- This topic has 1,267 replies, 202 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by
jeff.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 23, 2013 at 7:53 pm #177708
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
August 14, 2013 at 2:14 pm #437238
thehip41ParticipantAugust 14, 2013 at 2:16 pm #437239
AnonymousInactiveCOGS question: The following information pertains to Deal Corp.'s cost of goods sold:
90,000 Inventory, 1/1
124,000 Purchases
34,000 Write-off of obsolete inventory
30,000 Inventory, 12/31
The inventory written off became obsolete due to an unexpected and unusual technological advance by a competitor. In its income statement, what amount should Deal report as cost of goods sold?
a.$150,000
b.$124,000
c.$184,000
d.$218,000
Explanation: Choice “a” is correct. The cost of goods sold is calculated as follows:
90,000 Inventory, 1/1
124,000 Purchases
214,000 equals Goods available for sale
(34,000) Obsolete inventory
(30,000) Inventory, 12/31
150,000 equals Cost of goods sold
The write-off of obsolete inventory is treated as an operating loss and not as cost of goods sold. (BUT BY VIRTUE OF SUBTRACTING THE OBSOLETE INVENTORY IN THIS CALCULATION AREN'T THEY THEREFORE TAKING IT INTO ACCOUNT IN COGS? SEE ALSO “C” BELOW.)
Choice “d” is incorrect. The $34,000 write off of inventory is subtracted, not added to inventory.
Choice “c” is incorrect. Obsolete inventory is not included in cost of goods sold. It is deducted from inventory and included in unusual gains or losses on the income statement. Total reduction in inventory is $184,000, but $34,000 is not included in cost of goods sold.
Choice “b” is incorrect. Purchases reflect costs of goods sold on a cash basis, not on an accrual basis.
August 14, 2013 at 2:20 pm #437240
thehip41Participant@DJN
When you physically write off the inventory, it's an operating loss. You are writing down the Inventory to FMV.
So yes, on the income statement, the loss on the write down and the cost of goods sold will add up to 184,000.
But, as accountants, we are concerned with what type of expenses cause what on the income statement.
Cost of Goods Sold is 150,000
Loss on Revaluation of Inventory is 34,000
FAR - 83
AUD - 73 92
BEC - 83
REG - 88Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan
August 14, 2013 at 2:32 pm #437241
AnonymousInactive@thehip41, “So yes, on the income statement, the loss on the write down and the cost of goods sold will add up to 184,000.”
BUT the COGS is $150,000 and the Loss is $34,000. If they are asking us to calculate the COGS why would the loss be included in that number?
(I used to consider myself a fairly intelligent person… NOT ANY MORE.)
August 14, 2013 at 3:10 pm #437242
AnonymousInactive@DJN
I am not sure if i am thinking right but your COGS is made up of BI + Purch – EI. Now when you write down your obsolete inventroy , your EI goes down as well. therefore 90+124-30-34. I am assuming the writedown is not yet reflected in the EI.
Hope it helps. Please correct me if i am wrong
August 14, 2013 at 4:04 pm #437243
thehip41ParticipantI think I understand what's going on. Just make a T-account for Inventory
on the left side of the T account
90,000 Beginning Inv
124,000 Purchases
Right side
150,000 Cost of Good sold
34,000 Loss on Revaluation
Ending DR balance 30,000
You have these JE in the year.
DR Inventory (purchases, etc)
CR cash/payable 124,000
DR Loss on Revaluation of Inventory 34,000
CR Inventory
DR Sales
CR Revenue some amount
DR Cost of goods sold 150,000
CR Inventory
There you go.
FAR - 83
AUD - 73 92
BEC - 83
REG - 88Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan
August 14, 2013 at 6:05 pm #437244
jeffKeymasterAugust 14, 2013 at 9:59 pm #437245
UtopiaMemberBecker final exam question:
Data Rescue Corporation specializes in software and hardware disaster recovery. During the year ended December31, the company provided services to its client located in Bedrock, Idaho following an earthquake. Earthquakes are extremely unusual in the area, as it had not experienced an earthquake of this magnitude in over 50 years. While providing services, an aftershock destroyed the company's trucks and generators at a net loss of $300,000. Assuming the tax rate is 30%, what is the amount of the extraordinary loss reported by Data Rescue on their financial statement under U.S GAAP?
A $ 300,000
B $210,000
C$90,000
D 0
The answer provided is D. Can someone give me a better explanation?
Thanks.
August 14, 2013 at 10:49 pm #437246
peetreeMemberThis is tricky @utopia but think about which company they are asking the question about. If they were asking about the client located in bedrock, ID, then yes, this would be an extraordinary loss. They aren't though, they are asking about the disaster recovery company. The data rescue company being that they are a disaster recovery corporation specializes in putting there assets into disaster areas and it shouldn't be a shock that they lost some assets due to an aftershock. Think of it as a cost of doing business for them.
Disaster recovery company = loss on assets
Client in ID (Potato co?) = extraordinary (act of god ruining potato crops)
FAR 02/21/13 - 95
REG 07/02/13 - 87
AUD 08/02/13 - 94
BEC 08/30/13 - 85
Ethics Exam - 90Illinois candidate awaiting his license
Used Becker Self Study | Ninja Audio | Becker Flash Cards | Ninja Notes | Wiley Test Bank
August 14, 2013 at 11:15 pm #437247
UtopiaMemberThanks peetree. That helps.
August 15, 2013 at 9:40 pm #437248
LT-PMember@typhoon44 thank u!
- passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!
Ethics: TBD
August 16, 2013 at 4:22 pm #437249
LT-PMemberGovernmental (External Reporting) question –
When we reconcile the change in Fund Balance to change in Net Position, we need to add expenditures .. if Principal, and not Interest, is included as an expenditure, am I to assume that's because the Principal payment is due but the Interest isn't? (Basically, why include P but not I)?
Thank u!
- passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!
Ethics: TBD
August 16, 2013 at 7:26 pm #437250
CPA2B_NJMemberAhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
2 weeks left and I'm still scoring in the low 60's!!!
Sorry, I just needed to vent.
FAR - 50, 78
BEC - 67, 72, 75
AUD - 72, 80
REG - 70, 85To God be the glory! Forever, amen!
NJ License
August 16, 2013 at 7:33 pm #437251
NYCaccountantParticipantAugust 16, 2013 at 8:23 pm #437252
newuseraccParticipant“House Publishers offered a contest in which the winner would receive $1,000,000, payable over 20 years. On December 31, Year 1, House announced the winner of the contest and signed a note payable to the winner for $1,000,000, payable in $50,000 installments every January 2. Also on December 31, Year 1, House purchased an annuity for $418,250 to provide the $950,000 prize monies remaining after the first $50,000 installment, which was paid on January 2, Year 2.
In its Year 1 income statement, what should House report as contest prize expense?”
The answer is 468,250(418,250+50,000).
I guess I sort of get it but not really. Like what would be the journal entries associated with everything in this problem??
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 67’ is closed to new replies.
