FAR Study Group July August 2017 - Page 45

Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 1,059 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1592039
    QueenCPA
    Participant

    @benjamin17 That is right. That is an example of restriction for a purpose. Once the land is purchased, they become unrestricted.

    #1592169
    DeterminedCPAer
    Participant

    @tonysoprano when is your exam and have you done any MCQs? The back half of chapter 8 is NFP. All of 9 and 10 is government and completely different. If you have time, it wouldnt hurt to review GAAP accounting before heading over to NFP and Gov, especially if you haven't done any MCQs while you were reviewing each chapter.

    I dont know about you but when I started my review, I forgot a lot of the details I learned from the earlier chapters.

    #1592171
    DeterminedCPAer
    Participant

    @vinti, sorry you probably already said this but when's your exam? If you haven't done any MCQs, i would really start MCQs before moving to NFP or Gov.

    #1592189
    Vinti
    Participant

    @DeterminedCPAer I am scheduled for Aug 31. I have started F3 MCQs. Thanks for replying. I am thinking to do both NFP/Govt in parallel to MCQs and review. But again MCQs and review is taking time. Let see how it goes, otherwise I will change my study plan again.

    #1592202
    DeterminedCPAer
    Participant

    Hey everyone, still on my review. Almost a day and half behind again as i wanted to start doing various MCQs from all chapters in my progress tests. Anyway, chapter 10 in Becker has 7 modules. The first two are for Proprietary (SE) and Fiduciary (PAPI). Module 3 is form and concept of comprehensive annual financial reporting.

    Module 4 starts governmental wide financial statements. I've already read it once and done MCQs. I'm wondering if i should just skip it and hedge they wouldn't ask questions in that area. Gearty even said he thinks its unlikely they would ask a question on government wide reconciliation because it is complex and every detailed.

    #1592205
    Vinti
    Participant

    Quick Question for all

    Why in this solution they took only $100000 for calculation of discount, why not total amount collectible.
    Question CPA-00058
    Delta, Inc. sells to wholesalers on terms of 2/15, net 30. Delta has no cash sales but 50% of Delta's
    customers take advantage of the discount. Delta uses the gross method of recording sales and trade
    receivables. An analysis of Delta's trade receivables balances at December 31 revealed the following:
    Age Amount Collectible
    0-15days $100,000 100%
    16-30days 60,000 95%
    31-60days 5,000 90%
    Over 60 days 2,500 $500
    $167,500
    In its December 31 balance sheet, what amount should Delta report for allowance for discounts?
    A. $1,000
    B. $1,620
    C. $1,675
    D. $2,000
    Explanation
    Choice “A” is correct, $1,000 allowance for discounts at 12/31.
    Accounts receivable (015
    days) 100,000
    50% of customers take 2% discount x 1%
    Allowance for discounts at 12/31 1,000.

    #1592207
    Vinti
    Participant

    I have problem in becker question number 58, why in solution they included only $100000 for calculating discount, why not total collectible amounts. I am trying to paste that question but it says duplicate entry, so couldn't paste. Becker students please help.

    #1592219
    QueenCPA
    Participant

    @DeterminedCPAer What day is your exam?

    @Vinti What day is your exam?

    #1592228
    DeterminedCPAer
    Participant

    @queencpa, its on August 7th. Whens yours? I'm sure you mentioned it but I forgot.

    #1592238
    Accountingbeans
    Participant

    Can anyone explain to me the concept of amortization when it comes to pensions, and why sometimes you debit OCI and sometimes you credit it? I can't keep straight which transactions would results in a debit to OCI vs a credit to OCI

    Newbie
    BEC- August 31

    #1592247
    DeterminedCPAer
    Participant

    Hey @Accountingbeans, I hope this helps and I hope I didnt confuse you more.

    The AGE in SIRAGE is always booked to OCI with the offsetting entry to plan assets or PBO (usually PBO since most companies always have obligations). Think of OCI is your purse or wallet, you put things in there and take it out as you need it.

    A is the unamortized of prior service service period adjustments. This is an expense is the initial entry is DR OCI and CR FV of assets or PBO.

    G is the unamortized gains/losses from changes in actuarial estimates (and the difference between expected return vs actual return on your plan assets when you use expected return in calculating ending FV of plan assets). If it's a gain, you DR FV of assets or PBO and credit OCI. If loss, you DR OCI and CR FV of assets or PBO.

    E is the unamortized of Existing net obligation or net assets. This is an expense so the unamortized amount is DR OCI and CR FV of plan assets or PBO.

    Now when you calculate the periodic pension plan expense (SIRAGE) the SIR is immediately expensed to the P&L. The AGE is amortized based on rules the book gives. The amortization is done for each A, G, and E. Now the unamortized amounts are sitting in OCI so you need to pull out the periodic amortization so you can expense on the P&L. (The gain will offset expense).

    For A (original DR OCI CR PBO), the periodic amortization now DR P&L, CR OCI.
    For G (original DR PBO CR OCI), the periodic amortization is now a DR OCI, CR P&L.
    For E (original DR OCI CR PBO), the period amortization is now DR P&L, CR OCI.

    You're basically reversing the original entry for the periodic amortization amount.

    At the end of every period, OCI is always cleared out to AOCI. For example, when you book your initial unamortized A G or E in year 1, it is cleared to AOCI at the end of year 1.

    Now when we are in year 5 and amortizing this stuff, the initial unamort is already sitting in AOCI. However, you book the reversing of the original entry for the periodic amortization amount. This will also get cleared out to AOCI. When you net the initial unamortization with the reversing amortization amount, AOCI will decrease (or increase if you have a bunch of gains) until it's fully amortized on the P&L.

    #1592249
    michelATL
    Participant

    Good afternoon guys,
    FAR SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 1ST, DEBATING WHETHER TO RESCHEDULE FOR THE 8TH???
    I recently joined and posted a few days ago regarding taking FAR on August 1st, which is currently about 42 hours from now. I'm seriously considering rescheduling for August 8th and don't have anyone to persuade me not to.
    Up until 2 weeks ago, I had been working about 25 hours per week, taking two MTax classes, and studying with Becker very thoroughly (I finished all of the lectures, MCQ, Skills Practice, and took good notes up until F5.)
    I took a mock exam 2 weeks ago and scored a 58 without finishing 2 of the SIMS and was planning to study non stop until the exam, but haven't due to a couple of unexpected work obligations the 1st week, taking the finals for my master's program this past Wednesday, and deciding to buy a house on Thursday (very spur of the moment because it's a great deal but has been a VERY TIME-CONSUMING process.)
    This weekend I have spent every spare moment just reading over the last 2 sections of Becker and feel that if I had an additional week to focus I could pass, but I feel guilty rescheduling considering that I was originally scheduled for July 7th. So in conclusion, I apologize for the short novel I just wrote but for anyone that read it and wouldn't mind encouraging or discouraging me from rescheduling based on personal and professional experiences I would really appreciate it. I'm going to decide my 9pm tonight…

    Thank you guys so much,
    Michel

    (Additional info: I'm 23, graduated undergrad with a BA in accounting, started MTax program in January, and currently work in the family car business as an assistant manager/buyer, and bookkeeper.)

    #1592258
    Accountingbeans
    Participant

    @determinedcpaer Thanks for your reply! TBH I'm a little fried from studying all day, so I'm gonna re-read and process your post sometime tomorrow but reading once thru did indeed help me to understand a bit better. Tomorrow I'll work to really understand it.



    @michelATL
    Based on what you're saying, your options are either to 1) Rush and take it at the scheduled date or 2) Give yourself an extra week to prepare. For option 2, it sounds like your main inhibitor is just the fact that you'd feel guilty for rescheduling and pushing it back?

    If you think you'd feel that much more comfortable taking an extra week then I would think it's a good idea. However, if you take that extra week, don't lose momentum and slack and relax because you feel you have extra time. Utilize the week fully with the same fire under your butt as if you would if you were to take the test on the scheduled date.

    Overall, do what's gonna make you feel best mentally and most prepared for the exam. You don't wanna take the test and then wait 1.5 months for the results and say “I wish I had just given myself an extra week,” because even if that week doesn't make a huge difference in terms of performance, maybe for your own peace of mind it's a big difference. But like I said, don't push it back just because you're scared or want to relax. Push it back if you think you'll 1) Have a better shot at passing and 2) You'll be able to say “I gave it my all and was as ready as I could be, whatever happens I gave it my best shot.”

    Newbie
    BEC- August 31

    #1592259
    falvio
    Participant

    How many MCQs per day do you guys do during review?

    #1592261
    frankrsa
    Participant

    @falvio,

    150 – 200 MCQs a day during the 2 week review period.

Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 1,059 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2017 - Page 45’ is closed to new replies.