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84March 22, 2016 at 6:16 pm #763729
Operation_CPAParticipantGlad to say I am starting my final review today (I have around 3 weeks). Not going to lie, It's tough not getting caught up in the minor details, there is so much information. Trying to put together a solid strategy and compile a list of must know topics.
I am re-doing a bunch of the Becker sections & purchased NINJA MCQ. Would you guys agree with my major focus areas? Again, not trying to get caught up in too many minor details.
Governmental / NFP
Bonds / Leases
Pensions
Statement of Cash flows – EPS / Diluted EPS calculations
Treasury Stock – Par value vs cost method
Cost / Equity / Consolidations
Inventory (LIFO, FIFO, etc.)
Like Kind Exchanges
Completed Contract / Percentage of completion Methods
General IFRS vs. US GAAP differences
ImpairmentsMarch 22, 2016 at 6:31 pm #763730
Claudia408Participant@marqzho – ok so since the asset FV must decrease that means it was over depreciated so depreciation expense must decrease as well?
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 4’ is closed to new replies.
