FAR Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 34

Viewing 15 replies - 496 through 510 (of 835 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #746426
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    I'm really not sure. I don't want to take it too soon, but if I don't schedule for Feb.29 (that is exactly 5 weeks from when I started studying) I will have to wait until April to be able to take it. I guess I'll give it my best shot. Failing isn't what worries me really, I wouldn't be the first to fail a section, I just really don't want to give these guys anymore money than I have to lol. Thanks for the info!

    #746427
    Fk
    Participant

    What does unrecognized firm commitment , recognized firm commitment and Forecasted transaction means

    #746428
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @pyacpa49, well I see your point and that's the reason why I took FAR at the end of November even when I thought I needed another week. I knew we did not have exams in December and then my last is this testing window. I wanted to give it a try and see where I was but then It made me mad that I was only a point away from being done! Go for it and you may get it on your first try!!!

    #746429
    Hank Scorpio
    Participant

    E & S Partnership purchased land for $500,000 on May 1, 20X1, paying $100,000 cash and giving a $400,000 note payable to Big State Bank. E & S made three annual payments on the note totaling $179,000, which included interest of $89,000. E & S then defaulted on the note. Title to the land was transferred by E & S to Big State, which canceled the note, releasing the partnership from further liability. At the time of the default, the fair value of the land approximated the note balance. In E & S's 20X4 income statement, what should the amount of the loss be?

    A.
    $279,000

    B.
    $221,000

    Correct C.
    $190,000

    D.
    $100,000

    Because the fair value of the land approximated the balance due on the note, neither the debtor (E & S) nor the creditor (Big State) records a gain or loss on the settlement of the debt.

    E & S, however, must record a gain or loss on the disposal of an asset (the land). Since the fair value of the land approximated the balance due on the note, the fair value must have declined from the purchase price (which is also the carrying value since land is not depreciable); therefore, the loss must be in the amount already paid on the purchase, or, $190,000 (the $100,000 payment and the $90,000 payments made on principal of the note (total payments – interest = $179,000 – $89,000 = $90,000)).

    So my question regarding this is, am I wrong in finding this answer using the JE for this transaction? I guess right by figuring the debit is to the liability for 310,000 (the original 400,000 less the principal payment of 90,000) and the credit is to the land asset for 500,000. The loss is the plug in the transaction. I've seen it explained different ways but never with the entry.

    FAR - 10/3/16
    BEC - 69 - 10/31/16
    AUD - November 2016
    REG - December 2016

    #746430
    marqzho
    Participant

    I don't see why JE would not be an option.

    Initial purchase:
    Dr. Land 500
    Cr. Cash 100
    Cr. NP 400

    payment:
    Dr. NP 90
    Dr. Interest 89
    Cr. Cash 179

    default
    Dr. NP 310
    Dr. Loss (Plug)190
    Cr. Land 500

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #746431
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ marqzho, did you take FAR already?

    #746432
    Hank Scorpio
    Participant

    Thank you @marqzho. That was my thought as well.

    FAR - 10/3/16
    BEC - 69 - 10/31/16
    AUD - November 2016
    REG - December 2016

    #746433
    marqzho
    Participant

    Aguspesci78

    Not yet. Feb 17.

    I am sososooooo lost now. I am gonna faillllllllll! 🙁

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #746434
    iamstrong
    Participant

    I'm taking FAR on Feb 29th. Working full time and studying is tough! I'm trying to stay on track doing two chapters a week per Becker but there is so much material- I have a hard time doing every single question
    ? Any body else feel the same? Do you just go through all the questions an then go back to review or do you review as you answer the questions?
    Thank you so much
    Rachel

    #746435
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    FASB ASC 360-10-15-4 requires testing for impairment loss for certain long-lived assets. Which of the following types of leases is tested for impairment?
    I.Capital leases of lessees
    II.Long-lived assets of lessors subject to operating leases
    A.
    I only

    B.
    II only

    C.
    Both I and II

    D.
    Neither I nor II

    #746436
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is it C?

    #746437
    Andyred04
    Participant

    I agree with you that it would be C. Capital Leases ARE recorded as assets on the lessee's books while operating leases remain on the lessor's books as an asset. I would THINK they would both be subject to impairment loss.

    FAR: 80 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    REG: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    BEC: 87 (Gleim, Ninja Notes, Ninja MCQs)
    AUD: 8/27/16

    PA Candidate

    #746438
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ Andyred04, C is correct and I had the same line of thought as you did!

    #746439
    Kate12345
    Participant

    Never posted anything before, I still new here. 😀

    First about the Artwork and Historical Treasures. In GR, they should be capitalized as historical cost or fair value at date of donation. But in SR, 3 conditions:
    a.Are held for public exhibition, education, or research in furtherance of public service rather than financial gain
    b.Are protected, kept unencumbered, cared for, and preserved
    c.Are subject to an organizational policy that requires the proceeds from sales of collection items to be used to acquire other items for collections.

    1)How should we record those under SR assets? We should not capitalize them. So The J/E is???

    Dr Cost?
    Cr ???

    Or we only require to disclosure collections?

    2) in GR, those artwork are capitalized in FV or Historical Cost, SO HOW to deal with them in the end of year? record as unrealizable gain/ loss ? and like the AFS when SELL just

    Dr cash
    Dr unrealizable Gain
    Cr Unrealizable Loss
    Cr assets

    3)the employer net pension liability for the Golf City Fire Department decreased by $200,000 from Y1 to Y2 as a result of a change in actuarial assumptions used to value the employer net pension liability. As result of this change, Golf City will display the following on their Y2 gov-wide financial statements:

    B Deferred inflows of resources of $200,000

    pension is an obligation/Liability. when it is reduced, we need to PAY money. so why it is deferred inflows here?

    Thank you !

    FAR - 02/25/2016 - 75
    REG - 04/21/2016 -
    AUD - 06/10/2016 -
    BEC - 07/10/2016 -

    HOPE THIS SCHEDULE WORK, (Reschedule Far Once)

    #746440
    zkk
    Member

    Question:

    May anyone tell me the difference among: unearned revenue, deferred inflow, and revenue collect in advance????

    Studying Governmental acctg (F8) these days, feel confused about the point.

    Thank you!!!

    Julia.C

Viewing 15 replies - 496 through 510 (of 835 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 34’ is closed to new replies.