FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 93

Viewing 15 replies - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 2,502 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1492731
    norseman88
    Participant

    @iceman6 good luck!

    #1492755
    Iceman6
    Participant

    Thanks all. Will report back with my exam experience. (After having a burger and a nice whiskey for lunch)

    #1492759
    aatoural
    Participant

    good luck

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1492777
    Holly
    Participant

    Dahl Co. traded a delivery van and $5,000 cash for a newer van owned by West Corp. The following information relates to the values of the vans on the exchange date:

    Carrying Value Fair Value
    ————– ———-
    Old van $30,000 $45,000
    New van 40,000 50,000

    Dahl's income tax rate is 30%. What amounts should Dahl report as gain on exchange of the vans?

    Why does this transaction have commercial substance?

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1492783
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    bc he gave cash,,,which means cash flow changed

    #1492797
    Holly
    Participant

    There are examples in Becker where cash and a machine was traded??? I'm having a real problem understanding this stuff.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1492800
    Holly
    Participant

    let me finish… where cash was traded with a machine AND considered lacking commercial substance.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1492824
    norseman88
    Participant

    @HRSexton, is answer 15k?

    #1492840
    GiniC
    Participant

    @iceman6 GOOD LUCK!!!! 🙂

    #1492848
    GiniC
    Participant

    @aatoural – You need one of the post-its on the side of my monitor: DATES, DAMMIT!!.

    The new stock was sold on April 1, so it only counted for 9 of 12 months. 9/12 x 8000 shares = 6000 shares added to the original 50,000.

    I don't remember which method was “first” and “second”, so the other way –

    50,000 total shares Jan-Mar x 3/12 = 12,500
    58,000 total shares Apr-Dec x 9/12 = 43,500
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .WACSO = 56,000

    #1492857
    GiniC
    Participant

    @HRSexton – as I read it, since future cash flows will not change, the transaction lacks commercial substance. No boot received = no gain recognized. What is the answer?

    Unless the new van, with a longer expected life, will bring in more delivery charges and therefore change the future cash flows?

    DR new van………..50,000 (FV of consideration given)
    …CR old van (NBV)……..30,000
    …DR Cash given…………5,000
    …CR gain……………..15,000 (plug)

    According to Becker, the cash exchanged has no bearing on gain or loss – but it has to show up in the journal entries for the books to balance. (see the Pass Key on pg F2-36)

    #1492866
    Holly
    Participant

    @ginic & @ norseman88 $15k because it has commercial substance

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1493044
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    254 in FAR, 255 in BEC…what a weekend!

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #1493094
    Holly
    Participant

    @mtaylo24 Impressive!

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1493095
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Good luck today @iceman!!!

    @hr- that question is awful!!! all three of my test banks has it- one explained that it has commercial substance because a new truck would be more efficient / change the cash flow substantially compared to the old one….. GRRRRRRRRRRRR

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

Viewing 15 replies - 1,381 through 1,395 (of 2,502 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 93’ is closed to new replies.