- This topic has 835 replies, 150 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by
wjxhahaha.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 2, 2015 at 3:06 am #198720
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 25, 2016 at 1:01 am #746621
PleaseDontDeleteThanksParticipantYo Jeff, Ninja appears wrong on this question: “A donor gives $10,000 to a nongovernmental, not-for-profit organization with instructions that it must be used to fund the organization’s general operating expenses during the following fiscal year. The donation will increase the organization's:
A. unrestricted net assets.
Incorrect B. temporarily restricted net assets.
C. restricted net assets.
D. restricted retained earnings.You answered B. The correct answer is C.
Nongovernmental not-for-profit doesn't have a net asset designation of “restricted net assets”
Governmental foundations have restricted, but nongovernmental do not.
FAR 72, 89
BEC 80
REG 90
AUD 79February 25, 2016 at 3:57 am #746622
AnonymousInactiveughhh I am on my last couple of days of review exam is on 2/29. I am sure we all are on the same boat.. frustrated as hell @#$ i feel like i forget everything and my mind is so sick of this exam that my scores are just awful… end of rant.
February 25, 2016 at 4:00 am #746623
odela2428MemberMarqzho
Thank you..i graduated 15 yrs ago..and been out in acctg field for 8yrs..but will give it a try..thnks
February 25, 2016 at 7:30 pm #746624
cgartimeParticipant@PleaseDontDeleteThanks
For my understanding, Non Profit does have restricted asset. Also, the fund is not restricted for use, but it is time restricted to following year. Please let me know if I am wrong.February 26, 2016 at 5:47 pm #746625
Track55ParticipantHello. I don't get this question:
During the year, Bay Co. constructed machinery for its own use and for sale to customers. Bank loans financed these assets both during construction and after construction was complete. How much of the interest incurred should be reported as interest expense in the year-end income statement?
The explanation was: Once an asset is complete, and ready for use OR sale, then any interest incurred after that is an interest expense, not capitalized.
Well then if that's the case then both situations should have the same answer too. Instead MCQ gave this as the correct answer: Interest incurred for machinery for own use: interest incurred after completion; Interest incurred for machinery held for sale: all interest incurred.
That's not the same answer for both. Is the MCQ answer wrong? Thank you.
AUD - 74, 99 !!
REG - 74, 92
BEC - 83
FAR - 73, 86Studying for Ethics exam
California candidate
Business and IndustryFebruary 26, 2016 at 6:29 pm #746626
marqzhoParticipantHere is what Roger's book said:
Capitalize interest cost when:
1. For own use
2. Asset manufactured for resale resulting from a special order (Ships)Do NOT capitalize interest if:
1. After Completion
2. Inventory manufactured in the ordinary course of businessAnd Here what FASB said:
To qualify for interest capitalization, assets must require a period of time to get them ready for their intended use. Examples are assets that an enterprise constructs for its own use (such as facilities) and assets intended for sale or lease that are constructed as discrete projects (such as ships or real estate projects). Interest capitalization is required for those assets if its effect, compared with the effect of expensing interest, is material. If the net effect is not material, interest capitalization is not required. However, interest cannot be capitalized for inventories that are routinely manufactured or otherwise produced in large quantities on a repetitive basis.
So to your question:
interest expense incurred:
Own use <- After completion
Held for sale<- AllREG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84February 27, 2016 at 6:15 am #746627
Track55ParticipantHello. This is another questions that seems contradictory. If a donor donates a building to a non-profit and does not restrict it, it should be unrestricted assets. The explanation for question 1368 says that it would be temporarily restricted if the charity had an accounting policy that implies a time restriction on the useful life.
However the box says that only a donor can restrict, and that board of director decisions cannot restrict an asset.
So which is it? Can a charity have an accounting policy that temporarily restrict assets? Thanks for help!!
AUD - 74, 99 !!
REG - 74, 92
BEC - 83
FAR - 73, 86Studying for Ethics exam
California candidate
Business and IndustryFebruary 27, 2016 at 2:50 pm #746628
ktang4MemberThis is a random question, but I recently failed AUD and so I am applying for a NTS. This process takes forever so I was wondering if I have FAR scheduled for after busy season, can I pay for both AUD and FAR incase I don't pass the FAR exam (which is very likely from what I have heard)? I would rather just pay for FAR now so I don't have to wait for the NTS later when I inevitably fail.
February 27, 2016 at 7:16 pm #746629
marqzhoParticipantTrack55
My understanding is, only donor imposed or restricted by external party can be temporary unrestricted asset. Its own accounting policy is just like board designated or director decision all should be classified as unrestricted.
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84February 27, 2016 at 8:34 pm #746630
kelly017ParticipantCan someone explain this problem?
On March 1, Year 1, Somar Co. issued 20-year bonds at a discount. By September 1, Year 6, the bonds were quoted at 106 when Somar exercised its right to retire the bonds at 105. The amount is material and considered to be unusual in nature and infrequently occurring with respect to Somar Co. How should Somar report the bond retirement on its Year 6 income statement under U.S. GAAP?
a.
A gain in continuing operations.
b.
A loss in continuing operations.
c.
A gain in other comprehensive income.
d.
A loss in other comprehensive income.February 27, 2016 at 8:54 pm #746631
marqzhoParticipantkelly017
If Ans is B, then keep reading lol
When you retire the bond, here will be the JE
Dr. Bond 100
Dr. Loss (PLUG)
Cr. Discount Unknown
Cr. Cash 105Since Bond is carried at amortized cost instead of Fair Value, the quoted price is useless here
Hope that help !
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84February 27, 2016 at 9:00 pm #746632
chvzgrcaParticipantOn page 91 in FAR 2, why is the bonus $4,762 and not $5k. Case A. Appreciate help in advance Thank you.
February 27, 2016 at 9:14 pm #746633
marqzhoParticipantchvzgrca
would you mind put all the info up here instead?
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84February 27, 2016 at 10:29 pm #746634
chvzgrcaParticipantExample H & J partner agree to share all profits and losses
a. 5% bonus on income (after bonus) to H as managing partner (not applicable in net loss situations)Step 1:
Bonus to H
B= 5% ($100K B)
= $4,762February 28, 2016 at 3:22 am #746635
marqzhoParticipantB = ($100k – B) *5%
B = ($100k – B) / 20
20B = 100k – B
21B = 100k
B = 4762Bonus can't be 5000 because 5% * (100k – 5k) ï¼4750
REG 90
FAR 95
AUD 98
BEC 84 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.
