- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 28, 2017 at 6:45 pm #1500955
norseman88Participant@Ginic That is exactly what I am doing and I agree with you. It is frustrating that you need to spend more time studying how they want questions answered, rather than answering them correctly. Wasted half my day on this crap.
February 28, 2017 at 6:47 pm #1500958
GiniCParticipantOK, the first thing that confused you – bonds issued with accrued interest: (sorry, started this before you posted the sample problem so I'll finish)
When a bond has interest due on July 1 and January 1, and delays make them issue the bond on September 1, they have to figure out how to deal with the interest payments. The way they do that is to figure out how much interest accrued since the last interest date (July 1) and the issue date (Sept 1) – two months' worth.
– The buyer adds that to the agreed-to purchase price, that's the “accrued interest”.
– On January 1 when the first actual interest payment is due, the seller/issuer will pay the whole six-month interest payment, even though the bond has only been “out there” for four months, because those first two months' interest were sort of refunded up-front as part of the purchase.Now I'll go look at that problem, unless someone else answers it before I get there.
February 28, 2017 at 6:52 pm #1500960
mckan514wParticipantTO record Income
DR Income Statement 80
CR Appropriations account 80To record Salary allowance
DR Appropriations Account 100
CR Partner account W 55
CR Partnership account R 45To distribute Loss
DR Partner Account W 12
DR Partner Account R 8
CR Appropriations Account 20This leaves your appropriations account with a zero balance and your Capital balances or W =43 and for R of 37
SO the net Debit / Credit (I agree it is a poor worded question but…) the Net Credit would be
DR Income Statement / Appropriations Account 80
CR Partnter Account W 43
CR Partner Account R 37and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 6:56 pm #1500964
mtaylo24Participant@aatoural, You have to start with the carrying amount and keep in mind that is after recording the discount (after the issuance), and you know we always add a discount and subtract a premium when we amortize, so they want you to back that out. $363,600-3,600 =360,000.
For accrued interest, they usually tell you when you issued and what the bonds are DATED (which is before the issuance for accrued interest), you have to account for that interest. I.e. Issued july 1, dated apr 1, accrued int is apr 1 – jun 30
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 28, 2017 at 6:56 pm #1500967
GiniCParticipant@aatoural, I think you're correct. When you set up your amortization table, you will start with a low carrying value and will add amortization each period to work the value UP to face. If your first amortization amount is $3600 and brings the carrying value UP to $363,600, then the carrying value at start is 363,600 – 3600 or 360,000. You're expecting it to be hard, and this one actually isn't.
February 28, 2017 at 6:57 pm #1500969
mtaylo24Participant@ginic jinx 😎
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 28, 2017 at 7:01 pm #1500978
aatouralParticipantThanks guys!!!
Yup it was correct. Now I am gonna try to read again about detachable warrants and see if I can do one on my own if not I keep asking. LOL
@Ginic – thanks for the explanation on the accrued interest that was helpful. Now when is bond issuance cost they stay as part of my beginning carrying amount?BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSFebruary 28, 2017 at 7:02 pm #1500979
GiniCParticipantAmong us, we'll give you enough approaches so you'll find the way that works for your brain. I hate memorizing and mix up whether to add or subtract, but I can always remember you amortize TOWARD the face value. So if you discounted the bond (just like a discount on cute shoes, that means you pay less for it than the manufacturer's price tag), you're going from the low price to the higher face value, so you have to add the amortization. If you paid a premium for those shoes at a fancy boutique in NYC, you are starting with a HIGH purchase price, and your amortization is going to bring the value DOWN toward the face value/price tag.
Hopefully shoes made you grin? I didn't discover a love of cute shoes until rather late in life…
February 28, 2017 at 7:09 pm #1500990
GiniCParticipantI think of bond issuance costs somewhat like the extra costs you pay to get a fixed asset ready to use – like installation costs for a machine – they become part of the cost of the bond, and you amortize them right in with the premium/discount.
There is argument at FASB about this (they think the issuance costs should be expensed) but the standard hasn't been changed, so that's the way to do it!
February 28, 2017 at 7:12 pm #1500991
GiniCParticipantkeep asking! I will feel better when I go back to statements of cash flows (I successfully avoided them all day today) and have to ask you just as many questions back. They TOTALLY make no sense to me!
February 28, 2017 at 7:16 pm #1500994
mckan514wParticipantLOL- I was typing out a whole thing for @aa and was re-reading it thinking “MUCH TOO TECHNICAL”- so scrapped it and just read the shoe analogy- which was pure perfection! and made me laugh (I also didn't discover the love of cute shoes until later in life)- 🙂
Ask away on bonds AND cash-flow- if only I could get an exam with nothing but those two topics and I would be golden- instead I just know I will get nothing but Government, Cash to accrual and Treasury stock questions… ha ha ha ha…
time to EAT!!! Good luck to all studying tonight- back at it in the am my headache has returned.
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 7:52 pm #1501015
cdnParticipantQuestion: I get mixed up with R&D – when expense and what staff to expense vs what capitalize/amortize? Any help?
February 28, 2017 at 8:04 pm #1501023
FalconsDawgs33ParticipantDoes anyone have like a comprehensive sample problem/case that covers Governmental Fund Accounting? This stuff is going over my head and I learn best by working through example problems to see how everything ties together and there aren't any sims for F8 that I can work through
February 28, 2017 at 8:27 pm #1501051
MscfisherParticipantDuring 20X1, Orca Corp. decided to change from the FIFO method of inventory valuation to the weighted-average method. Inventory balances under each method were as follows:
FIFO Weighted-Average
——- —————-
January 1, 20X1 $71,000 $77,000
December 31, 20X1 79,000 83,000
Orca's income tax rate is 30%.In its 20X1 financial statements, what amount should Orca report as the cumulative effect of this accounting change to be included in 20X1 net income?
A. $2,800
B. $4,000
C. $0
D. $6,000I DONT THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIS QUESTION IS ASKING
February 28, 2017 at 8:44 pm #1501060 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 116’ is closed to new replies.
