- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 8, 2017 at 6:02 pm #1508809
GiniCParticipantFirst item – small stock dividends come out of retained earnings at FAIR VALUE, so
DR Retained earnings FV of stock being issued
……CR CS _________________________________ par value of CS
……CR APIC CS ____________________________ plugLarge stock dividends come out of retained earnings at par value, so
DR Retained Earnings ____ par value
……CR CS _____________________Par valueMarch 8, 2017 at 6:04 pm #1508815
nalratossParticipant…………………………………..
March 8, 2017 at 6:17 pm #1508835
GiniCParticipant@mckan514w – the “Fair Value Option” question
Becker only has a brief section on this. It says basically what you said, but a little more. The fair value option can only be elected on specific dates
– when it first recognizes the eligible instrument
– on the date it becomes subject to equity method
– on the date it ceases to consolidate.Also, once that election is made, it is irrevocable.
IFRS note – Fair Value option can only be elected if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would arise from using another method.
March 8, 2017 at 6:38 pm #1508869
mckan514wParticipantThanks Gini C- that confirms everything I was thinking 🙂 Good Luck tomorrow!
I am done… will update everyone once I return tomorrow- for those still plugging away- make tomorrow count!!!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 8, 2017 at 6:44 pm #1508889
GiniCParticipant@mckan514w – Third one – partnerships – there are three methods for calculating basis for a new partner.
Exact method – when the new partner's share is equal to his/her book value coming in – straight and simple
Bonus method – bonus can go to new partner OR to existing partners! mnemonic Bonus = Balance in total cap accounts controls allocation
– if the new partner pays more than would be his/her percent ownership in the entity, part of his/her contribution is given to the existing partners as bonuses, in proportion to their profit/loss ratio
– if the new partner pays less than would be his/her percent ownership, bonus comes from the existing to the new, again according to profit & loss ratio.
Goodwill method – mnemonic Goodwill = Going in investment controls cap accounts & goodwill calculation. The new partner's contribution (greater than his/her NBV) implies a total value for the partnership – say I put in 35,000 for 1/3 ownership, that implies the whole entity's value is 105,000. Add up the partners' capital and subtract from the new total value, that's the goodwill added. That goodwill then gets credited t the capital accounts of the existing partners by their profit & loss ratios. Journal entry for that one (hopefully it clarifies) when existing partners have A 30,000 and B 10,000 with a 60:40 ratio:
DR Cash incoming ________________ 35,000
DR Goodwill _____________________ 30,000
……CR A Capital (60% x 30,000) _________ 18,000
……CR B Capital (40% x 30,000) _________ 12,000
……CR C Capital (new guy) ______________ 35,000This looks kinda like the bonus method with bonus to existing partners, but it adds value instead of distributing the existing money.
Hope that helps rather than confuses…
March 8, 2017 at 8:01 pm #1508985
GiniCParticipantOne more factoid, since I missed the same question twice for not keeping it straight:
Large Accelerated filers – Outstanding common equity of $700 Million or more – 10K within 60 days of year end, 10Q within 40 days
__ Accelerated filers __ Outstanding common equity between $75 & 700 Million – 10K within 75 days of year end, 10Q within 40 days
_____ all others _____________________________________________________________ 10K within 90 days of year end, 10Q within 45 daysMy head hurts. Need to settle it down for a decent sleep. Maybe just a couple sips of that honey brandy in the back of the cabinet…
March 8, 2017 at 8:28 pm #1509003
allstr921ParticipantGlad i took the exam today as a hail mary just to get a feel for it I feel like i dod really good on the mcq but struggled on the sims, which were much harder than the sims i tried in the ninja mcq, no ratios, no earnings per share questions. a couple topics i knew good enough to answer mcq but not for sims and i think thats where i got tripped up. Sales leaseback and component depreciation had some wrinkles that messed me up but will definitely study up on. i had one sim i never got to which was just poor management on me, i should have stopped the problem i was struggling on and completed it but lesson learned. gonna keep studying and wait for march 21st if i pass fantastic, if not ill be much more prepared for the retake
March 8, 2017 at 8:43 pm #1509015
NYaccountingstudentParticipantI have a questions from Becker Final Review about a EPS Simulaton
This was one of the facts:
$200,000 of bonds ($1000 par) convertible into common stock was issued March Year 3. The bond pays 3.75% and each convertible bond is convertible into 15 shares of common stock
In the solution they added the extra 3,000 shares into the denominator for the diluted EPS calculation.
How come they didnt added the $4,875 (200,000 x 3.75% x {1 – tax rate}) of saved interest expense to the numerator?
For anyone who has Becker Final Review is is Question #3 from Simulation 3
March 8, 2017 at 8:52 pm #1509025
GiniCParticipantMarch 8, 2017 at 8:53 pm #1509030
norseman88ParticipantJust got done, MCQ was a breeze for the most part, although spent a little bit too much time on them. Sims were on another level. All manual entry and multiple tabs which just ate away at my clock. Three of the sims were just from Mars. Heads up, DRS question will freeze your comp for a minute loading, make sure to factor that in. Would feel a lot better if I had 20 more min.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to show off my strong areas (EPS, Bonds, Depreciation, Inventory, Leases, Equity Securities, corrective J/Es)
Wait and see at this point, finger shot crossed for now.
March 8, 2017 at 9:12 pm #1509042
NYaccountingstudentParticipantDoes every test have a DRS question?
I havent studied or looked at DRS at all—-I got a DRS question on my audit exam and luckily I found the answer in the AL word for word
March 8, 2017 at 9:23 pm #1509045
allstr921Participant@norseman88 i felt the same way. Sims were monsters, was feeling great through mcqs and had 1.5hrs left for sims and still didnt finish them all throughly
March 8, 2017 at 9:32 pm #1509054
NamstutParticipantI am getting waves of nausea just thinking about the exam! I am wasting my time here when I should be working MCQs until my eyes pop.
I have never been so unprepared, I used to be a 4.0 GPA student back in the day but this CPA study experience is very challenging and humbling (excruciating and painful!!).
@norseman88 and @allstr921, I truly hope that both of you will come out of the other side of FAR on the 21!!AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDMarch 8, 2017 at 9:43 pm #1509070
allstr921Participant@namstut thanks, good luck on your exam. make sure you really know your journal entries
March 8, 2017 at 9:49 pm #1509082
NamstutParticipant@allstr921 THANK YOU! I am going to make it a priority! 🙂
my earlier post should have said “come out on the other side”, not “of the other side” but take is as you wish! LOL!!! 🙂
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBD -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 157’ is closed to new replies.
