- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 28, 2017 at 7:50 am #1500448
GiniCParticipantYou use each year's ending inventory costs to create it's layer – UNLESS the inventory went DOWN (in base year $) in which case you don't have a layer for that year, you sold inventory from the prior year. This one is a little confusing because your FIRST year has a lower inventory, so your base year has to be reduced.
Base Yr Curr Yr____$Val Lifo
01/01/x0___90,000____90,000____90,000
X0 layer__does not exist, must reduce Base layer (you sold all of X0 inventory and some of prior years')
12/31/X0___20,000______________20,000
X1 layer___20,000__x2.0>>>_____40,000 Base yr x X1 index = X1 layer
12/31/X1__40,000____80,000_____60,000 80/40=2; X0 end(20K)-X1 end(40K) = 20K; X0 (reduced base) layer + X1 layer = X1 end at $Value LIFOThere's a really good example here, someone else posted it a few pages back: https://www.accountingformanagement.org/dollar-value-lifo-method/
February 28, 2017 at 8:33 am #1500456February 28, 2017 at 8:34 am #1500457
GiniCParticipant@Iceman6 – at least your exam is behind you and you can (probably) take a break from studying. Still obsessing here, forgetting to take tax off my AOCI pension calculation…
February 28, 2017 at 8:46 am #1500463
mtaylo24Participant@McKan514w Thanks. Does anybody know where I can find a list of the Q1 rule changes?
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 28, 2017 at 9:15 am #1500477
mckan514wParticipantGetting back to small vs. large stock dividends- am I correct in the fact that Large stock dividends (greater than 25%) are recorded at Par… DR RE / CR Common
and that Small ones are recorded at FV- so DR RE- Mkt/ CR Common-Par CR APIC difference???If I pass this before having a nervous breakdown it will be a miracle..
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 9:27 am #1500483
GiniCParticipant@mckan514w – Yes, but I have been having issues with entries on date of declaration vs. date of distribution. Some of the materials display as though there's only one entry (like you just did) but I was taught two, for ALL dividends.
Date of declaration
DR Retained Earnings Par for Lg, FV for small
…..CR Stock Dividends DistributableRecord date – no entry
Date of distribution
DR Stock Dividends Distributable
…..CR CS at par
…..CR (for small dividends) excess of FV over parI questioned Becker on this yesterday, but haven't heard back yet.
February 28, 2017 at 9:27 am #1500486
HollyParticipantAccording to the FASB conceptual framework, which of the following situations violates the concept of reliability?
A. Data on segments having the same expected risks and growth rates are reported to analysts estimating future profits.
B. Financial statements are issued nine months late.
C. Management reports to stockholders regularly refer to new projects undertaken, but the financial statements never report project results.
Correct D. Financial statements include property with a carrying amount increased to management's estimate of market value.What would C be? I was thinking complete????
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16February 28, 2017 at 9:38 am #1500495
mckan514wParticipant@Ginic- I think you are correct on your entries- (I was just doing a “down and dirty” to make sure I had amounts correct)- the OWNER of the stocks would not record anything until date of record…. however the company records the liability on date of declaration.
@hr- yeah I think C would speak to completeness- management says it is doing this but the records do not show it so either management is lying or the records are not complete…
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 9:44 am #1500501
mckan514wParticipant@mtaylo- not sure about a list anywhere but off top of head we have:
Inventories- all other than LIFO and Retail Method LIFO are now Lower of Cost or NRV
DTL/DTA- all are now listed as Non-current
Prospective application of significant influence (gained or lost).Seems like there is another one but can't remember it right now….
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 10:32 am #1500531
T RevParticipant@GiniC Thank you for the link to the Dollar Value LIFO explanation. I knew the steps before, but this explains why those steps are done and that was exactly what I needed to help cement everything.
February 28, 2017 at 11:31 am #1500565
HollyParticipantDid y'all see someone posted about selling their 3/10 seat to test? It's since been closed to new replies, but crazy!
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16February 28, 2017 at 11:45 am #1500577
mckan514wParticipantLOL- I enjoyed that one with my morning coffee @hr…. ha ha ha ha…. especially was interested since they said it was a “Washington DC test center”- which is my area- SMH….
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 28, 2017 at 11:46 am #1500579
mtaylo24ParticipantThat's actually pretty clever
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 28, 2017 at 12:11 pm #1500594
T RevParticipantNo I wouldn't offer that idea any sort of compliment. There's a difference between capitalizing on an opportunity, and then there's just being a crappy human being. Some of us are using doing all of this to better our lives, as opposed to just living up to Daddy's expectations. The person selling it wouldn't be a CPA yet, but I would assume that this would qualify as an act disreputable to the profession.
February 28, 2017 at 12:14 pm #1500597
HollyParticipantI was shocked that person had the nerve to post it. Pretty sure Trevor is right.
BEC - 79
REG - 85
AUD - 5/27/16 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 113’ is closed to new replies.
