FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 100

Viewing 15 replies - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 2,358 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #765156
    patelhj1
    Participant

    I have roughly the 14 days also, and currently what I am doing is re-reading and re-doing all the MCQ per chapter per day. I finished F1 yesterday and I'm on F2 today….. (using becker)

    Good idea or bad idea?

    BEC 78 08/2015
    REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
    FAR 75! 5/2016
    AUD ? 8/2016

    Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
    Google most difficult professional exam

    #765157
    Moeshow
    Participant

    Governmental accounting question hoping someone might know.

    —Both refer to governmental fund capital project fund
    8. In the general fixed assets account group, should a credit amount be recorded for 20X4 in “Investment in general fixed assets—capital projects fund”?
    Answer- The civic center reconstruction will be recorded in the general fixed assets account group with a debit to the asset account and a credit to investment in general fixed assets- capital projects fund.
    9. In the general fixed assets account group, could Bel elect to record depreciation in 20X5 on the civic center?
    Answer- Assets account for in the general fixed assets account group may be depreciated although they are not required to be.

    I'm not sure if this is an old TBS from Roger or what? I'm hoping one of you might know. I thought everything in a governmental fund was just an expenditure, so what in the heck is the term “general fixed assets account group” I looked this up in my text and nothing is mentioned. Then I did some research In my class textbook and came up with this:

    “An accounting entity with a set of accounts that is self-balancing and is used to account for a government’s general fixed assets or general long-term obligations. Account groups are distinguished from funds in that they are not used to account for sources, uses, and balances of expendable available financial resources. Account groups were an integral part of the ‘‘old’’ accounting model; they are no longer needed under the model prescribed by GASB Statement No. 34.”

    So, I'm assume this term is no longer used and need not worried about it?

    BEC 2/26/2016 81
    FAR 05/2016

    Purely Roger CPA Review, for now!

    #765158
    Zyx
    Participant

    MaLoTu & Spartans92, I don't an example. It is just stuck in my head and I keep thinking it does not really make sense to me to estimate an uncollectable allowance then reverse cash and AR. I use T-acount, yes it is helpful! When I have an example related to this topic, I'll post it later. Thanks lot!

    This question below; Is it just wording problem I misunderstand? If it really means income tax expense, it should be $0 because of the carry back from 20×2. If “income tax expense” also means refundable, it can trigger us to make a stupid mistake and miss an easy point.

    Venus Corp.'s worksheet for calculating current and deferred income taxes for 20X1 follows:

    20X1 20X2 20X3
    ——- ——- ——-
    Pretax income $1,400 0 0
    Temporary differences:
    Depreciation (800) (1,200) $2,000
    Warranty costs 400 (100) (300)
    ——- ——- ——-
    Taxable income $1,000 (1,300) 1,700

    Loss carryback (1,000) 1,000
    Loss carryforward 300 (300)
    ——- ——- ——-
    $ 0 $ 0 $1,400
    ======= ======= =======
    Enacted rate 30% 30% 25%
    Deferred tax liability
    (asset):
    Current $ (300)
    =======
    Noncurrent $ 350
    =======
    Venus had no prior deferred tax balances. In its 20X1 income statement, what amount should Venus report as current income tax expense?

    A.$420

    B.$350

    C.$300

    D.$0

    I picked D but the answer is C.
    The amount of income taxes paid or payable (or refundable) for a year is determined by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues for that year.
    Current income tax expense = 30% × $1,000 = $300

    REG: 77 x2
    BEC: 81 x3
    FAR: 68 retake 10/1
    AUD: 8/27

    #765159
    SONA
    Participant

    Baker Co. began its operations during the current year. The following is
    Baker's balance sheet at December 31:
    Baker Co.
    Balance Sheet
    Assets
    Cash $192,000
    Accounts receivable 82,000
    Total assets $274,000
    Liabilities and stockholders' equity
    Accounts payable $24,000
    Common stock 200,000
    Retained earnings 50,000
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $274,000
    Baker's net income for the current year was $78,000 and dividends of
    $28,000 were declared and paid. Common stock was issued for $200,000.
    What amount should Baker report as cash provided by operating activities in
    its statement of cash flows for the current year under U.S. GAAP?
    a. $50,000
    b. $250,000
    c. $192,000
    d. $20,000

    D is the correct answer.
    Explanation
    Choice “d” is correct. Cash provided by operating activities is $20,000,
    computed as follows under the U.S. GAAP indirect method:
    Net income 78,000
    Increase in accounts receivable (82,000)
    Increase in accounts payable 24,000
    Cash provided by operating activities 20,000
    Note that under IFRS, an entity may report dividends paid in operating
    activities.

    Can anyone tell me if not give how would i consider it as increase in A/R and increase in A/P.

    #765160
    KJ
    Participant

    @ SONA, If I am not wrong, when the question does not specifically says Direct Method and/or Increase/Decrease is not given, you assume it is asking you to compute with Indirect method. But I guess someone who is already given FAR exam probably will shed more light on this.

    FAR - August 2016
    AUD - September 2016
    REG - October 2016
    BEC - November 2016

    Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

    #765161
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Facts: Olinto Corporation (subsidiary) sold equipment on January 1, Year 1 to Gearty Corporation (parent) for $100,000. The equipment had a net book value of $70,000 (cost of $90,000 and accumulated depreciation of $20,000), and a remaining life of ten years. January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the sale on Olinto's books:

    DR: Cash $100,000

    DR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000

    CR: Machinery (original cost) $90,000

    CR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000

    January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the purchase on Gearty's books:

    DR: Machinery $100,000

    CR: Cash $100,000

    December 31, Year 1 journal entry to record the depreciation on Gearty's books:

    DR: Depreciation expense ($100,000/10) $10,000

    CR: Accumulated depreciation $10,000

    December 31, Year 1 workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of intercompany gain and adjustment of the machine and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original balance:

    DR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000

    CR: Machinery ($100,000 – $90,000) $10,000

    CR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000

    The depreciation expense recorded by Gearty is overstated by the intercompany profit included in the cost of the machinery.

    Workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of excess depreciation :

    DR: Accumulated depreciation $3,000

    CR: Depreciation expense $3,000

    I desperately need help understanding this problem. It's an example from pg. 50 of 2014 Becker FAR. I get everything except for the first 12/31/Y1 elimination entry involving machinery and acc. dep. Can someone please explain to me how a credit entry of 20,000 adjusts the acc. dep. to its original balance? I get that for machinery, 100-90-10(elimination entry)=0. But for acc. dep., 10-20+20=10. Please help! Thank you!

    #765162
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Just popping in to wish you GOOD LUCK tomorrow @Just3Letters!!! You got this!

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #765163
    marqzho
    Participant

    Good Luck !Just3Letters

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #765164
    Claudia408
    Participant

    Good luck Just3! Can't wait to hear about it! lol

    marqzho – do you still remember REG? 🙂

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #765165
    marqzho
    Participant

    Claudia408

    not much. Why?

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #765166
    SONA
    Participant

    Hi,

    Is anyone watching FAR Ninja Blitz?

    #765167
    JT
    Participant

    I use ninja blitz for my final-final-final review maybe like 2-3 days before my exam.

    I wouldn't be using it by itself if I were to initially learn the material.

    REG-80-1X
    BEC-80-1X
    FAR-73-1X
    FAR-75-2X
    AUD-September 2016

    #765168
    SONA
    Participant

    Yes, you are right.

    Now i have just two weeks for the exam. I finished all becker yesterday and was going to start ninja mcq. Before i start ninja mcq i saw ninja blitz. So i think i will watching all of them today and then starting my practice.

    #765169
    pickanicken
    Participant

    Thoughts on the importance of business combinations – intraentity eliminations? I feel like I have a good understanding of the topic but then I bomb the MCQ. Should I spend more time or move on?

    REG - 81
    BEC - 83
    AUD - 86
    FAR - 78 (Done!)

    #765170
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    pickanicken – move on and come back to it during the review. I don't know how important it is … every test varies so greatly. I can't imagine having more than one question related to it.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 2,358 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 100’ is closed to new replies.