FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 137

Viewing 15 replies - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 2,502 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1504648
    norseman88
    Participant

    Were you able to find anything in the codification for the enterprise sim? I was looking and couldn't find anything around the SOCF requirements for Enterprise.

    #1504650
    Namstut
    Participant

    Unless I am going crazy, there are no codifications for GASB in the AL, FASB only. This one was terrible! I am going to try and redo it again tomorrow.

    Working NFP SIMs. Not sure how much of it could show up on the test.

    What time zone are you in?

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1504653
    mckan514w
    Participant

    embarrassed to admit this but I have gone the depends route- too afraid of running out of time- I guess the good news with the new exam is I think I read breaks will now not count against your time- such an asinine rule that makes the exam even more stressful- and for the record- no thankfully I have never had to “employ” the depends- and yes I “practiced” wearing them before hand- ha ha ha ha… but it does make me feel better knowing that they are there- ha ha ha ha ha #shamefulcpasecrets

    I'm East Coast time- how about you? I have been praying nightly that I don't get a govt SIM this go round… they are the worst and will all but guarantee me another fail πŸ™

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1504659
    Namstut
    Participant

    Hahahaha!! They should have a depends dispenser in the bathroom in every Prometrics center! πŸ™‚

    I am in Mountain time zone. It's 4:30 am and I am thinking if I should even bother going to sleep at this point.

    I just worked through 3 SIMs testlets on GOV and NFP in Becker ch9, but most of them are on NFP! WTF??

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1504662
    mckan514w
    Participant

    have tomorrow earmarked for another round of Govt and NFP- my first exam it seems like this was 50% of it including SIMs…. of course second go round I think I only saw about 6 questions on both topics…. just FML…

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1504665
    Holly
    Participant

    Man y'all are hoping on here this morning. I'm just getting started.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1504668
    Namstut
    Participant

    Ok, I am giving up and I am going to take a nap. πŸ™‚

    I haven't touched IFRS yet, and I didn't do any of the SIMs on Leases, Liabilities & Bonds, Working Capital & Fixed Assets, and Stockholders' Equity, Cash Flows & Ratios. I am planning on working through some of them tomorrow. Then Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday – MCQs and reviewing notes.

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1504671
    Namstut
    Participant

    @HRSexton, I haven't even gone to bed yet! LOL!

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1504672
    Holly
    Participant

    I'm so jealous of those of you who can study in the hours where there's nothing else to disturb you.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1504677
    mckan514w
    Participant

    I am to HR- but I just can not stay up- I need my sleep or my brain is worthless- thankfully I am / have always been a morning person

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1504714
    Holly
    Participant

    10. During 20X2, Quo increased its investment in Worth, Inc. from a 10% interest, purchased in 20X1, to 30%, and acquired a seat on Worth's board of directors. As a result of its increased investment, Quo changed its method of accounting for investment in subsidiary from the cost method to the equity method. Retrospective approach
    The change in the investment necessitating the use of the equity method of accounting for the investment is neither a change in accounting principle nor an accounting error but is recognized on a retrospective basis (FASB ASC 250-10-45-21).

    I thought that now we adopt the equity method as of the date of the change making retroactive adjustments no longer necessary??

    The question is from NINJA Sim #30 question 10

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1504725
    Holly
    Participant

    When y'all have academic questions with NINJA stuff, where do you send it to get an answer? I see where technical stuff goes but not academic.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1504728
    mckan514w
    Participant

    can someone help me parse out how to read this question— I answered zero because I thought the depreciation would be prospective so no adjustment they would just recognize the new amount this year- and that the error adjustment would be made to the 2001 statement not the 2002 / current statement because errors are retrospective…. according to the answer explanation this is all correct however somehow I was suppose to know that only a 2002 statement was presented???? What am I missing or doing wrong? Thanks!

    Foy Corp. failed to accrue warranty costs of $50,000 in its December 31, 20X1, financial statements. In addition, a change from straight-line to accelerated depreciation made at the beginning of 20X2 resulted in a cumulative effect of $30,000 on Foy's retained earnings. Both the $50,000 and the $30,000 are net of related income taxes. What amount should Foy report as prior period adjustments in 20X2?
    A. $0
    B. $30,000
    C. $50,000
    D. $80,000

    Correct Answer C- FASB ASC 250-10-45-22 notes, β€œAny error in the financial statements of a prior period discovered after the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) shall be reported as an error correction, by restating the prior-period financial statements.”
    Foy Corp.'s failure to accrue $50,000 of warranty cost in 20X1 is an error which should be reported in 20X2 as a prior period adjustment. (The change in depreciation is a change in accounting principle, shown on the income statement.)

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1504746
    GiniC
    Participant

    @HRSexton – I don't have a Ninja subscription, but right under the login on the right there is a “Study Help” block with an “ASK JEFF” in green. Could that be it?

    #1504749
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    @mckan514w a change from straight line to accelerated is treated as a change in accounting estimate, so you have to do prospective application…

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

Viewing 15 replies - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 2,502 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 137’ is closed to new replies.