- This topic has 3,728 replies, 170 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 10 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 25, 2013 at 5:49 pm #182024
jeffKeymasterFAR Resources:
Free FAR Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
FAR 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
FAR Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 25, 2014 at 10:10 pm #528704
NYCaccountantParticipantLike @Jasonrobbins, We do not recognize the expense at grant either. We don't even post an entry.
@smsingla I don't think it mattera. As long as the expense is correct.
At work, I use the way Becker described. I book the expense per year and do not use an “Deferred account”.
The key is amortizing the options over the vesting period, because thats how they are being earned.
Debit Stock compensation expense – 10,000
Credit Additional paid in capital – stock options 10,000
Then lets say options are excercised the next year and total price is 8,000. Lets assume a par value aggregate of $4,000
Debit Cash – 8,000
Debit – Additional Paid in Capital – Stock options -10,000
credit – common stock 4,000
credit Additional paid in capital – common stock – 14,000
This is the way I do it and I have not received any push back from our auditors yet. Matter fact, I used Wiley to study for the exam and that was the first time I seen it done like that.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.February 25, 2014 at 10:24 pm #528676
smsinglaMember@NYCaccountant, so no JE at the date of grant? right? Thanks for ur help
REG 81
BEC 74,65,78
FAR 79
AUD 85 DONE!!!February 25, 2014 at 10:24 pm #528706
smsinglaMember@NYCaccountant, so no JE at the date of grant? right? Thanks for ur help
REG 81
BEC 74,65,78
FAR 79
AUD 85 DONE!!!February 25, 2014 at 10:53 pm #528678
jasonrobbinsMemberWould the $240,000 be an adjustment to RE or NI for year 1?
***********************
Atomized Enterprises' Neutron Division qualified as a component held for sale during the year ended December 31, Year 2. The net book value of the division is $1,800,000 while its fair market value is $1,500,000. The Division lost $240,000 during the year ended December 31, Year 1. The Division lost $150,000 in Year 2 prior to qualifying as being held for sale and $80,000 for the balance of that year. Ignoring income taxes, the results of Atomized Enterprises Discontinued operations displayed in their Year 2 comparative income statements for the year ended December 31, Year 1, would be equal to:
1) $540,000
2) $390,000
3) $240,000
4) 0
#3 is correct
AUD- 97 1x
REG- 81 1x
BEC- 79 1x
FAR- 88 1xDONE!
10/1/12 to 2/28/14
February 25, 2014 at 10:53 pm #528708
jasonrobbinsMemberWould the $240,000 be an adjustment to RE or NI for year 1?
***********************
Atomized Enterprises' Neutron Division qualified as a component held for sale during the year ended December 31, Year 2. The net book value of the division is $1,800,000 while its fair market value is $1,500,000. The Division lost $240,000 during the year ended December 31, Year 1. The Division lost $150,000 in Year 2 prior to qualifying as being held for sale and $80,000 for the balance of that year. Ignoring income taxes, the results of Atomized Enterprises Discontinued operations displayed in their Year 2 comparative income statements for the year ended December 31, Year 1, would be equal to:
1) $540,000
2) $390,000
3) $240,000
4) 0
#3 is correct
AUD- 97 1x
REG- 81 1x
BEC- 79 1x
FAR- 88 1xDONE!
10/1/12 to 2/28/14
February 25, 2014 at 11:29 pm #528680
QuinacridoneMemberI test Thursday afternoon. I'm shrieking inside. I'm a governmental auditor, so I skipped the government portion in the book. But I do not know Not For Profit well. My weakness is doing their financial statements. I'm not sure if I should spend the evening working on those, or continue my game plan of doing nothing but simulations and previously released AICPA MCQs. I've taken tomorrow off from work for one last day of power studying. Do you all think if I know the basics of NFPs, I'm okay or do I need to drill into those statements?
I remember coming out of the Reg exam and breaking down in tears before I got to my car. The test was so exhausting (thank you, God, that I still passed). I'm afraid of feeling that way again, but I suppose its inevitable.
REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
BEC - May 6, 2014: 83Florida CPA 24 July 2014
(Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)February 25, 2014 at 11:29 pm #528710
QuinacridoneMemberI test Thursday afternoon. I'm shrieking inside. I'm a governmental auditor, so I skipped the government portion in the book. But I do not know Not For Profit well. My weakness is doing their financial statements. I'm not sure if I should spend the evening working on those, or continue my game plan of doing nothing but simulations and previously released AICPA MCQs. I've taken tomorrow off from work for one last day of power studying. Do you all think if I know the basics of NFPs, I'm okay or do I need to drill into those statements?
I remember coming out of the Reg exam and breaking down in tears before I got to my car. The test was so exhausting (thank you, God, that I still passed). I'm afraid of feeling that way again, but I suppose its inevitable.
REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
BEC - May 6, 2014: 83Florida CPA 24 July 2014
(Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)February 25, 2014 at 11:43 pm #528681
ziebaParticipantRobbins,
Per Becker, results of disposed operations are recorded in period disposed of in discontinued operations (for current period and all periods presented) so that has a net income effect, net of tax
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory scoreFebruary 25, 2014 at 11:43 pm #528712
ziebaParticipantRobbins,
Per Becker, results of disposed operations are recorded in period disposed of in discontinued operations (for current period and all periods presented) so that has a net income effect, net of tax
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory scoreFebruary 26, 2014 at 12:56 am #528683
rvcpaMemberso what is the difference between fv and estimated current value? is estimated current value net of anything?
February 26, 2014 at 12:56 am #528714
rvcpaMemberso what is the difference between fv and estimated current value? is estimated current value net of anything?
February 26, 2014 at 1:09 am #528685
KNMCPAParticipantHad my FAR exam today and I am already preparing to retake it. Multiple choice were ok, I think I had medium, medium and hard. Left 1hr and 45mins for the SIMS and still was not enough time. I just don't feel good about this, not at all. Guess I'll need to retake REG after I retake FAR. FML!
BEC- 75
AUD - 83
REG - 76 (Expired 2/28/14)
FAR - 53 66Becker Self Study
February 26, 2014 at 1:09 am #528716
KNMCPAParticipantHad my FAR exam today and I am already preparing to retake it. Multiple choice were ok, I think I had medium, medium and hard. Left 1hr and 45mins for the SIMS and still was not enough time. I just don't feel good about this, not at all. Guess I'll need to retake REG after I retake FAR. FML!
BEC- 75
AUD - 83
REG - 76 (Expired 2/28/14)
FAR - 53 66Becker Self Study
February 26, 2014 at 1:13 am #528687
rvcpaMemberKNMCPA- same experience here! my testlets were med hard and hard. Must've been doing really well because my third testlet was ridic paragraph long questions. Sims I think If I am lucky I got 2.5 of them and the research questions so dont feel too bad.
February 26, 2014 at 1:13 am #528718 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 218’ is closed to new replies.
