[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 218

Viewing 15 replies - 3,256 through 3,270 (of 3,728 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #528704
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Like @Jasonrobbins, We do not recognize the expense at grant either. We don't even post an entry.

    @smsingla I don't think it mattera. As long as the expense is correct.

    At work, I use the way Becker described. I book the expense per year and do not use an “Deferred account”.

    The key is amortizing the options over the vesting period, because thats how they are being earned.

    Debit Stock compensation expense – 10,000

    Credit Additional paid in capital – stock options 10,000

    Then lets say options are excercised the next year and total price is 8,000. Lets assume a par value aggregate of $4,000

    Debit Cash – 8,000

    Debit – Additional Paid in Capital – Stock options -10,000

    credit – common stock 4,000

    credit Additional paid in capital – common stock – 14,000

    This is the way I do it and I have not received any push back from our auditors yet. Matter fact, I used Wiley to study for the exam and that was the first time I seen it done like that.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #528676
    smsingla
    Member

    @NYCaccountant, so no JE at the date of grant? right? Thanks for ur help

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #528706
    smsingla
    Member

    @NYCaccountant, so no JE at the date of grant? right? Thanks for ur help

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #528678
    jasonrobbins
    Member

    Would the $240,000 be an adjustment to RE or NI for year 1?

    ***********************

    Atomized Enterprises' Neutron Division qualified as a component held for sale during the year ended December 31, Year 2. The net book value of the division is $1,800,000 while its fair market value is $1,500,000. The Division lost $240,000 during the year ended December 31, Year 1. The Division lost $150,000 in Year 2 prior to qualifying as being held for sale and $80,000 for the balance of that year. Ignoring income taxes, the results of Atomized Enterprises Discontinued operations displayed in their Year 2 comparative income statements for the year ended December 31, Year 1, would be equal to:

    1) $540,000

    2) $390,000

    3) $240,000

    4) 0

    #3 is correct

    AUD- 97 1x
    REG- 81 1x
    BEC- 79 1x
    FAR- 88 1x

    DONE!

    10/1/12 to 2/28/14

    #528708
    jasonrobbins
    Member

    Would the $240,000 be an adjustment to RE or NI for year 1?

    ***********************

    Atomized Enterprises' Neutron Division qualified as a component held for sale during the year ended December 31, Year 2. The net book value of the division is $1,800,000 while its fair market value is $1,500,000. The Division lost $240,000 during the year ended December 31, Year 1. The Division lost $150,000 in Year 2 prior to qualifying as being held for sale and $80,000 for the balance of that year. Ignoring income taxes, the results of Atomized Enterprises Discontinued operations displayed in their Year 2 comparative income statements for the year ended December 31, Year 1, would be equal to:

    1) $540,000

    2) $390,000

    3) $240,000

    4) 0

    #3 is correct

    AUD- 97 1x
    REG- 81 1x
    BEC- 79 1x
    FAR- 88 1x

    DONE!

    10/1/12 to 2/28/14

    #528680
    Quinacridone
    Member

    I test Thursday afternoon. I'm shrieking inside. I'm a governmental auditor, so I skipped the government portion in the book. But I do not know Not For Profit well. My weakness is doing their financial statements. I'm not sure if I should spend the evening working on those, or continue my game plan of doing nothing but simulations and previously released AICPA MCQs. I've taken tomorrow off from work for one last day of power studying. Do you all think if I know the basics of NFPs, I'm okay or do I need to drill into those statements?

    I remember coming out of the Reg exam and breaking down in tears before I got to my car. The test was so exhausting (thank you, God, that I still passed). I'm afraid of feeling that way again, but I suppose its inevitable.

    REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
    FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
    AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
    BEC - May 6, 2014: 83

    Florida CPA 24 July 2014
    (Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)

    #528710
    Quinacridone
    Member

    I test Thursday afternoon. I'm shrieking inside. I'm a governmental auditor, so I skipped the government portion in the book. But I do not know Not For Profit well. My weakness is doing their financial statements. I'm not sure if I should spend the evening working on those, or continue my game plan of doing nothing but simulations and previously released AICPA MCQs. I've taken tomorrow off from work for one last day of power studying. Do you all think if I know the basics of NFPs, I'm okay or do I need to drill into those statements?

    I remember coming out of the Reg exam and breaking down in tears before I got to my car. The test was so exhausting (thank you, God, that I still passed). I'm afraid of feeling that way again, but I suppose its inevitable.

    REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
    FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
    AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
    BEC - May 6, 2014: 83

    Florida CPA 24 July 2014
    (Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)

    #528681
    zieba
    Participant

    Robbins,

    Per Becker, results of disposed operations are recorded in period disposed of in discontinued operations (for current period and all periods presented) so that has a net income effect, net of tax

    AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
    BEC - 74 , 77
    REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
    FAR - 69 , 75

    Dr: perseverance
    Dr: intelligence
    Dr: luck
    . Cr: . advisory score

    #528712
    zieba
    Participant

    Robbins,

    Per Becker, results of disposed operations are recorded in period disposed of in discontinued operations (for current period and all periods presented) so that has a net income effect, net of tax

    AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
    BEC - 74 , 77
    REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
    FAR - 69 , 75

    Dr: perseverance
    Dr: intelligence
    Dr: luck
    . Cr: . advisory score

    #528683
    rvcpa
    Member

    so what is the difference between fv and estimated current value? is estimated current value net of anything?

    #528714
    rvcpa
    Member

    so what is the difference between fv and estimated current value? is estimated current value net of anything?

    #528685
    KNMCPA
    Participant

    Had my FAR exam today and I am already preparing to retake it. Multiple choice were ok, I think I had medium, medium and hard. Left 1hr and 45mins for the SIMS and still was not enough time. I just don't feel good about this, not at all. Guess I'll need to retake REG after I retake FAR. FML!

    BEC- 75
    AUD - 83
    REG - 76 (Expired 2/28/14)
    FAR - 53 66

    Becker Self Study

    #528716
    KNMCPA
    Participant

    Had my FAR exam today and I am already preparing to retake it. Multiple choice were ok, I think I had medium, medium and hard. Left 1hr and 45mins for the SIMS and still was not enough time. I just don't feel good about this, not at all. Guess I'll need to retake REG after I retake FAR. FML!

    BEC- 75
    AUD - 83
    REG - 76 (Expired 2/28/14)
    FAR - 53 66

    Becker Self Study

    #528687
    rvcpa
    Member

    KNMCPA- same experience here! my testlets were med hard and hard. Must've been doing really well because my third testlet was ridic paragraph long questions. Sims I think If I am lucky I got 2.5 of them and the research questions so dont feel too bad.

    #528718
    rvcpa
    Member

    KNMCPA- same experience here! my testlets were med hard and hard. Must've been doing really well because my third testlet was ridic paragraph long questions. Sims I think If I am lucky I got 2.5 of them and the research questions so dont feel too bad.

Viewing 15 replies - 3,256 through 3,270 (of 3,728 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 218’ is closed to new replies.