- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
June 21, 2016 at 2:49 am #765981
AnonymousInactiveClaudia408,
I got a 73, and I felt good during the test and though I had it too. Score told me I was weak in Ind tax and prop trx.
Oh well, how depressing just thinking of re-studying and taking it again.
My dilema is that I made the mistake of registering for both Bec and Aug expiring by early Sept, so now do I hit REG after I take FAR or study BEC or AUD before the Sept expiring.
June 22, 2016 at 12:22 am #765982
OnedayParticipantPlease see the answer explanation, as Im confused why the explanation would ADD amortization back into the discounted amount to find Carrying amount. Such as 850,000 + 25,000 = 875,000. I thought it would be subtraction, not addition.
On January 2, 20X1, Nast Co. issued 8% bonds with a face amount of $1,000,000 that mature on January 2, 20X7. The bonds were issued to yield 12%, resulting in a discount of $150,000. Nast incorrectly used the straight-line method instead of the effective interest method to amortize the discount. How is the carrying amount of the bonds affected by the error?
A.
December 31, 20X1: Overstated; January 2, 20X7: UnderstatedB. correct**
December 31, 20X1: Overstated; January 2, 20X7: No effectC.
December 31, 20X1: Understated; January 2, 20X7: OverstatedD.
December 31, 20X1: Understated; January 2, 20X7: No effectExplanation
When the bond’s yield requires a discount, the bond’s interest expense is based (early on) on a lower principal, and thus the expense applying straight-line would be higher (it is an average expense for the term). The discount amortization would be too high for the first year (overstating bond carrying value), but under both methods at the end of the term, the carrying amounts will be the bond face amount.Carrying amount on 1/2/X1 = $1,000,000 – $150,000 = $850,000
Amortization of discount:
Using straight-line = $150,000 / 6 yrs
= $25,000 / yr.
Using effective interest = (0.12 x $850,000) – (.08 x $1,000,000)
= $22,000Carrying amount on 12/31/X1:
Using straight-line = $850,000 + $25,000
= $875,000
Using effective interest = $850,000 + $22,000
= $872,000Overstatement of carrying
value when using straight-line = $875,000 – $872,000
= $3,000Over the 6-year life of the bonds, the same total discount amortization will occur under each method. The bond carrying amount on January 2, 20X7, will be the maturity value regardless of the amortization method.
Thus, on December 31, 20X1, the bond carrying value will be overstated if straight-line amortization of discount is used but on January 2, 20X7, there will be no effect from its use.
June 22, 2016 at 12:58 am #765983
AnonymousInactiveThisIsTheYear,
I hope this help.
Any time a bond is sold at a discount, it will be less than par and will mature over time to be PAR, right?
Ex. Sold at 90 and will be maturing to 100 in couple years.
So, 90 will always be adding the amortized discount annually to the carrying amount till maturity
Yr 1. 90 + 1 = 91, Yr 10 = 99 + 1 = 100 when it matures.Therefore, Discount or Premium will always = PAR at maturity date.
The question in this problem is finding which amortization method and how it affect current year.
June 22, 2016 at 1:16 am #765984
OnedayParticipantDLu.. Facepalm… I forgot that. Thank you.
June 22, 2016 at 2:04 am #765985
ZyxParticipantJune 22, 2016 at 12:34 pm #765986June 22, 2016 at 4:31 pm #765987
ZyxParticipantI think if you study full time, it's enought.
REG: 77 x2
BEC: 81 x3
FAR: 68 retake 10/1
AUD: 8/27June 22, 2016 at 5:46 pm #765988
AnonymousInactiveThanks @zyx11. I currently work so I'm only able to devote 2-3 hours a day M-Th and then more on the weekends. I want to make sure I am giving myself ample time. I'm taking AUD again (hopefully 7/25) and would then plan to take FAR on 8/1. Just wondering if I should push FAR into the next window or leave it as is.
June 22, 2016 at 11:06 pm #765989
ZyxParticipantI work full time and have study schedule pretty much like you. I pull 2-3 hrs Mon-Fri, 6-8 hrs on Sat and 4-5 hrs on Sun. I am a slow reader, so I probably take longer time than average people. I'm taking 12 weeks to study and I feel it's too long. 10 weeks is enough for me. So 5-6 weeks will be real tough for me but everyone studies differently. FAR has so much details, you might need to reconsider. However, I have seen some people passed it with 5-6 weeks study and I have no idea how they did that.
REG: 77 x2
BEC: 81 x3
FAR: 68 retake 10/1
AUD: 8/27June 23, 2016 at 12:10 am #765990
KJParticipantWhat effect would the sale of a company's trading securities at their carrying amounts for cash have on each of the following ratios?
A.
An increase in both current ratio and quick ratioB.
An increase in current ratio and no effect on quick ratioC.
No effect on current ratio and an increase in quick ratioD.
No effect on current ratio or quick ratioThe answer is D.
I want to know if I am thinking this right. The reason it will not have affect on either ratio is because T/S will be reported at FV on Balance Sheet and the question is asking that sale is at carrying amount for cash.
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
June 23, 2016 at 1:28 am #765991
ZyxParticipantI think it's because TS just changes to cash which decreases in TS and increases in cash at carrying amount, the same amount and both are current asset. The increase amount in cash and decrease amount in TS offset each other. So it does not affect the ratios. I have seen this question but I'm not so sure if my answer is correct.
REG: 77 x2
BEC: 81 x3
FAR: 68 retake 10/1
AUD: 8/27June 23, 2016 at 2:07 am #765992
KJParticipantThanks zyx11.
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
June 24, 2016 at 4:26 am #765993
Jess774Participant@KING What study material are you using? I'm using Becker for FAR. Becker FAR is made up of 10 sections. If you studied for 6 weeks, that would mean 2 sections per week with one week for review which would be tough (I think). FAR is a beast. I would suggest 8 weeks, but it takes me a while to retain things.
REG - 75
BEC - 70, 64, 81!!!!
FAR - 67, 69, retake: Oct 2016
AUD - 8/25/16June 24, 2016 at 8:27 am #765994
loloMemberGuys are lower cost or market for lifo and retail and lower cost or NRV for inventory if its not lifo or retail GAAP new rules effective rules for testing now???
My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS
AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
REG - TBDJune 24, 2016 at 11:24 am #765995
loloMember??
My Nick name is sunshine, but the fact is I have not been in touch with it since I started this CPA exam! IT HURTS
AUD - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
BEC - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
FAR - ✔ Passed Becker self study!
REG - TBD -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 155’ is closed to new replies.
