- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 13, 2017 at 9:03 pm #1477606
Sticky NickyParticipantaatoural: Its like this…take the number of the warrants and multiply it by the warrant market price (2000 x $10) which is $20k if you look there is a discount of $50 $500-450 however this is a distorted discount you need to further increase the discount by the value of the warrants 20k….50+20=70…the real carrying value of the bonds is $430 here are the JE for this problem also:
Cash 450
Discount 70 (plug)
B/P 500
APIC-warrants 20February 13, 2017 at 9:05 pm #1477614
AnthonyParticipantFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:05 pm #1477617
Sticky NickyParticipantjournal entries truly are the key to this section…once you know the entries it gets so much easier to find what they are asking you for.
February 13, 2017 at 9:06 pm #1477618
ng3926aParticipantI think if you write out the JE it will help
DR Cash for $450,000
DR Discount for $70,000 <—- PLUG
CR Debentures/Bonds for $500,000
CR PIC- Warrants for $20,000
If we know the FV of the warrants, we use that was PIC. Really what they're saying is that the purchasers paid $450,000 – nothing more and nothing less, but really what did they get in total? They got debentures worth $500,000 and Warrants worth $20,000. So if they paid 450,000 for something that is really worth $520,000. What's the discount they received? $70,000.
edit// hahah I guess we're all in agreement about J/E…
February 13, 2017 at 9:07 pm #1477623
demarconParticipant@Nathalia you should use the actual and defer a gain, but that would only be in a hard question where they try to trick you with a corridor approach question.
@aatoural you have to record detachable stock warrants at their FV. You would record the bonds as BP at their face amount and you can usually just plug the discount.dr. Cash 450,000
dr. Discount 70,000 (plug)
cr. Bonds Payable $500,000 (face)
cr. APIC – Stock Warrants $20,000 ($10 FV x 2000 warrants)February 13, 2017 at 9:21 pm #1477641
aatouralParticipantOMG! Thanks everyone!
I really need to get that JE learned. I think what throws me off is the APIC part of it. I've always had trouble with that concept
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:53 pm #1477668
ng3926aParticipantI noticed we all credited a different item for warrants.. so which one is right? whats the difference between pic and apic?
February 13, 2017 at 10:05 pm #1477674
demarconParticipantI'm pretty sure PIC is the right one. APIC is the additional amount paid over par. PIC is the total investment in stock and APIC.
February 13, 2017 at 10:05 pm #1477675
Sticky NickyParticipantits APIC-Stock Warrants,,,APIC-Warrants same thing,,,no such thing as PIC
February 13, 2017 at 10:07 pm #1477680
Sticky NickyParticipantno its additional paid in capital,,,where in a balance sheet do you report PIC? never even heard of that before in my studies…i think the two are interchangable
February 13, 2017 at 11:47 pm #1477729
YBD215ParticipantKent Co., a division of National Realty, Inc., maintains escrow accounts and pays real estate taxes for National's mortgage customers. Escrow funds are kept in interest-bearing accounts. Interest, less a 10% service fee, is credited to the mortgagee's account and used to reduce future escrow payments. Additional information follows:
Escrow accounts liability, January 1, 20X1 $ 700,000
Escrow payments received during 20X1 1,580,000
Real estate taxes paid during 20X1 1,720,000
Interest on escrow funds during 20X1 50,000
What amount should Kent report as escrow accounts liability in its December 31, 20X1, balance sheet?A. $510,000
B. $515,000
C. $605,000 Correct
D. $610,000
Explanation:Use the basic accounting equation:
Beginning balance + Additions – Deductions = Ending balance
Escrow accounts liability on January 1, 20X1 $ 700,000
Add: Escrow payments received in 20X1 1,580,000
Net interest credited ($50,000 – 10% of $50,000) 45,000
———-
Subtotal $2,325,000
Less: Real estate taxes paid in 20X1 1,720,000
———-
Escrow accounts liability on December 31, 20X1 $ 605,000
==========I thought that since the interesrt was used to reduce future payment, it would be deduction from the liability. Can someone explain my stupidity. What am I missing in the details?
February 13, 2017 at 11:54 pm #1477737
waffle_houseParticipantIs GAAP FIFO lower of cost or NRV?
February 13, 2017 at 11:57 pm #1477740
waffle_houseParticipantI took my exam today. I think I am screwed. The first testlet was super easy and I knew I was gonna get harder the second testlet but damn it was tough and that was when I got scared. I'm not even sure how to rate the third testlet, it was definitely harder than my first testlet but not as wordy as the second testlet.
The SIMS weren't too bad (surprisingly). I think I made a lot of little mistakes. Guess we will see Feb 23th.
Please let this be my last exam.
February 14, 2017 at 5:39 am #1477792
HollyParticipant@YBD215 I totally see what you're saying, but when I read it I thought of it as the same as the $1,580,000 – payment received but just not out of our pocket.
@waffle_house GAAP FIFO is lower of cost and NRV but this has been a pain in our sidesBEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16February 14, 2017 at 7:32 am #1477810
mckan514wParticipant@mtaylo24- spent last week doing nothing but note review and started Ninja yesterday and OMG it is like a breath of fresh air from Gleim- even to the point I am beginning to wonder if I messed up rescheduling my test now….
I agree with @sticky JE's are KEY to FAR…
@Wafflehouse- actually sounds like you did pretty good! deep breaths no use obsessing about it until scores come out you never know. Good luck fingers crossed for you!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 80’ is closed to new replies.
