FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 50

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,267 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #436981
    LT-P
    Member

    @Topsya: let me know if I'm wrong

    Dr. Cash $135,000

    Dr. Discount on N/P $65,000

    Cr. N/P $200,000

    Dr. N/Rec $25045

    Cr. Disc on N/R $5560

    Cr. Cash $19485

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436982
    thehip41
    Participant

    @Topsya

    “oh, and here is another one

    I am also struggling to make a Journal Entry

    Leaf Co. purchased from Oak Co. a $20,000, 8%, 5-year note that required five equal annual year-end payments of $5,009. The note was discounted to yield a 9% rate to Leaf. At the date of purchase, Leaf recorded the note at its present value of $19,485. What should be the total interest revenue earned by Leaf over the life of this note?

    THANKSSSS “

    You have to look for what they are asking. They aren't asking for the EIM or periodic interest, it's total interest revenue.

    So they are getting 5,009 x 5 = $25045 Thats total cash received for everything.

    The cash they are getting – the PV of the note = amount of interest

    25045- 19485 = 5560

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

    #436983
    thehip41
    Participant

    @Tanaya

    How are you getting the Note Rec to = 25045?

    The face of the Note is only 20,000


    @Topsya

    I got interest of 18,900 for the first year.

    35,000 * 14%

    Year two is 21546 (14% * 175446)

    Year three is the difference

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

    #436984
    LT-P
    Member

    @Topsya @thehip41 — sorry read the question wrong ..

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436985
    LT-P
    Member

    @thehip

    “I got interest of 18,900 for the first year.

    35,000 * 14%

    Year two is 21546 (14% * 175446)

    Year three is the difference”

    It's a non-interest bearing note .. how are you getting these numbers?

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436986
    LT-P
    Member

    @Topsya when you find out the answer to the $5009 question can please let me know? The numbers I gave you were correct but I don't think that's the correct journal entry .. I can't figure it out 🙁

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436987
    kels417
    Member

    @tanaya I def would NOT do both practice exams last. I would try to work one in before you do your review of all the chapters again to get an idea of where you are weak. You also don't want to be mentally drained going into the real exam. Try to relax on the day before (I know. Easier said than done) so you aren't completely exhausted!

    Illinois
    Becker self study | Becker flashcards | Gleim | self written notes | WTB

    AUD - 74, 75 Passed! (Expires 1/2/2014)
    BEC - 78 Passed! (Expires 2/6/2014)
    REG - 70, 70, 72, 74, 76 Passed!!
    FAR - 72, 66, 69, 67

    #436988
    thehip41
    Participant

    @ Tanaya

    “On January 1, 2004, Dorr Company borrowed $200,000 from its major customer, Pine Corporation, evidenced by a note payable in 3 years. The promissory note did not bear interest. Dorr agreed to supply Pine’s inventory needs for the loan period at favorable prices. The going rate of interest for this type of loan is 14%. Assume that the present value (at the going rate of interest) of the $200,000 note is $135,000 at January 1, 2004. What amount of interest expense should be included in Dorr’s 2004 income statement?

    “It's a non-interest bearing note .. how are you getting these numbers?”

    The implied interest is 14%. That's how you get the PV of the note to be 135,000 in the first place.

    The CV of the note is 135,000. times 14%, that gives you 18900 using the effective interest method.

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

    #436989
    LT-P
    Member

    @thehip .. Well I guess I've found my weak area. Thanks!

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436990
    MurphyNish
    Member

    I am studying FAR now, Becker does not go through the other inventory cost flow assumptions , (i.e. Gross Profit, Retail Method), should I focus my attention on these areas? Likely to be tested?

    #436991
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Daily BLITZ: FAR – Derivatives & Hedging

    https://www.another71.com/ninja-blitz/

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

    #436992
    MurphyNish
    Member

    I don't understand why this note is classified as a current liability on the year 1 balance sheet; Paxton is not aware of the fact that the lender is not expected to be financially capable of honoring the agreement. Are they saying that he will go back and adjust the year 1 balance sheet??

    On December 31, Year 1, Paxton Co. had a note payable due on August 1, Year 2. On January 20, Year 2, Paxton signed a financing agreement to borrow the balance of the note payable from a lending institution to refinance the note. The agreement does not expire within one year, and no violation of any provision in the financing agreement exists. On February 1, Year 2, Paxton was informed by its financial advisor that the lender is not expected to be financially capable of honoring the agreement. Paxton's financial statements were issued on March 31, Year 2. How should Paxton classify the note on its balance sheet at December 31, Year 1?

    a.

    As a current liability because the lender is not expected to be financially capable of honoring the agreement.

    b.

    As a current liability because the financing agreement was signed after the balance sheet date.

    c.

    As a long-term liability because the agreement does not expire within one year.

    d.

    As a long-term liability because no violation of any provision in the financing agreement exists.

    #436993
    LT-P
    Member

    @Murphy he was informed in Feb yr 2 and the yr 1 F/S aren't issued until the following month, in March yr 2 .. Because he is aware before the F/S are issued, the debt can't be reclassified.

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436994
    thehip41
    Participant

    @ Tanaya

    I'm still trying to figure out the J/E on that other problem. I know the J/E that you put isn't right because there are multiple JE.

    The first is to record the Note Receivable, the rest are periodic interest received + amortizing the Note Receivable discount.

    DR Note Receivable 20000

    CR Discount on NR 515

    CR Cash 19485

    then when you receive interest on the interest payment date

    DR cash

    DR Discount on NR

    CR Note Rec

    CR Interest Rev

    I can't figure out the actual numbers though, either because I'm really wrong, or its not possible to figure it out.

    FAR - 83
    AUD - 73 92
    BEC - 83
    REG - 88

    Licensed CPA in the state of Michigan

    #436995
    LT-P
    Member

    @kels you're right, I'm going to do them before I tackle the sims. Thanks for the tip!

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

Viewing 15 replies - 736 through 750 (of 1,267 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 50’ is closed to new replies.