FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 30

Viewing 15 replies - 436 through 450 (of 1,267 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #436680
    mjp44
    Member

    Can someone please clarify the 75% test with segment reporting? My question is if segment that does not me any of the 10% tests (revenues, assets, profit/loss) is combined with all segments of the company and their revenue is >75% of total company revenue, does that mean that the segment is now a reportable segment?

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436681
    Mike1987
    Member

    @mjp44, I think you add only the external revenue of the segments that passed the 10% test to see if it = 75% of the company's external revenue, if it does not at least =75% you have to keep on adding any segment until it does even if they do not qualify under the 10% tests. The multiple choice questions don't even seem to cover this so I doubt we'll see much of it.

    #436682
    Qlad
    Member

    @mjp44…take the 75% of all the segments External Revenue only (exclude the transactions with Sub.)

    The add all the external sales of segments that were included in calculation of 10%. If they are already >75% …then no need to include the segment that did not meet the criteria of 10%….if < 75% …then include it …hope i did not confuse u more…

    my question got lost in so many replies…so just want to ask again…anyone using Wiley test bank…where can i find “percentage of completion method mcqs” …i am still searching… 🙂

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #436683
    marywoowoo88
    Member

    Hi All, I'm struggling with studying fare. I ‘m using yaeger, wiley book 2012 and ninja notes right now. I'm looking to sit for it in 2 weeks. This will be my 2nd time. I failed the 1st with a 65. So far, I skimmed the Ninja notes and memorized parts of the Yaeger notes. I attempted to memorize the fixed asset gaap and ifrs piece but I'm having a hard time remembering all the steps for pretty much everything in far. I just took a testlet of 30 questions from the back of my yaeger 2012 book and scored 50%. I feel very overwhelmed when i'm studying. The wiley book is extremely detailed, in comparison to what was on the exam. I'm having a hard time fully understanding the materials because it's so detailed. What am I doing wrong? Anyone got any advice? How do I re-study for this exam?

    #436684
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ok. So I finished F10 and I'm now looking for ideas on how to attack a review course should I just keep running news and sims and flash cards until I throw up or it's there a method to the madness

    #436685
    icanhazcpa
    Member

    @47CPAIVY What I'm doing is taking one section a day to really go over it, then do some progress tests. Then this weekend I'll just do final exams and sims over and over.

    BEC - 83
    FAR - 83
    REG - 74, 78
    AUD - 76

    Becker Self Study

    #436686
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @icanhazcpa thanks ill try that so I can nail this down by the end of July.

    #436687
    Qlad
    Member

    can someone please help me with Sales leaseback…

    step 1: Compare Selling price and PV

    step 2: If PV< 10% of FV…then Sale price less Book value = gain (recognize all)

    If PV> 90% of FV …then Sales price less Book value=gain (defer all)

    Hope i am right till here…i am confused with the middle one….if PV is between 10-90% of FV…then do what..?

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #436688
    marywoowoo88
    Member

    Hi,

    Can someone tell if these journal entries make sense in regards to this problem:

    1. Wildlife Fund, a private not-for-profit organization, received

    contributions restricted for research totaling

    $1,000,000 in 2009. None of the contributions were spent in

    2009. In 2010, $650,000 of the contributions were used to

    support the research activities of the organization. The net

    effect on the statement of activities for the year ended December

    31, 201O, would be a

    a. $350,000 increase in temporarily restricted net assets.

    b. $650,000 decrease in temporarily restricted net assets.

    c. $650,000 increase.in unrestricted net-assets.

    d. $650,000 decrease in unrestricted net asset.

    the Answer is B.

    Is this the right journal entries?

    2009 J/E Receive contribution

    Dr Cash 1,000,000

    CR Contribution-Temp Restricted 1,000,000

    2010 J/E 650K use to support research activities

    Dr Exp (Research Activities): 650,000

    Cr Cash 650,000

    Dr Reclassification of temporarily restricted-satsifaction of use : 650K

    Cr Reclassifcation to unrestricted net asset of 650K

    Doesn't this mean, that it could be answer b or c?

    Thanks!

    #436689
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ Qlad: I may be able to help you with sales leasebacks 🙂 I think you're missing some detail in the calculations…

    So first you need to determine if it's an operating sale leaseback or a capital sales leaseback…you need this information in determining what the EXCESS GAIN is.

    – if operating leaseback:

    Selling price

    (Asset NBV)

    = Tentatvie gain

    (PV of min. lease payments)

    = EXCESS GAIN

    – if capital leaseback:

    Selling price

    ( Asset NBV)

    = Tentative gain

    (LESSER OF PV min. lease payments or FV)

    = EXCESS GAIN

    After you've calculated the excess gain, you compare the PV of min. lease payments to the FV of the asset.

    Option 1: DEFER ALL if PV min. lease payments > or equal to 90% FV asset

    Optioon 2: RECOGNIZE ALL if PV min lease payments < 10% FV asset

    Option 3 (the tricky one): 10% < PV min lease payments > 90% FV asset…allocate gain where you DEFER gain up to PV min. lease payments (or capitalized asset, if capital leaseback) and RECOGNIZE all gain after PV min. lease payments (or capitalized asset, if capital leaseback)

    For example:

    Say the PV min. lease payments is 75% of the FV of the asset.

    Excess gain x 75% = DEFERRED gain

    Excess gain – Deferred gain = RECOGNIZED gain, which can also be calculated by multiplying the Excess gain x (1-75%)

    I hope this helps 🙂

    #436690
    Qlad
    Member

    @cpaforbirthdaypresent…thank u so much…i want to absorb this info totally…u explained much better than the book…thank s a lot..

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #436691
    LT-P
    Member

    So .. I think I underestimated the Leases chapter. It took me an hour to get through 10 of them! Is this normal? Or do I just really suck at leases??

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436692
    LT-P
    Member

    @cpa4birthday – thanks for that leasebacks explanation!

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436693
    finng72
    Member

    How many other people get discouraged every time they review a prior week's material, like in a progress test? It's like in one ear and out the other for me. I really hope Becker's review is just that much harder than the exam. I just finished F6, so I guess I'm more than halfway there in my review.

    B - PASSED - 80 (11/11/13)
    A - PASSED - 87 (4/29/13)
    R - PASSED - 75 (2/25/13)
    F - PASSED - 83 (8/12/13)

    #436694
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @finng72 I agree there is a considerable amount of material covered in FAR and it's easy to not retain everything from each lecture. This is a great reason why comprehension over memorization is the way to pass FAR.

Viewing 15 replies - 436 through 450 (of 1,267 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 30’ is closed to new replies.