FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 101

Viewing 15 replies - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #765171
    KJ
    Participant

    pickanicken.. I was in similar situation, had a good understanding and then bombed MCQ. I moved on but will be reviewing it once I start my final review next week.

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #765172
    KJ
    Participant

    Good luck Just3letters…We all will be waiting to hear your experience tomorrow for sure 🙂

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #765173
    SONA
    Participant

    Good Luck Just3letters…….

    #765174
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Thanks everyone! I've been super busy with last minute studying! I'll check in tomorrow after I'm Done!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #765175
    Just3Letters
    Participant

    Thanks everyone! I've been super busy with last minute studying! I'll check in tomorrow after I'm Done!

    FAR- 81
    REG- 81
    BEC- Aug 22, 2016
    AUD- TBD

    #765176
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Good Luck Just3!

    BEC- PASS

    #765177
    1dayatatime
    Participant

    Once again, I let Becker's final exam freak me out. Fear not, test-takers, the actual exam rarely gives long, wordy, and convoluted questions that take many minutes to read let alone answer. It was still a difficult exam, but I feel much better after taking it than I did before.

    AUD - Pass
    REG - Pass
    BEC - Pass
    FAR - Pass

    #765178
    KJ
    Participant

    9. On January 1, year 1, Boston Group issued $100,000 par value, 5% five-year bonds when the market rate of interest was 8%. Interest is payable annually on December 31. The following present value information is available:
    5%
    Present value of $1 (n = 5) 0.78353 Present value of an ordinary annuity (n = 5) 4.32948
    8%
    Present value of $1 (n = 5) 0.68058 Present value of an ordinary annuity (n = 5) 3.99271

    What amount is the value of net bonds payable at the end of year 1?

    $88,022
    $90,064
    $100,000
    $110,638

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #765179
    Claudia408
    Participant

    marqzho – i have a reg question about partner & partnership liability, can you help? lol. i'll post in REG study group 🙂

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #765180
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry to repost again, but here it is
    :

    Facts: Olinto Corporation (subsidiary) sold equipment on January 1, Year 1 to Gearty Corporation (parent) for $100,000. The equipment had a net book value of $70,000 (cost of $90,000 and accumulated depreciation of $20,000), and a remaining life of ten years. January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the sale on Olinto's books:

    DR: Cash $100,000

    DR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000

    CR: Machinery (original cost) $90,000

    CR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000

    January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the purchase on Gearty's books:

    DR: Machinery $100,000

    CR: Cash $100,000

    December 31, Year 1 journal entry to record the depreciation on Gearty's books:

    DR: Depreciation expense ($100,000/10) $10,000

    CR: Accumulated depreciation $10,000

    December 31, Year 1 workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of intercompany gain and adjustment of the machine and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original balance:

    DR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000

    CR: Machinery ($100,000 – $90,000) $10,000

    CR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000

    The depreciation expense recorded by Gearty is overstated by the intercompany profit included in the cost of the machinery.

    Workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of excess depreciation :

    DR: Accumulated depreciation $3,000

    CR: Depreciation expense $3,000

    I desperately need help understanding this problem. It's an example from pg. 50 of 2014 Becker FAR. I get everything except for the first 12/31/Y1 elimination entry involving machinery and acc. dep. Can someone please explain to me how a credit entry of 20,000 adjusts the acc. dep. to its original balance? I get that for machinery, 100-90-10(elimination entry)=0. But for acc. dep., 10-20+20=10.

    Is the 20,000 acc. dep. amount just a plug in this case?

    Please help! Thank you!

    #765181
    SONA
    Participant

    kanwal78

    step 1: PV of $1@market rate(8%) x bond face value =100000*0.68058 = 68058

    step 2: PV of ordinary annuity of $1@ market rate(8%) x (face amt. x stated rate) = 3.99271 x (100000 x 5%)=19963.55

    Ans: Net bonds payable = 68058+19963.55= 88021.55 or 88022

    I think this might help you. If i am not wrong. The only time you use the stated rate is in STEP 2.

    #765182
    tkchurch1
    Participant

    I just took FAR on 4/15/16 using Becker materials and failed with a 67… I just bought your FAR Ninja Notes and am planning to take FAR again the first of July. I have to pass this exam. Any advice?

    #765183
    J2theO41
    Participant

    Hey could someone help me understand the reasoning behind the answer to this question?

    Northstar Co. acquired a registered trademark for $600K. The trademark has a remaining legal life of five years, but can be renewed every 10 years for a nominal fee. Northstar expects to renew the trademark indefinitely. What amount of amortization expense should Northstar record for the trademark in the current year?

    A. 0
    B. 15K
    C. 40K
    D. 120K

    The correct answer is A. I put D, because although it can be renewed indefinitely, my line of thinking was that it's legal life would expire and it would take an additional 5 years after that to be able to renew it again and by then the trademark potentially could be worthless. Maybe I am just overthinking this question and should just count this as an indefinite life asset, but the 5 year gap makes me doubt this and it is bugging me. Any help would be nice thanks.

    REG- 86 (February 2016)
    BEC- 84 (April 2016)
    FAR- 88 (July 2016)
    AUD- August 2016

    #765184
    SONA
    Participant

    J2theO41

    Under US GAAP, the intangible asset with infinite life is tested for impairment.

    So no amortization.

    #765185
    J2theO41
    Participant

    Ok thanks Sona that helped me put it together better. I guess if something happened in the five year gap making the infinite life intangible asset worthless then impairment testing would capture it. Thanks

    REG- 86 (February 2016)
    BEC- 84 (April 2016)
    FAR- 88 (July 2016)
    AUD- August 2016

Viewing 15 replies - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 101’ is closed to new replies.