FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 18

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #763926
    Claudia408
    Participant

    OCI includes:
    Derivative CF hedge
    Excess adjustment of pension
    Net unrealized G/L from AFS
    Transaction adjustment on foreign currency

    you would subtract OCI from net income to get to comprehensive income

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #763927
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Claudia,

    I don't see how that means Investments from owners are part of OCI? Can you explain?

    Also,

    I got the correct answer on this question just because it was the only “answer” that I could calculate. However, can somebody explain to me why the warranty expense/liablity account is a running-basis account? If you have 60,000 at the start of the year, and you estimated 80000 for the following year, should you just debit the account for 20000 more so that you can have the 80000 rather than adding 80000 more to get 140000?

    Bold Company estimates its annual warranty expense at 2% of annual net sales. The following data are available:

    Net sales for year 2 $4,000,000

    Warranty liability account: December 31, year 1 $ 60,000 credit
    Warranty payments during year 2 50,000 debit
    After recording the year 2 estimated warranty expense, the warranty liability account would show a December 31, year 2 balance of

    $10,000
    $70,000
    $80,000
    $90,000

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763928
    marqzho
    Participant

    mckan514w

    Answer has to be Sales Revenue 🙂

    Comprehensive income = NI + OCI
    Sales Revenue is a part of NI

    Investments by owners and Distributions to owners are sort of the same in natural. They both affect equity but not income. If one is correct then the other one has to be correct too 🙂

    Deferred revenue is not yet income.

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763929
    Claudia408
    Participant

    actually now i read the question more carefully, i'm confused too. bc “Comprehensive income is the total non-owner change in equity for a reporting period. This change encompasses all changes in equity other than transactions from owners and distributions to owners.” … so yea wth?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #763930
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Yeah marqzho,

    the answer is definitely sales revenue.

    is that becker? I guess we broke becker 🙂

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763931
    marqzho
    Participant

    Just3Letters

    Because of this line “Bold Company estimates its annual warranty expense at 2% of annual net sales”

    “Annual” Warranty expense = 2% of “annual” net sales
    It doesn't matter what the balance is in the Warranty account, you debit 2% of net sales for expense every year.

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763932
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Thanks Marqzho,

    I get the difference now!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763933
    Operation_CPA
    Participant

    I found this link on the forum and have it bookmarked. Would you say these are the MUST know J/E's for Gov / NFP? I don't want to leave anything out. Also for those that haven't seen it, it's a nice little summary of key points. Thanks to whoever made it.

    https://sites.google.com/site/farnotes/gas-34/journal-entries–fund-based-vs-government-wide

    https://sites.google.com/site/farnotes/governmental-accounting-notes/governmental-unit-journal-entries

    #763934
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Another one.

    How would the amortization of premium on bonds payable affect each of the following?

    Carrying value of bond Net income
    Increase Decrease
    Increase Increase
    Decrease Decrease
    Decrease Increase

    Isn't the J/E:

    Dr. Premium XXX
    Dr. Int. Exp. XXX
    Cr. Cash XXX

    So I thought it would decrease the CV AND decrease net income because of the int. exp?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763935
    marqzho
    Participant

    you have interest expense because of the Bond not the premium. The question asked about the effect by the premium.

    So you know the J/E

    Let's forget about premium, your J/E would be
    Dr. Int. Exp. 100
    Cr. Cash 100

    Now you have to amortize the premium, your J/E would be
    Dr. Amort of P 10
    Dr. Int Exp 90
    Cr. Cash 100

    you can see, with amortize of the premium, you actually decrease your int. exp. Therefore, the effect of amortize of the premium increase your NI.

    Hope that makes sense 🙂

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #763936
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    I vote marqzho MVP

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763937
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Bunson Township was incorporated on January 1, Year 1, and is preparing its government-wide financial statements for the year ended December 31, Year 1. The governmental funds displayed a combined change in fund balance of $500,000 for that year and also had the following balances, data, or transactions:

    Capital outlay of $250,000 partially funded by long-term debt proceeds of $225,000;
    Current year depreciation of $60,000 on a capital asset base of $1,200,000;
    Principal payments (on debt) of $40,000;
    Interest payments (on debt) through October 1 of $30,000;
    Principal payments of $10,000 incurred through December 31 but paid on January 2;
    Interest payments of $7,500 incurred through December 31 but paid on January 2;
    Sales tax revenues of $30,000 associated with December 31, Year 1 sales remitted to the State in February and paid to the Township in March.

    The government-wide changes in net position would be displayed as:
    a.
    $527,500
    b.
    $597,500
    c.
    $455,000
    d.
    $587,500

    Answer: A
    I am confused on all the interest payment and principal payment part.. I get the 7500 is subtracted because incurred it under Full Accrual you need to recognize.. But what about the 10k and the 40k and 30k?? I am lost.
    So I got 500K + 250K – 225K – 60K – 7.5K+30K and I went with the closest C which is wrong.

    BEC- PASS

    #763938
    JulieMoseley
    Participant

    I'm joining in! Taking FAR for the 3rd time in May. Third time is the charm right?

    FAR - 65 (11/2015), 65 (01/2016), 3rd and hopefully final attempt May 2016
    BEC - 67 (02/2016), Retake - 4/4/2016
    AUD - July 2016
    REG - October 2016

    #763939
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Spartans,

    I'll help you out in a couple weeks when I get to gov't stuff sorry!

    You definitely got it this time Julie! Did you immediately reschedule FAR again after your first take? You didn't have other exams scheduled?

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #763940
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Thanks Just3! And good luck Julie!

    BEC- PASS

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 18’ is closed to new replies.