FAR Study Group October November 2017 - Page 55

  • This topic has 970 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 15 replies - 811 through 825 (of 970 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1666021
    Wannafree
    Participant

    IwannaB ,it's B. Question ask for “must not be recognized.
    Loss of plant or inventories as a result of fire or natural disaster that occurred after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
    This need disclosure not AJE.
    D ,A and C are good candidate for AJE as condition existed before BS date and event happened before issue date.I guess you overlooked “must not”.

    #1666106
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone help me understand when I should include the uncollectable accounts as part of “revenue” in Governmental? In one question:
    The following information pertains to property taxes levied by Oak City for the calendar year Year 1:

    Collections during Year 1 $ 500,000
    Expected collections during the first 60 days of Year 2 100,000
    Expected collections during the balance of Year 2 60,000
    Expected collections during January Year 3 30,000
    Estimated to be uncollectible 10,000
    Total levy $ 700,000

    What amount should Oak report for Year 1 net property tax revenues in its fund financial statements?

    a.$500,000
    b.$700,000
    c.$600,000
    d.$690,000

    Explanation

    Choice “c” is correct. The net property tax revenues would include the $500,000 collections during the year plus the $100,000 expected collections within 60 days of year-end, for a total of $600,000. The remaining expected collections of $90,000 ($60,000 + $30,000) would be recorded as deferred inflows of resources, not revenues, under the modified accrual basis of governmental accounting for revenues. The $10,000 estimated to be uncollectible would not be considered since revenues are accounted for net of the estimated uncollectible amount.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. The revenues account would include neither the $90,000 expected collections beyond 60 days after year-end nor the $10,000 uncollectible amount.

    Choice “d” is incorrect. The revenues account would not include the $90,000 expected collections beyond 60 days after year-end.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. The revenues account would include the $100,000 expected collections shortly after year-end (within 60 days).


    But then in the same Module, there is this question:

    The City of Ocean Oaks estimates that five percent of its property tax revenues are uncollectible. The city typically levies and collects all taxes within the tax year that the tax revenue is intended to benefit. For the fiscal year ended June 30, Year 1, Ocean Oaks levied $2,000,000 in taxes and would record the following amounts as revenue and receivable:

    Receivable Revenue
    a.$2,000,000 $1,900,000
    b.$2,000,000 $2,000,000
    c.$1,900,000 $2,000,000
    d.$1,900,000 $1,900,000

    Explanation
    Choice “a” is correct. Imposed tax revenues are recorded (accrued) as revenue when levied, subject to the measurable and available criteria. The property tax levy would be recorded as follows:
    To record tax revenue from tax levy:
    DR Property tax receivable $ 2,000,000
    CR Estimated uncollectible taxes $ 100,000
    CR Property tax revenue 1,900,000

    #1666175
    Sturg
    Participant

    Same boat @ReckedRacing. I've been dreaming about that cash flows SIM I wish I could have back. Feeling worse and worse about score release as time goes on. Moving on to REG but can't get into it until I know FAR is slain.

    #1666268
    Wannafree
    Participant

    @Sturg ,are you taking REG in Q4 ?

    #1666271
    Anonymous
    Participant

    So, the following MCQ tripped me up. I agree with the explanation provided by NINJA except for the part where we aren't recogniing the $1000 of cash RECEIVED. Per the NINJA notes “the only gain that can be recognized is any boot (cash) received from the transaction”. Help please. See below.

    During 20X1, Beam Co. paid $1,000 cash and traded inventory, which had a carrying amount of $20,000 and a fair value of $21,000, for other inventory in the same line of business with a fair value of $22,000. The exchange of the inventory is to facilitate sales to Beam's customers. What amount of gain (loss) should Beam record related to the inventory exchange?

    A.
    $2,000

    Incorrect B.
    $1,000

    C.
    $0

    D.
    $(1,000)

    I chose B.

    I'm tired of operating in fear and mediocrity. It's time to try. It's time to do. It's time to go.

    #1666438
    IwannabeaCPA2017
    Participant

    Douglas Co. leased machinery with an economic useful life of six years. For tax purposes, the depreciable life is seven years. The lease is for five years, and Douglas can purchase the machinery at fair market value at the end of the lease. What is the depreciable life of the leased machinery for financial reporting?

    A.
    Zero

    B.
    Five years

    Incorrect C.
    Six years

    D.
    Seven years

    Is that not a Bargain option? I thought it was a bargan hence the useful life (6 years)

    #1666444
    IwannabeaCPA2017
    Participant

    @bOrn, because cash was paid no gain is recognized. There is no loss as well because CV is not greater than FV

    #1666541
    My Cousin Vinny
    Participant

    Can someone help me out with this one please?

    Tulip Co. owns 100% of Daisy Co.'s outstanding common stock. Tulip's cost of goods sold for the year totals $600,000 and Daisy's cost of goods sold totals $400,000. During the year, Tulip sold inventory costing $60,000 to Daisy for $100,000. By the end of the year, all transferred inventory was sold to third parties. What amount should be reported as cost of goods sold in the consolidated statement of income?

    A. $900,000

    B.$940,000

    C. $960,000

    D.
    $1,000,000

    Since Daisy sold all of the inventory purchased from Tulip, Daisy would have recognized $100,000 in cost of goods sold (COGS). As Daisy is a 100%-owned subsidiary, 100% of the COGS from Tulip is eliminated (i.e., intercompany profits and losses). Total COGS on the consolidated statement of income is $900,000 ($600,000 + $400,000 − $100,000).

    The correct answer is A. But I thought we just had to eliminate inter-company profits as Becker explains, which in this case would be $40,000? Why is the total $100,000 of sales being eliminated? Thank you in advance!

    #1666547
    Recked
    Participant

    The original 60k in COGS is recorded on the parents books already.

    Backing out the profit portion is usually used when some of the inventory sold to the SUB is still on hand at year end.

    COGS
    parent to sub
    60k

    Sub to 3rd party
    100k

    total cogs on combined statements = 160k, when in reality the combined parent/sub only paid 60k for those specific goods.

    #1666562

    Test Your Might: FAR – NINJA MCQ

    Post your answer in the Facebook thread for a chance to win a NINJA Sniper Package of your choice (Book, Notes, Audio, Videos, MCQ/SIMS, Audio, & Flashcards – $197 Value).

    One winner will be randomly chosen on Friday(ish). HIYA!

    #1666568
    My Cousin Vinny
    Participant

    @reckedracing very tricky, thank you so much. So if 100% is sold, back out from COGS the amount the sub paid to the parent? What would inter-company profit be though in this example? Still $40,000 right?

    #1666636
    Sturg
    Participant

    Hi @Wannafree, no I'm scheduled for Q1. Going to give myself plenty of time with the holidays and all..And REG is not my strong suit. What's up next for you?

    #1666714
    IwannabeaCPA2017
    Participant

    Hey guys, so this question is really confusing me..
    Orleans Co., a cash-basis taxpayer, prepares accrual-basis financial statements. In its current-year bal­ance sheet, Orleans’ deferred income tax liabilities increased compared to the previous year. Which of the following changes would cause this increase in deferred income tax liabilities?
    I.An increase in prepaid insurance
    II.An increase in rent receivable
    III.An increase in warranty obligations

    So I get why Prepaid is DTL because we have more deductions this year making our income lower this year and in future we will pay more. But isn't increase warranty the same. Essentially we have more expenses now and pay less taxes. But in the explanation it says Warranty is DTA.

    #1666951
    Wannafree
    Participant

    @Sturg ,FAR is my last section and I stuck since January this year. SIMs is like 800lbs Gorilla in room.My biggest problem so far was the time. I couldn't complete the last testlet ( 3 SIMs untouched).
    This time due to Blueprint discovery little optimistic.It was so painful to see that I knew the topic of SIM very well but had just 6-7 minutes left ,filled zeros .at least 2 SIMs I knew cold but needed 25 minutes at least.So this time I am practicing simple topic and finding long questions from some book or Ninja etc and try to solve as fast as I can.Today I am trying to solve some FS like IS BS Cash flows from Becker's.I start the topic and ask myself what could be tricky in this topic and try to find out ,weird but yes that's the way I am practicing this time.Today I am solving problems of chapter 8 of Becker's ,Cash flow ,Hedge and NFP.I have solved it 2 times but today trying to find out the tricky things like Bank over draft as per IFRS etc.I am good in converting cash to accrual or classification of items. Can you suggest some tricky items of cash flow ,BS or NFP ? If I don't find tricky enough then I look for IFRS treatment of the topics.LOL. I have gone crazy this time.

    #1666952
    IwannabeaCPA2017
    Participant

    @wannafree, thanks man I totally just saw your response now! and dude I'm on the same boat. been on FAR since Jan too

Viewing 15 replies - 811 through 825 (of 970 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2017 - Page 55’ is closed to new replies.