- This topic has 2,502 replies, 106 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
mckan514w.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:26 pm #1396517
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 26, 2017 at 5:13 pm #1499005
GiniCParticipantUnder equity method, you get a share of your investee's income (those $15,000 amounts for each quarter) but, because you “own” them the dividends they pay out are kind of like they paid out of your share of their equity (not their income). The T-account for the period they owned more than 20% looks like this:
______Salt______
$900,000|………(1/1/1 purchase)
15,000| 15,000 (Q1 DR Share of income; CR $1/share dividend)
15,000|………(Q2 DR Share of income)
……..|………JULY 1, SOLD 10,000 SHARES SO NOW OWN JUST 10%; no longer entitled to income share, but dividends are now revenue
……..| ?????? Sale price, so investment balance is lowerNow under cost method, Salt's income is irrelevant The only journal entry here will be
DR Cash……750
…CR Dividend Income…..750And at the end of the year, adjust to new fair value; use income if trading, OCI if AFS.
Does that help?
February 26, 2017 at 5:14 pm #1499008
mckan514wParticipant@mscfisher- the $1 dividend that was declared in March when Peppers still had “significant” influence would increase cash reduce the stocks carry amount- it wouldn't reduce the number of shares owned…. and the 1.50 dividend would be recognized as dividend income based on shares owned.
So year 1 when stock was purchased 30% for $60
DR Investment in Peppers 900,000
CR Cash 900,000Q1 and Q2 Income Recognition
DR Investment In Peppers 30,000
CR Investment Income 30,000Q1 Dividend of $1 share
Cash 15,000
Investment in Peppers 15,000Then you sold all but 500 shares so
DR Cash XXX
CR Investment In peppers 256,650 (29% of the stock because you are retaining 1% or 500 shares)
DR/CR Gain Loss Investment In Peppers XXXSo your Investment in Peppers would be your 500 shares based on carry amount at the time (or 8,850) if that makes sense….
Then Dividend of 1.50
DR Cash 750
CR Dividend Income 750and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2February 26, 2017 at 5:56 pm #1499037
mtaylo24ParticipantOK, I need a break from BEC and that stupid operating budget chapter lol. What's everybody studying today?
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 26, 2017 at 6:10 pm #1499055
GiniCParticipantI'm slogging through section 2 of Becker's final review. Some parts are great (I'm good at bonds!) and others terrifying (statements of cash flows). Cat can tell my stress is ramping up for the test, he's staying within 3 feet of me. Gotta love the pets through this!
February 26, 2017 at 6:11 pm #1499058
aatouralParticipant@Mtaylo – at least you didn't have to spend that Budget lecture listen to Angie Brown (Becker instructor). She was like a lullaby.
Marketable Securities and Consolidation.
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSFebruary 26, 2017 at 6:11 pm #1499059February 26, 2017 at 6:13 pm #1499062
aatouralParticipant@Ginic – I feel exactly the opposite as you. Tomorrow is going to be my review tackle/battle with bonds again. I hate them. Cash flows seem to be easier to me.
BEC - PASSED
AUD - 8/29/16
FAR - TBS
REG - TBSFebruary 26, 2017 at 6:17 pm #1499067
mtaylo24Participant@GiniC I hear you about the kitty! Wife and kid are getting annoyed that my ignore game is on 1000. FOCUSED!!!!
@aatoural I've heard horror stories about that lady!
@LCros Make sure you have some caffeine on deck for pensions. That one definitely put me to sleep last night!AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)February 26, 2017 at 6:20 pm #1499073
kman21ParticipantFebruary 26, 2017 at 6:21 pm #1499074
kman21ParticipantI am having trouble understanding the concept
February 26, 2017 at 7:11 pm #1499131
MscfisherParticipant@mckan514.. the journal entries really help. So this is my question. I understand the 30k and so if the dividend reduces the investment account it doesn't touch the net income? I thought dividends were paid from earnings….i think i will just get this question wrong one the exam. Or maybe by the time i do 1000 more questions it will click 🙁
February 26, 2017 at 7:39 pm #1499154
GiniCParticipant@aatoural – I'll go through cash flows again tomorrow, and you help when I get stuck – you ask me about bonds. We'll get each other through our worst sections!
February 26, 2017 at 7:46 pm #1499157
GiniCParticipantMaybe this will help –
Salt pays the dividends from its RETAINED EARNINGS – not its net income. Income is not the same as earnings. Pepper's increase in “Investment in Salt” is Pepper's share of net income for the quarter. When Salt pays dividends out of Retained Earnings (an equity account) Salt is reducing the value of it's equity section of the balance sheet(retained earnings) and its asset section (the cash it pays out) equally. This makes Salt overall worth less, which is why Pepper reduces its share of Salt by the dividend amount.
When you receive dividends, while using Equity method, your journal entry is
DR Cash___________15,000 (you still get the cash, but it's an asset on the balance sheet)
…..CR Investment in Salt______15,000 (you added to asset Cash, but took away from asset Salt; nothing touched an I/S account)When you receive dividends using the Cost method the journal entry is
DR Cash__________750 (asset on the balance sheet, just like in Equity)
……CR Dividend Income____750 (This is a revenue account, which DOES hit the income statement)February 26, 2017 at 7:54 pm #1499175
CruzerParticipantDid anyone else doing the NINJA MCQ's think the 17 Consolidation questions were straight ridic? Everyone one of them was computational.
February 26, 2017 at 8:52 pm #1499223
NamstutParticipantHey all! I hope everyone is having a very productive Sunday evening!
I am a little confused on this questions, specifically the goods, which were purchased and received in December, but not paid for until January. We are adding the amount back to the ending A/P balance because we did not record/pay the invoice until January. I understand that the original entry would be:
Dr: Goods
Cr: PayableWhen we pay:
Dr: Payable
Cr: CashThe question is HOW do you record the liability without having an invoice? A purchase order? I am in the industry where NO transaction will enter Payable unless there is an Invoice so I am just trying to understand the process. I got the answer wrong because I did not increase the YE payable balance for this item so I am frustrated that I stumbled on one of the easiest topics.
Question CPA-00617
Black Corp.'s accounts payable at December 31 Year 1, totaled $900,000 before any necessary year-end adjustments relating to the following transactions:
On December 27, Year 1, Black wrote and recorded checks to creditors totaling $400,000 causing an overdraft of $100,000 in Black's bank account at December 31, Year 1. The checks were mailed out on January 10, Year 2.
On December 28, Year 1, Black purchased and received goods for $153,061, terms 2/10, n/30. Black records purchases and accounts payable at net amounts. The invoice was recorded and paid January 3, Year 2.
Goods shipped F.O.B. destination on December 20, Year 1 from a vendor to Black were received January 2, Year 2. The invoice cost was $65,000.At December 31, Year 1, what amount should Black report as total accounts payable?
a. $1,153,061
b. $1,515,000
c. $1,450,000
d. $1,053,061Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. $1,450,000 accounts payable at 12/31/Year 1.
Accounts Payable Balance per books before y/e adjustments – 900,000
Add: Checks written on 12/27/Year 1 (which reduced A/P) but not mailed until 1/10/Year 2 – 400,000
Add: Goods received 12/28/Year 1 but not recorded until 1/3/Year 2 at amount net of 2% discount ($153,061 x 98%) – 150,000
No entry for goods shipped FOB destination on 12/20/Year 1 but not received until 1/2/Year 2Total accounts payable at 12/31/Year 1 1,450,000
AUD 7/6/16 Passed
BEC 9/3/16
FAR TBD
REG TBD -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 108’ is closed to new replies.
