FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 97

Viewing 15 replies - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 2,502 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1493940
    Holly
    Participant

    I am so disappointed in my trending score in NINJA! 68

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1493956
    T Rev
    Participant

    @HRSexton You can get your trending score up by working the “missed last time seen” questions. I do a good 20 or 30 of them at the end of a day's study session to shore up the concepts while the critical thinking steps are still in my mind from when i got it wrong. If you are worried that this will skew your measure of how prepared you actually are, then you should really be going by your average score shown in the progress report.

    I like to think of the trending score as how well I have mastered the material presented to me so far, as opposed to the entire FAR body of knowledge.

    #1494043
    mckan514w
    Participant

    I haven't seen a question on this but an answer from another question made me wonder- in Non-Profit- you are suppose to report any pledges / unconditional promises expected to be collected within one year net of estimated uncollectibles… The explanation goes on to say that if the pledge is expected to be collected over multiple periods it should be reported at its PV. Would that be the Present Value of the Net? For instance you receive a pledge of 200 to be given to you over a period of three years and you estimate 5% of it will be uncollected– so would you report at the Present Value of 200 or 190??

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1494051
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    probably PV of net

    #1494055
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    less than 48 hours away,,,my anxiety is thru the roof,,stressin harddd

    #1494063
    mckan514w
    Participant

    ooh GOOD LUCK Sticky!!! You totally have this!!! (and agree that I think it is probably PV of net- but geeeesh one never knows 🙂 …..

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1494114
    cdn
    Participant

    So I just did 1st final review for Becker- and did so poor on MCQ and good on SIM – and exam in 2 weeks. Feeling very disappointed:(

    #1494117
    Iceman6
    Participant

    Good luck Sticky! Hopefully all of us that have FAR left see a passing score and can be done with this whole exam

    #1494133
    aatoural
    Participant

    @Sticky – GOOD LUCK! You got this!!!

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1494202
    GiniC
    Participant

    @mckan514w and @Sticky Nicky –

    I haven't seen them combine those either (hopefully only one of the answers will be in the choices!!!) but based on other receivables, I would say PV of gross. You don't reduce the value of a note receivable before calculating the PV to record it, and pledges are basically the same thing – except that what you count as interest for the note you count as contribution revenue for the pledge.

    #1494214
    GiniC
    Participant

    @mckan514w – on the OCI/AOCI topic – there is a CHOICE about displaying Comprehensive Income at the bottom of the Income Statement, or presenting a separate, independent Statement of Comprehensive Income – so Sticky was right about option b being wrong because the separate statement is optional not required; C and D are definitely wrong (AOCI is part of equity, not the other way around; and comprehensive income is part of income statements (whichever presentation) for all reporting periods) so A has to be the correct choice.

    #1494217
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    Where does this question say that the donor stipulated the principle be held? Stupid

    Alpha Hospital, a large not-for-profit entity, has adopted an accounting policy that does not imply a time restriction on gifts of long-lived assets. Alpha received investments subject to the donor's requirement that investment income be used to pay for outpatient services. Indicate the manner in which this transaction affects Alpha's financial statements.

    Incorrect A.
    Increase in unrestricted revenues, gains, and other support

    B.
    Increase in temporarily restricted net assets

    C.
    Increase in permanently restricted net assets

    D.
    No required reportable event

    Explanation
    When investments are donated and the principal of those funds cannot be expended, those investments are permanently restricted. Therefore, Alpha must record an increase in its permanently restricted net assets.

    #1494225
    GiniC
    Participant

    @Sticky Nicky –

    When they stipulate that the income is to be used for a specific purpose, that USUALLY means the investment itself can't be sold off – or else there would be no income to use for the specified purpose. Not always, but more often than not.

    #1494231
    waffle_house
    Participant

    @Sticky Nicky

    “received investments subject to the donor’s requirement that investment income be used to pay for outpatient services” – permanently restricted because the principle will remain but any income from the investment goes to temp restricted.

    Any donor stipulation I would assume permanently restriction unless time passage will lift the restriction then I assume temporary restriction (even if 20 years down the road).

    #1494232
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    yes i know but they usually say the principle cannot be spent,,,this is the only one where it doesnt…i figured since it was never stipulated it can be unrestricted,,,ive seen questions that say the investment can be sold

Viewing 15 replies - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 2,502 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 97’ is closed to new replies.