FAR Study Group October November 2017 - Page 45

  • This topic has 970 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 970 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1658417
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Ana – I appreciate your note, but I am completely lost. I don't even know which charts you are referring to (F6-43??) and honestly, don't even really know the stuff you are saying. I just can't seme to grasp this stuff and feel like I am going to need an eternity to understand it.

    #1658422
    Ana
    Participant

    @cpa3rd ok no prob. start from scratch. do you know the PUFER acronym from Becker? in regards to derivatives and hedging, only Effective Cash Flow Hedge goes to OCI. That's the E from PUFER. So by default everything else goes to the income statement. On the income statement it'll be either realized or unrealized. Good so far? and yes F6-43 chart is great.

    #1658590
    Jen-J
    Participant

    Updated on the FAR thread. A huge thank you for the suggestions to request scratch paper and to use the authoritative literature. Glad FAR is over after 3 months of studying! On to Audit, maybe I'll see a few of you over there.

    #1658596
    Ana
    Participant

    Thanks for updating, good luck Jen. Use the AL on Audit too!
    Did you follow the blueprint?

    #1658620
    Jen-J
    Participant

    Ana – no, I didn't. I think I skimmed it, but by the time it was available I was nearly done studying.

    #1658705
    Sturg
    Participant

    Can anyone explain why this is the correct answer. Govt accounting makes no sense at all…

    The Dunstown County general fund received a notice of a federal grant award for an expenditure-driven (reimbursement) grant in the amount of $1,000,000. Included with the notice was an advance of $250,000. During the year, the County incurred $400,000 of qualifying eligible grant expenditures, and no additional money had been received from the grantor.

    What would be the amount of intergovernmental receivables reported by the general fund at the close of the fiscal year?
    A.
    $0
    B.
    $150,000
    C.
    $600,000
    D.
    $750,000

    Answer: The receivable would equal the difference between the amount of the advance and the revenues of $400,000 (the amount spent on qualifying expenditures).

    Revenues $400,000
    Less advance received (250,000)
    ———
    Intergovernmental receivable $150,000
    =========

    Huh???

    #1658707
    Jen-J
    Participant

    Sturg – they've only earned 400K of the grant, and they've received 250K so far. The receivable is the difference.

    #1658761
    Recked
    Participant

    I believe its only revenue/receivable when the conditions of the grant are met.
    It is a reimbursement grant, so it would be counted as revenue/receivable when spent on the qualifying reimbursable expenditures.
    They spent 400k which will all be reimbursed, but to date have only received 250k of the 400k.

    I THINK if it were just a general purpose grant with no restrictions then the full 1mil would all be booked when granted, regardless of when received.

    Notes from my book.
    Revenues accrued for:Property taxes (+60 days)
    Grants – unrestricted -approved
    Restricted(When spent)
    Hope this makes sense. I also had some trouble with Gov't, so I started the chapter over from the beginning, the second time through helped it stick in my head. Good luck.

    #1658768
    Anonymous
    Participant

    PLEASE BREAK DOWN (IN LAYMENS TERMS) WHAT THIS QUESTION IS ASKING?

    Clark Co. had the following transactions with affiliated parties during 20X1:

    Sales of $60,000 to Dean, Inc., with $20,000 gross profit. Dean had $15,000 of this inventory on hand at year-end. Clark owns a 15% interest in Dean and does not exert significant influence.
    Purchases of raw materials totaling $240,000 from Kent Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary. Kent's gross profit on the sale was $48,000. Clark had $60,000 of this inventory remaining on December 31, 20X1.
    Before eliminating entries, Clark had consolidated current assets of $320,000. What amount should Clark report in its December 31, 20X1, consolidated balance sheet for current assets?

    Consolidated current assets before eliminations $320,000
    Less intercompany profit on remaining inventory
    purchased from Kent (Note 1) 12,000
    ——–
    Adjusted consolidated current assets $308,000
    ========
    Note 1: Computation of intercompany profit:
    Gross profit rate = $48,000 / $240,000 = 20%
    Gross profit in inventory = 20% x $60,000 = $12,000
    Note also that since Clark owns less than 20% of Dean, Inc., and does not exert significant influence, the gross profit from the sale to Dean does not require elimination.

    I'm tired of operating in fear and mediocrity. It's time to try. It's time to do. It's time to go.

    #1658789
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    @born to win

    The question is asking about the amount of current assets to be shown on the consolidated financial statements of Clark company who owns all of Kent but only 15% of Dean.

    Clark has intercompany sales with its subsidiaries. The problem gives you the consolidated current assets before elimination entries. So, all you need to do is eliminate any intercompany profit between Clark and Kent and subtract it from that number.

    If the question is why? It is my understanding that elimination entries don't come into play unless the parent company owns more than 50%.

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1658827
    Anonymous
    Participant

    @Lentilcounter Thank you so much! That explanation is what I needed.

    I'm tired of operating in fear and mediocrity. It's time to try. It's time to do. It's time to go.

    #1658870
    Sturg
    Participant

    Thank you ReckedRacing, that makes sense. There was never anything in my study material about reimbursement grants so it was totally foreign to me. So its a revenue when money is spent…?

    #1658879
    Recked
    Participant

    Careful with your wording.
    It's a revenue when the restriction on the grant is met. The restriction on this grant is that it be spent on qualifying things.
    There could be other restrictions, such as time, or the money could have been spent, but not on qualifying things.

    #1658893
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Ana thanks for your response. I decided to take yesterday off to enjoy some football, so I am just seeing your response. I think that's helpful. I do understand the PUFER mnemonic from becker, I guess I didn't completely realize how it was tied into the section 6 in Becker. Thanks for the help, I will try to work through some of this stuff!

    #1658932
    CoastalJuan
    Participant

    Just scheduled FAR for 12/4/17. Used to use Gleim, but they are getting expensive. Debating over Scout or Sniper. Anyone have any preferences? Is the audio, book, and Bisk worth it?

Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 970 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group October November 2017 - Page 45’ is closed to new replies.