- This topic has 2,358 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
lolo.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 18, 2016 at 4:43 am #200895
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 11, 2016 at 10:21 pm #765156
patelhj1ParticipantI have roughly the 14 days also, and currently what I am doing is re-reading and re-doing all the MCQ per chapter per day. I finished F1 yesterday and I'm on F2 today….. (using becker)
Good idea or bad idea?
BEC 78 08/2015
REG 71 11/2015, RETAKE 83 01/2016
FAR 75! 5/2016
AUD ? 8/2016Becker with Nonstop NINJA MCQ
Google most difficult professional examMay 12, 2016 at 12:32 am #765157
MoeshowParticipantGovernmental accounting question hoping someone might know.
—Both refer to governmental fund capital project fund
8. In the general fixed assets account group, should a credit amount be recorded for 20X4 in “Investment in general fixed assets—capital projects fund�
Answer- The civic center reconstruction will be recorded in the general fixed assets account group with a debit to the asset account and a credit to investment in general fixed assets- capital projects fund.
9. In the general fixed assets account group, could Bel elect to record depreciation in 20X5 on the civic center?
Answer- Assets account for in the general fixed assets account group may be depreciated although they are not required to be.I'm not sure if this is an old TBS from Roger or what? I'm hoping one of you might know. I thought everything in a governmental fund was just an expenditure, so what in the heck is the term “general fixed assets account group” I looked this up in my text and nothing is mentioned. Then I did some research In my class textbook and came up with this:
“An accounting entity with a set of accounts that is self-balancing and is used to account for a government’s general fixed assets or general long-term obligations. Account groups are distinguished from funds in that they are not used to account for sources, uses, and balances of expendable available financial resources. Account groups were an integral part of the ‘‘old’’ accounting model; they are no longer needed under the model prescribed by GASB Statement No. 34.”
So, I'm assume this term is no longer used and need not worried about it?
BEC 2/26/2016 81
FAR 05/2016Purely Roger CPA Review, for now!
May 12, 2016 at 12:56 am #765158
ZyxParticipantMaLoTu & Spartans92, I don't an example. It is just stuck in my head and I keep thinking it does not really make sense to me to estimate an uncollectable allowance then reverse cash and AR. I use T-acount, yes it is helpful! When I have an example related to this topic, I'll post it later. Thanks lot!
This question below; Is it just wording problem I misunderstand? If it really means income tax expense, it should be $0 because of the carry back from 20×2. If “income tax expense” also means refundable, it can trigger us to make a stupid mistake and miss an easy point.
Venus Corp.'s worksheet for calculating current and deferred income taxes for 20X1 follows:
20X1 20X2 20X3
——- ——- ——-
Pretax income $1,400 0 0
Temporary differences:
Depreciation (800) (1,200) $2,000
Warranty costs 400 (100) (300)
——- ——- ——-
Taxable income $1,000 (1,300) 1,700Loss carryback (1,000) 1,000
Loss carryforward 300 (300)
——- ——- ——-
$ 0 $ 0 $1,400
======= ======= =======
Enacted rate 30% 30% 25%
Deferred tax liability
(asset):
Current $ (300)
=======
Noncurrent $ 350
=======
Venus had no prior deferred tax balances. In its 20X1 income statement, what amount should Venus report as current income tax expense?A.$420
B.$350
C.$300
D.$0
I picked D but the answer is C.
The amount of income taxes paid or payable (or refundable) for a year is determined by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues for that year.
Current income tax expense = 30% × $1,000 = $300REG: 77 x2
BEC: 81 x3
FAR: 68 retake 10/1
AUD: 8/27May 12, 2016 at 3:23 am #765159
SONAParticipantBaker Co. began its operations during the current year. The following is
Baker's balance sheet at December 31:
Baker Co.
Balance Sheet
Assets
Cash $192,000
Accounts receivable 82,000
Total assets $274,000
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Accounts payable $24,000
Common stock 200,000
Retained earnings 50,000
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $274,000
Baker's net income for the current year was $78,000 and dividends of
$28,000 were declared and paid. Common stock was issued for $200,000.
What amount should Baker report as cash provided by operating activities in
its statement of cash flows for the current year under U.S. GAAP?
a. $50,000
b. $250,000
c. $192,000
d. $20,000D is the correct answer.
Explanation
Choice “d” is correct. Cash provided by operating activities is $20,000,
computed as follows under the U.S. GAAP indirect method:
Net income 78,000
Increase in accounts receivable (82,000)
Increase in accounts payable 24,000
Cash provided by operating activities 20,000
Note that under IFRS, an entity may report dividends paid in operating
activities.Can anyone tell me if not give how would i consider it as increase in A/R and increase in A/P.
May 12, 2016 at 3:49 am #765160
KJParticipant@ SONA, If I am not wrong, when the question does not specifically says Direct Method and/or Increase/Decrease is not given, you assume it is asking you to compute with Indirect method. But I guess someone who is already given FAR exam probably will shed more light on this.
FAR - August 2016
AUD - September 2016
REG - October 2016
BEC - November 2016Remember: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
May 12, 2016 at 6:38 am #765161
AnonymousInactiveFacts: Olinto Corporation (subsidiary) sold equipment on January 1, Year 1 to Gearty Corporation (parent) for $100,000. The equipment had a net book value of $70,000 (cost of $90,000 and accumulated depreciation of $20,000), and a remaining life of ten years. January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the sale on Olinto's books:
DR: Cash $100,000
DR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000
CR: Machinery (original cost) $90,000
CR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000
January 1, Year 1 journal entry to record the purchase on Gearty's books:
DR: Machinery $100,000
CR: Cash $100,000
December 31, Year 1 journal entry to record the depreciation on Gearty's books:
DR: Depreciation expense ($100,000/10) $10,000
CR: Accumulated depreciation $10,000
December 31, Year 1 workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of intercompany gain and adjustment of the machine and accumulated depreciation accounts to their original balance:
DR: Intercompany gain on sale of machinery $30,000
CR: Machinery ($100,000 – $90,000) $10,000
CR: Accumulated depreciation $20,000
The depreciation expense recorded by Gearty is overstated by the intercompany profit included in the cost of the machinery.
Workpaper elimination entry- Elimination of excess depreciation :
DR: Accumulated depreciation $3,000
CR: Depreciation expense $3,000
I desperately need help understanding this problem. It's an example from pg. 50 of 2014 Becker FAR. I get everything except for the first 12/31/Y1 elimination entry involving machinery and acc. dep. Can someone please explain to me how a credit entry of 20,000 adjusts the acc. dep. to its original balance? I get that for machinery, 100-90-10(elimination entry)=0. But for acc. dep., 10-20+20=10. Please help! Thank you!
May 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm #765162
mckan514wParticipantJust popping in to wish you GOOD LUCK tomorrow @Just3Letters!!! You got this!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2May 12, 2016 at 3:21 pm #765163
marqzhoParticipantGood Luck !Just3Letters
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84May 12, 2016 at 3:37 pm #765164
Claudia408ParticipantGood luck Just3! Can't wait to hear about it! lol
marqzho – do you still remember REG? 🙂
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8May 12, 2016 at 4:39 pm #765165
marqzhoParticipantClaudia408
not much. Why?
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84May 12, 2016 at 5:43 pm #765166May 12, 2016 at 6:51 pm #765167
JTParticipantMay 12, 2016 at 7:09 pm #765168
SONAParticipantMay 12, 2016 at 7:31 pm #765169
pickanickenParticipantThoughts on the importance of business combinations – intraentity eliminations? I feel like I have a good understanding of the topic but then I bomb the MCQ. Should I spend more time or move on?
REG - 81
BEC - 83
AUD - 86
FAR - 78 (Done!)May 12, 2016 at 8:08 pm #765170
MaLoTuParticipantpickanicken – move on and come back to it during the review. I don't know how important it is … every test varies so greatly. I can't imagine having more than one question related to it.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q2 2016 - Page 100’ is closed to new replies.
