FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 26

Viewing 15 replies - 376 through 390 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #764046
    Spartan15
    Participant

    @Just3Letters

    On the exam they will be totally independent of each other. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I have never experienced such a situation or heard of anyone who has.

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 96
    REG - 92
    FAR -

    #764047
    Operation_CPA
    Participant

    @Just3Letters

    I am almost positive they are independent from each other. I have never heard of a continuous problem.

    #764048
    Incoming91
    Participant

    I agree with Spartan15 – independent.

    REG: 80
    FAR: 78 (x2)
    AUD: 6/10
    BEC: 7/20

    #764049
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Great,

    thanks friends!

    Ward, a consultant, keeps her accounting records on a cash basis. During year 2, Ward collected $200,000 in service fees from her clients. At December 31, Year 1, Ward had AR of $40,000. At December 31, Year 2, Ward at AR of 60,000, and unearned fees of $5000. On an accrual basis, what was ward's service revenue for year 2?

    I HATE these questions. They would be so easy if I could just figure out “how to apply” the squeeze formula. I can never figure out whether to do a formula for “revenues” or “AR” or any other possibility. How do you guys think about this kind of stuff? I resorted to a T-account which gave me the incorrect answer.

    I did: Start with Debit of 40,000 + 200,000 – Credit of 5000 = Debit of 60,000. The plug for that was 175,000 which is incorrect. SO FRUSTRATING. Sorry, just venting haha

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764050
    Spartan15
    Participant

    I think you need to think more about the substance of the transaction instead of just applying it to a formula, which is what I've been trying to do.

    1. So we know that A/R is related to revenue that is earned, but cash has not been collected on, right? So if A/R is increasing, that means that we have increased the amount earned for accrual purposes that haven't been recognized for cash purposes. So in this case we would add the $20,000 increase in A/R

    2. The reason that Unearned Revenue is a decrease is because it is income that we have recognized for the cash basis, but will not for accrual. Anytime you are receiving cash under the cash basis, you recognize the income, regardless of it would be earned under the accrual method, which explains the ($5,000) decrease.

    So by adding it up we get $200,000 + 20,000 increase in A/R – 5,000 unearned revenue = $215,000

    I tried doing the T-Account method you were explaining, but couldn't get it to work. Sorry If this doesn't make sense but I thought I would just throw out how I think about it

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 96
    REG - 92
    FAR -

    #764051
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Does anyone know how the discount/premium was amortized? I got to the total that should be amortized but not the number of months…

    On June 30, 20X14, Ariadne, Inc. issued 2,500 of its 6%, ten-year, $1,000 face value bonds with detachable stock warrants at par. Each bond carried a detachable warrant for one share of Ariadne’s common stock at a specified option price of $24 per share. Immediately after issuance, the market value of the bonds without the warrants was $2,250,000 and the market value of the warrants was $305,000. In its December 31, 20X14 balance sheet, what amount should Ariadne report as bonds payable, net of discount or premium? Assume straight-line amortization.

    ANSWER:
    $2,216,487

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764052
    KJ
    Participant

    @ Just3letters…the other way I look at that question is in Statement of Cash Flow method; converting from cash basis to accrual.

    Revenue – 200,000
    Increase in AR = add 20,000
    Decrease is revenue (unearned) = subtract 5,000
    Cash effect = 200,000+20,000-5,000 = $215,000

    How I remember cash flow on cash basis: Dr balance accounts are added and Cr. balance accounts are subtracted.
    On the other hand if it was accrual it will be opposite (Dr balance accounts will be subtracted and Cr. balance will be added).

    Hope you don't hate cash flows like I did : -)

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764053
    Spartans92
    Participant

    On January 2, Smith purchased the net assets of Jones' Cleaning, a sole proprietorship, for $350,000, and commenced operations of Spiffy Cleaning, a sole proprietorship. The assets had a carrying amount of $375,000 and a market value of $360,000. In Spiffy's cash-basis financial statements for the year ended December 31, Spiffy reported revenues in excess of expenses of $60,000. Smith's drawings during the year were $20,000. In Spiffy's financial statements, what amount should be reported as Capital-Smith?

    Answer is 390k.
    Why do we use the Cost of 350k and not FMV? This is F-10 btw for partnerships.

    BEC- PASS

    #764054
    Spartan15
    Participant

    At the end of the year, Ian Co. determined its inventory to be $258,000 on a FIFO (first in, first out) basis. The current replacement cost of this inventory was $230,000. Ian estimates that it could sell the inventory for $275,000 at a disposal cost of $14,000. If Ian's normal profit margin for its inventory was $10,000, what would be its net carrying value under U.S. GAAP?
    a.
    $261,000
    b.
    $258,000
    c.
    $244,000
    d.
    $251,000

    Does anyone know why this example uses Lower of Cost or Market for FIFO. I thought with the new ASU (Which Becker said is testable in April), all methods that are not LIFO or Retail should use the Lower of Cost or NRV?

    AUD - 99
    BEC - 96
    REG - 92
    FAR -

    #764055
    KJ
    Participant

    @Spartans92….I think the CV and FMV is for Jones' Cleaning not Smith. Smith's basis will be his contribution which is the $350K.

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #764056
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Thanks Kanwal… Def. need to reread every Q. Eyes are so darn tired from reading already and am behind schedule

    BEC- PASS

    #764057
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Just scored my very first ever 75% on MCQs not seen… and it was on Deferred Taxes! lol. There's hope!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #764058
    sagittarian
    Participant

    I'm not clear about when foreign exchange gains/losses are shown in income statement and when it's shown in other comprehensive income. Could someone please explain?

    Thanks!

    #764059
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Sagittarian,,

    The difference here is translation adjustments versus re-measurements.

    Translations adjustments are “Normal” which hit the I/S which is “Normal” for Gains or Losses

    -Translation adjustments occur when the foreign currency is the local currency.

    Re-measurements are “weird” or “abnormal” and Hit AOCI first which is “Abnormal” for Gains or Losses

    -Re-measurements occur when the foreign currency is not that of the local currency.

    That's how I remember it anyways

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #764060
    Incoming91
    Participant

    @ Claudia408

    You posted a question about bond amortization straight line method. Do you have the explanation to the answer you provided? Could you please provide if you do?

    REG: 80
    FAR: 78 (x2)
    AUD: 6/10
    BEC: 7/20

Viewing 15 replies - 376 through 390 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 26’ is closed to new replies.