- This topic has 1,059 replies, 174 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by
mtaylo24.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 31, 2017 at 6:56 am #1562995
jeffKeymasterWelcome to the Q3 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for FAR. 🙂
Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your FAR exam.
The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/
-
AuthorReplies
-
August 4, 2017 at 3:36 pm #1594955
AnthonyParticipant@FAR_SUCKS I have come across on some sims, but not all sims on the real exam can be vague as hell. Makes you wonder what are you trying to ask me?
August 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm #1594971
hopingtogetFARParticipant@vinti It took me a minute to think about that question, but I believe that it is answer B because the 8,000 would be reflected on the Statement of Activities and the question ask about the statement of fiancial position.
@Far_sucks Yes, I've had that issue on both mock exams I've taken. I take my exam tomorrow, so I will let you know if I had a similar problem with understanding.August 4, 2017 at 4:01 pm #1594974
hopingtogetFARParticipant@determinedCPAer Your answer to @vinti makes more sense than the answer I tried to give.
August 4, 2017 at 4:55 pm #1595009
VintiParticipant@determinedCPAer ohh I see, the word “designated” is confusing me. Thanks for explaining well.
@hopingtogetFAR thanks you too for replying.August 4, 2017 at 5:37 pm #1595024
hopingtogetFARParticipantAugust 4, 2017 at 6:00 pm #1595033
QueenCPAParticipantRelax, pray, have a good night rest and do something fun – will ease the nerve.
IMO, at this point, not so much difference can be made.
August 4, 2017 at 6:11 pm #1595043
DeterminedCPAerParticipantAugust 4, 2017 at 6:24 pm #1595058
setmefreeParticipantcan someone help me with this question, not sure why he sold the half of the bond still include the 15,000 dividend in the 30%
Lee, Inc. acquired 30% of Polk Corp.'s voting stock on January 1, 2004 for $100,000. During 2004, Polk earned $40,000 and paid dividends of $25,000. Lee's 30% interest in Polk gives Lee the ability to exercise significant influence over Polk's operating and financial policies.
During 2005, Polk earned $50,000 and paid dividends of $15,000 on April 1 and $15,000 on October 1. On July 1, 2005, Lee sold half of its stock in Polk for $66,000 cash.
What should the gain on sale of this investment in Lee's 2005 Income Statement be?
$16,000
$13,750
$12,250
YouAnsweredIncorrectly.
The $13,750 answer considers only the earnings and dividends for 2004, the first year of the investment. The carrying value for this answer is: $100,000 + .30($40,000-$25,000) = $104,500. One half that amount yields $52,250. The resulting gain would be $66,000- $52,250 = $13,750.
The correct answer is $12,250, which considers the earnings and dividends for both years. The carrying value of the entire investment at the date of sale equals:
$100,000 + .30[$40,000-$25,000 + .5($50,000)-$15,000] = $107,500. The gain, therefore, equals: $66,000-.5($107,500) = $12,250August 4, 2017 at 6:56 pm #1595069
RadezParticipantI think ASC 323-10-35-36 addresses this point. Basically, if your ownership of your equity method investment decreases to the extent that you no longer have significant influence you stop applying the equity method prospectively, but you won't adjust the carrying amount for activity up until that point. Therefore you would still consider the April 1 dividend of 15k when calculating the carrying value at the time of the disposal.
August 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm #1595076
DeterminedCPAerParticipant@setmefree I agree with @radez, you own 30% and significant influence up until June 30, 2005. You own 30% of the 15K dividend on April 1 and the $25K in earnings (50K during the year, assume earned evenly and divide by 2 to get first six months).
Looking forward, if the question asked what would be reported on Dec 31, 2005, your balance sheet would have investment in Polk account of 53,750. You would own only 15%. The dividend on October 1 would be 2,250 and it would appear on income statement as dividend income. You would not book any earnings for the remaining $25K in the second half.
August 4, 2017 at 8:38 pm #1595100
setmefreeParticipant@radez @DeterminedCPAer, thank you so much, it clears out my confusion
August 4, 2017 at 9:21 pm #1595123
nolan1868ParticipantFirst attempt at the beast tomorrow, and haven't taken any of the other exams before. Does anyone have any good pacing strategies? I'm worried about moving too slow through the exam and not being able to finish.
August 4, 2017 at 9:37 pm #1595130
WannafreeParticipant@nolan1868 , based on my previous attempt,this is what I do to .
1.Will read the question and try to finish it in 1.30 minutes (max ) if not move on to next question.If I would finish the 33 questions and still under 45 minutes than I will try to finish those questions which I missed earlier.Again I will try all those can be finished in 50 minutes.I would submit the testlet.If did good than I would get tougher questions in testlet 2 ,again same strategies but will allocate 10 minutes more.
If testlet 3 has any question which I can see is a big trap ( too long like prepare consolidated FS or Govt wide recon or any items with IFRS and US GAP both transaction with 1 millions emails I will just say talk to you latter and move on.So after skipping 1 testlet if I can solve 7 SIMs ,I would still feel comfortable to pass.August 4, 2017 at 9:54 pm #1595135
falvioParticipantDoes anyone have an easy way to think of consolidation of interco sales and such?
August 5, 2017 at 9:48 am #1595234
setmefreeParticipantPLEASE HELP!!! taking my first exam on monday but still extremely confused about how to determine is annuity in advance or ordinary annuity. In the question, it said lease a mechine on Dec 30, and the annual rental payable on Dec 30, wouldnt that be annuity in advance. Im not sure what im missing
On December 30 of the current year, Haber Co. leased a new machine from Gregg Corp. The following data relate to the lease transaction at the inception of the lease:
Lease term 10 years
Annual rental payable at the end of each lease year $100,000
Estimated life of machine 12 years
Implicit interest rate 10%
Present value of an annuity of $1 in advance for
10 periods at 10% 6.76
Present value of an annuity of $1 in arrears for
10 periods at 10% 6.15
Fair value of the machine $700,000The lease has no renewal option, and the possession of the machine reverts to Gregg when the lease terminates. At the inception of the lease, Haber should record a lease liability of:
A.
$0B.
$615,000C.
$630,000Incorrect D.
$676,000You answered D. The correct answer is B.
This lease qualifies as a capital lease because the lease term of 10 years exceeds 75% of the asset’s useful life of 12 years (10 > 0.75 × 12 = 9). When a lease is considered a capital lease, then the lessee capitalizes the lease property and recognizes a lease obligation for the present value of the minimum lease payments.
The minimum lease payments here are the $100,000 a year at the end of each year, and their present value is 100,000 × 6.15 (present value of an annuity in arrears or ordinary annuity, for 10 periods at 10%). Thus, the answer is $615,000:
100,000 × 6.15 = $615,000
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2017 - Page 53’ is closed to new replies.
