FAR Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 31

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 835 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #746381
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Hopeocean – Thanks for your reply and you right! I completely forgot about the two diff types of accounts for APIC (i.e. APIC – TS and APIC- CS)

    #746382
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @JSM – I'm you feel good about your exam! I'm sure you did great! You are giving me hope but fears at the same time!!

    J/E are my weak point! I think in the last exam (missed by 6 points), it felt like those SIMS were super long and you had to decipher every sentence… Was that the same case for you?

    Also, not sure how much comfortable you or anyone here feels about J/Es, but what is your advice on reviewing those? Like I'm using Becker and Ninja MCQ – wondering what chapters you think its best to focus on to really get your money's worth w/r/t J/Es??

    I'm taking FARE next Monday – Trying to do lecture for F10 today so that I can do an intense review of all major points to prep for Monday. I know J/Es in the SIMS will be key for me!

    Thanks in advance!!

    #746383
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @JSM Good to see you're still kickin lol. Hoping for you pass! I take FAR Thursday and am freaking out just a little (a lot). This makes me feel a little better. Good luck!

    #746384
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @hitmi, doesn't look like anyone answered your question above regarding the intercompany transaction. The GP in the question is more or less implied. The question shows that Lamm ships to Banks inventory worth 150,000 but Banks records it at 200,000. This is a 50,000 markup that Lamm would otherwise show, but because they are related parties they cannot. We need to take this amount out of the ending inventory Banks has from Lamm in order to get the true cost of the inventory, less the markup. To do this: 150,000/200,000 = .75. Then multiply that by Banks' ending inventory from Lamm (60,000 * .75 = 45,000). This 45,000 is the amount of the inventory less any markup, which eliminates the amount of the GP that would have otherwise been recognized when this inventory was eventually sold. 45,000 +175,000 + 250,000 = 470,000.

    #746385

    @excel monkey, U DA MAN! Thank you so much

    Any other advice you have for a first time test taker? I want that 90! I am half way through my second take on gleim study units with 6 weeks to go and the week off from work before exam.

    #746386
    qfolmar
    Participant

    Praying for a passing score for you, @JSM, and everyone who will be taking this beast of an exam. I take my retest on Thursday as well, @pyacpa49.

    FAR-79
    REG-82
    AUD-83
    BEC- August 31st

    #746387
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @qfolmar, hopefully it'll be kind to us that day, good luck! I'm freaking out more than I was because I broke my foot a week ago so my life has been nothing but work and doctors visits. definitely not what I wanted to deal with the week before my exam..

    #746388
    MaLoTu
    Participant

    @JSM – That sounds SO similar to the exam I had. Some of my sims were even super short. I hope that we both pass, but I definitely relate to your sentiment that it is hard to feel very optimistic!

    #746389
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @JSM, I am glad to hear about your exam and it is good that you feel optimistic about it. I hope I can have the same feeling 2 weeks from tomorrow!!! I am almost finish to Chapter 8 and will hit 9-1o this week and will start the review again on weak areas. I am planning on hitting the SIMS hard this week and next week and look at all the J/E for the chapters and get very familiar with it!!!
    REG: 77
    BEC:73/74/81
    AUD:58/76
    FAR:74/ Retake Feb 2nd!

    #746390
    bigbuk
    Member

    how similar would people who recently took the test say that ninja mcq compares to the actual test in terms of depth of what they are asking? Anyone see the same exact questions asked?

    #746391
    wombataholic
    Participant

    I would say that Ninja is similar in terms of question depth.

    Ninja definitely has more “tough” questions – the ones where you're either given way too much information, slightly tweaked wordings that completely change what the question is asking, and questions that you need to reverse engineer an entry to come up with the answer.

    As for identical questions – I don't remember any word-for-word same questions on any of my exams. There were some similar questions though.

    Licensed CPA
    Passed each section on the first try with Ninja Notes/MCQ/Audio

    #746392
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Securities of a subsidiary that are convertible into parent company's stock shall be considered:

    Select an answer:

    A.
    potential common shares of the parent for consolidated diluted EPS.

    B.
    potential common shares of the parent to the extent that they are converted.

    C.
    potential common shares of the parent to the extent that they are likely to be converted.

    D.
    not parent company shares for purposes of diluted EPS.

    #746393
    bigbuk
    Member

    c?

    #746394
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @Aguspesci78 @bigbuk, I was thinking A..

    #746395
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It is A but could not find this in the book

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 835 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 31’ is closed to new replies.