[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 95

Viewing 15 replies - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 3,728 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #526825
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CR7- From my understanding- The eliminating entry would continue until its sold to an outside party and RE would debited and land would be credited to eliminate any intercompany profits. Retained Earning will continue to be debited in subsequent years because the this account would be closed. Since, the parent was the seller and the subsidiary was the purchaser, there is no need to divide gains between the two companies.

    Hope this helps.

    #526860
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CR7- From my understanding- The eliminating entry would continue until its sold to an outside party and RE would debited and land would be credited to eliminate any intercompany profits. Retained Earning will continue to be debited in subsequent years because the this account would be closed. Since, the parent was the seller and the subsidiary was the purchaser, there is no need to divide gains between the two companies.

    Hope this helps.

    #526827
    Guti
    Participant

    Thanks Donica, I know the IS closes to RE,but didn’t we eliminate the gain and restore the land to its original value by doing the above JE? When the IS closed to RE , the gain was already eliminated in the IS. Why do it again next year? The balance sheet was also adjusted.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526862
    Guti
    Participant

    Thanks Donica, I know the IS closes to RE,but didn’t we eliminate the gain and restore the land to its original value by doing the above JE? When the IS closed to RE , the gain was already eliminated in the IS. Why do it again next year? The balance sheet was also adjusted.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526829
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CR7- In an slide I read, the reason you keep to the eliminating entry year after year until the land is sold is so you can remove the effects of the unrealized gain or loss.

    Hope this helps.

    #526864
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CR7- In an slide I read, the reason you keep to the eliminating entry year after year until the land is sold is so you can remove the effects of the unrealized gain or loss.

    Hope this helps.

    #526831
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you can find it here:https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~cchang/pdf%20docs/ch006.pdf slide 6-22 (lower right corner)

    #526866
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you can find it here:https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~cchang/pdf%20docs/ch006.pdf slide 6-22 (lower right corner)

    #526833
    Guti
    Participant

    Thanks Donica, you are the lady!

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526868
    Guti
    Participant

    Thanks Donica, you are the lady!

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526835
    Guti
    Participant

    Donica, have you taken becker's final yet?

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526870
    Guti
    Participant

    Donica, have you taken becker's final yet?

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #526837
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Nope not yet…… I think I will postpone until April. I am still studying. now. I really don't think I will be done by the 14th… to give myself two weeks for review.

    #526872
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Nope not yet…… I think I will postpone until April. I am still studying. now. I really don't think I will be done by the 14th… to give myself two weeks for review.

    #526839
    Zackrampage
    Member

    Ahh rewriting notes almost done though. Its all mcq and audio for 2 weeks till the test ahhhh :/

    FAR - 62 , End of aug 2015
    BEC - 67, 67
    AUD - TBD
    REG - TBD

Viewing 15 replies - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 3,728 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 95’ is closed to new replies.