FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 120

Viewing 15 replies - 1,786 through 1,800 (of 2,502 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1501636
    GiniC
    Participant

    @aatoural – to answer without doing all the calculations:

    The call of the question is the impact 12/21/X1 (first year) and at maturity

    As HRSexton said, straight line will be easy 150000/6=25,000; if you do effective interest, you will multiply the market rate (12%) by the discounted PV, and the amortization will grow each period (because you're starting with a discounted (low priced) item and working toward the higher-priced item). So your initial effective calculation will be a smaller-than-average amount, making the straight-line addition much bigger than effective interest; therefore in year 1 the CV will be too high (overstated). The ending value should be no effect, because both methods bring you ultimately to the face value of the bond.

    #1501647
    aatoural
    Participant

    F5 – 39

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501650
    GiniC
    Participant

    @aatoural – are you trying to calculate the SL using 7 years? I initially glommed onto it as seven years but it's six, I have to count on my fingers – starts 1/2/x1, so
    X2 is 1,
    X3 = 2,
    x4=3,
    x5=4,
    x6=5,
    1/2/x7, maturity date, is 6 years.

    #1501651
    aatoural
    Participant

    I had done the Period Amortization exactly how you guys have explained, but I was going to do the interest expense as explain in F5 – 39 ( that amort table) but I was not getting it right.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501656
    GiniC
    Participant

    Page 43 isn't straight-line, it is effective interest with two payments per year, so you have to double the number of periods?

    #1501659
    aatoural
    Participant

    I'm in hell! 🙁

    On December 30, Year 1, Fort, Inc. issued 1,000 of its 8%, 10-year, $1,000 face value bonds with detachable stock warrants at par. Each bond carried a detachable warrant for one share of Fort's common stock at a specified option price of $25 per share. Immediately after issuance, the market value of the bonds without the warrants was $1,080,000 and the market value of the warrants was $120,000. In its December 31, Year 1, balance sheet, what amount should Fort report as bonds payable?

    a. $1,000,000

    b. $880,000

    c. $975,000

    d. $900,000

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501665
    aatoural
    Participant

    @ginic – I edited sorry I thought I had been fast enough. page 39

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501705
    GiniC
    Participant

    @aatoural – got it. Now what's confusing you on the straight-line?

    For the warrant:

    Because they gave you the market values of both the warrant and the bond, you have to allocate the amount between warrant and bond premium/discount values.
    Start with the basic journal entry:

    DR Cash (given as par value of the bonds) __ 1,000,000
    DR discount OR ______________________________ ???
    ……CR premium ________________________________ ???
    ……CR Bonds Payable (face value) _____________ 1,000,000
    ……CR APIC – Warrants ________________________ ???

    Total market value is 1,080,000+120,000=1,200,000.
    Bonds then are 1,080,000/1,200,000 or 90% of the proceeds, and warrants are the remaining 10%;
    so the warrants total value is 10% of the 1,000,000 proceeds or 100,000, and the bonds proceeds is 90% or 900,000 – so the bonds are sold at a discount of 100,000. They will list on the balance sheet as face net of discount, or 900,000.

    DR Cash (given as par value of the bonds) __ 1,000,000
    DR discount OR ______________________________ 100,000
    ……CR premium _______________________________ XXX
    ……CR Bonds Payable (face value) _____________ 1,000,000
    ……CR APIC – Warrants ________________________ 100,000

    #1501708
    aatoural
    Participant

    @ginic – I know. I feel like a disaster with these bonds. Now that I got effective interest method I never thought I would have trouble with S/L.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501726
    GiniC
    Participant

    @aatoural – so back looking at the straight-line table. You start with the PV of the bond, 926,395.00 The difference between that and face (1,000,000) is the amount you amortize over 10 periods, 1,000,000-926,395=73,605; divide by 10 is 7,360.50 each period.

    Now you're starting with a value BELOW face, so amortization will bring you TOWARD face, or up in value, so you add it to the carrying value each period. 926,392 + 7,360.50 = 933,755.50 – lather, rinse, repeat until you get to the face value.

    The “balance sheet” column reminds you that the bond issuer owes interest every month based on the face value and coupon rate, or 50,000 each month – that's the CASH that changes hands. However, they have to put that amortization in the books somewhere, so they tack it on to the interest payment each month and book a higher “interest expense” than the 50,000 cash amount – the expense shown in the Income Statement column.

    That difference is really the time value of money based on the market rate of interest instead of the coupon rate. When they purchaser pays a low price, they do it to earn a bigger return than the face rate would pay them, because the market is paying more for similar bonds. It takes so long to do all the legal/paper work to issue bonds though, that the issuer can't adjust the coupon rate fast enough to keep up with the market changes – so they sell the bonds at a higher or lower price so the return earned is with the market, in spite of what's written in the contracts and on the face.

    Helpful, or more confusing??

    #1501734
    aatoural
    Participant

    @ginic – you are bond genius! Thanks for both explanations. Warrants and S/L

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501743
    waffle_house
    Participant

    Good luck to all you regulars on this thread. You've worked hard, now all you have to do is believe in the studying and you'll do fine. Make sure your journal entry game is good and you'll be fine!

    The exam will throw a mixture of topics at you but to me the easiest points are the Gov and NFP because they are easy topics and easy points if studied. Also, do not discount IFRS they'll give a few questions on those.

    I went from a 72 to an 84 just by paying more attention to journal entries. Review your SIMs before heading into the exam, who knows you might see the exact same topic on your exam.

    #1501746
    aatoural
    Participant

    @ginic – so now analysing the second part of the warrants explanation. why is it that by finding the % of the total FV of bonds and warrants we assumed that the bonds were at discount?

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1501750
    norseman88
    Participant

    Because the bond was issued at par and there is a 1,000,000 bond payable credit + a 100,000 additional paid in capital credit on the warrants. Cash on proceeds is debited 1,000,000 so you need to credit a discount of 100,000 to balance the entries.

    #1501753
    norseman88
    Participant

    If the payable and warrants were less than the bond proceeds, you would then have a premium. When payable and warrants are more than the proceeds, you would have a discount.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,786 through 1,800 (of 2,502 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 120’ is closed to new replies.