- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 5, 2017 at 3:59 am #1504648
norseman88ParticipantWere you able to find anything in the codification for the enterprise sim? I was looking and couldn't find anything around the SOCF requirements for Enterprise.
March 5, 2017 at 4:40 am #1504650
NamstutParticipantUnless I am going crazy, there are no codifications for GASB in the AL, FASB only. This one was terrible! I am going to try and redo it again tomorrow.
Working NFP SIMs. Not sure how much of it could show up on the test.
What time zone are you in?
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDMarch 5, 2017 at 6:22 am #1504653
mckan514wParticipantembarrassed to admit this but I have gone the depends route- too afraid of running out of time- I guess the good news with the new exam is I think I read breaks will now not count against your time- such an asinine rule that makes the exam even more stressful- and for the record- no thankfully I have never had to “employ” the depends- and yes I “practiced” wearing them before hand- ha ha ha ha… but it does make me feel better knowing that they are there- ha ha ha ha ha #shamefulcpasecrets
I'm East Coast time- how about you? I have been praying nightly that I don't get a govt SIM this go round… they are the worst and will all but guarantee me another fail π
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 5, 2017 at 6:31 am #1504659
NamstutParticipantHahahaha!! They should have a depends dispenser in the bathroom in every Prometrics center! π
I am in Mountain time zone. It's 4:30 am and I am thinking if I should even bother going to sleep at this point.
I just worked through 3 SIMs testlets on GOV and NFP in Becker ch9, but most of them are on NFP! WTF??
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDMarch 5, 2017 at 6:39 am #1504662
mckan514wParticipanthave tomorrow earmarked for another round of Govt and NFP- my first exam it seems like this was 50% of it including SIMs…. of course second go round I think I only saw about 6 questions on both topics…. just FML…
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 5, 2017 at 6:50 am #1504665
HollyParticipantMan y'all are hoping on here this morning. I'm just getting started.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 5, 2017 at 6:51 am #1504668
NamstutParticipantOk, I am giving up and I am going to take a nap. π
I haven't touched IFRS yet, and I didn't do any of the SIMs on Leases, Liabilities & Bonds, Working Capital & Fixed Assets, and Stockholders' Equity, Cash Flows & Ratios. I am planning on working through some of them tomorrow. Then Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday – MCQs and reviewing notes.
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDMarch 5, 2017 at 6:52 am #1504671
NamstutParticipant@HRSexton, I haven't even gone to bed yet! LOL!
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBDMarch 5, 2017 at 6:55 am #1504672
HollyParticipantI'm so jealous of those of you who can study in the hours where there's nothing else to disturb you.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 5, 2017 at 7:31 am #1504677
mckan514wParticipantI am to HR- but I just can not stay up- I need my sleep or my brain is worthless- thankfully I am / have always been a morning person
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 5, 2017 at 9:04 am #1504714
HollyParticipant10. During 20X2, Quo increased its investment in Worth, Inc. from a 10% interest, purchased in 20X1, to 30%, and acquired a seat on Worth's board of directors. As a result of its increased investment, Quo changed its method of accounting for investment in subsidiary from the cost method to the equity method. Retrospective approach
The change in the investment necessitating the use of the equity method of accounting for the investment is neither a change in accounting principle nor an accounting error but is recognized on a retrospective basis (FASB ASC 250-10-45-21).I thought that now we adopt the equity method as of the date of the change making retroactive adjustments no longer necessary??
The question is from NINJA Sim #30 question 10
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 5, 2017 at 9:31 am #1504725
HollyParticipantWhen y'all have academic questions with NINJA stuff, where do you send it to get an answer? I see where technical stuff goes but not academic.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16March 5, 2017 at 9:42 am #1504728
mckan514wParticipantcan someone help me parse out how to read this question— I answered zero because I thought the depreciation would be prospective so no adjustment they would just recognize the new amount this year- and that the error adjustment would be made to the 2001 statement not the 2002 / current statement because errors are retrospective…. according to the answer explanation this is all correct however somehow I was suppose to know that only a 2002 statement was presented???? What am I missing or doing wrong? Thanks!
Foy Corp. failed to accrue warranty costs of $50,000 in its December 31, 20X1, financial statements. In addition, a change from straight-line to accelerated depreciation made at the beginning of 20X2 resulted in a cumulative effect of $30,000 on Foy's retained earnings. Both the $50,000 and the $30,000 are net of related income taxes. What amount should Foy report as prior period adjustments in 20X2?
A. $0
B. $30,000
C. $50,000
D. $80,000Correct Answer C- FASB ASC 250-10-45-22 notes, βAny error in the financial statements of a prior period discovered after the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) shall be reported as an error correction, by restating the prior-period financial statements.β
Foy Corp.'s failure to accrue $50,000 of warranty cost in 20X1 is an error which should be reported in 20X2 as a prior period adjustment. (The change in depreciation is a change in accounting principle, shown on the income statement.)and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 5, 2017 at 10:07 am #1504746
GiniCParticipantMarch 5, 2017 at 10:08 am #1504749
mtaylo24Participant@mckan514w a change from straight line to accelerated is treated as a change in accounting estimate, so you have to do prospective application…
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16) -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 137’ is closed to new replies.
