[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 195

Viewing 15 replies - 2,911 through 2,925 (of 3,728 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #528323
    Guti
    Participant

    Zack, I wanted to review each question on the progress test without having to wait until the exam is over. On the 2012 version you could do it just by clicking on print,but I cant do the same for the 2014 version.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #528360
    Guti
    Participant

    Zack, I wanted to review each question on the progress test without having to wait until the exam is over. On the 2012 version you could do it just by clicking on print,but I cant do the same for the 2014 version.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #528325
    stoleway
    Participant

    @Quinacridone

    Current asset or liability depends on the difference between CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) and the TOTAL BILLING

    Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS – TOTAL BILLING

    positive answer represents an asset and negative will be a liability

    YR 1 Cost Incurred= $1200,000

    YR1 Gross Profit = $800,000

    YR1 Billing= $2500,000

    YR1 Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) – TOTAL BILLING

    =(1200,000+ 800,000) – 2500,000

    =(500,000) this will represent current liability for yr1 since its negative

    YR2 Cost incurred up to date = 2,200,000

    YR2 Gross profit = 1,000,000

    YR2 Billing up to date = 2500,000 + 1500,000 = 4000,000

    YR2 Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) – TOTAL BILLING

    =(2200,000 + 1800,000) – 4000,000

    = 0 no asset, no liability

    Hope this helps.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #528362
    stoleway
    Participant

    @Quinacridone

    Current asset or liability depends on the difference between CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) and the TOTAL BILLING

    Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS – TOTAL BILLING

    positive answer represents an asset and negative will be a liability

    YR 1 Cost Incurred= $1200,000

    YR1 Gross Profit = $800,000

    YR1 Billing= $2500,000

    YR1 Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) – TOTAL BILLING

    =(1200,000+ 800,000) – 2500,000

    =(500,000) this will represent current liability for yr1 since its negative

    YR2 Cost incurred up to date = 2,200,000

    YR2 Gross profit = 1,000,000

    YR2 Billing up to date = 2500,000 + 1500,000 = 4000,000

    YR2 Asset/Liability= CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS (Accumulate cost incurred up to date + Gross profit recognized up to date) – TOTAL BILLING

    =(2200,000 + 1800,000) – 4000,000

    = 0 no asset, no liability

    Hope this helps.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #528327
    smsingla
    Member

    Good luck TaReene

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #528364
    smsingla
    Member

    Good luck TaReene

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #528329
    TaRenee
    Member

    Thanks smsingla and CPAMommyof3.

    I will check in soon as I get home from my exam!

    REG [75] 02.27.13(1)
    AUD [82] 04.15.13(1)
    BEC [79] 05.29.13(1)
    FAR [62] 08.26.13(1) [76] 02.24.14(2) - God is able!!! 🙂

    Licensed NC CPA

    #528366
    TaRenee
    Member

    Thanks smsingla and CPAMommyof3.

    I will check in soon as I get home from my exam!

    REG [75] 02.27.13(1)
    AUD [82] 04.15.13(1)
    BEC [79] 05.29.13(1)
    FAR [62] 08.26.13(1) [76] 02.24.14(2) - God is able!!! 🙂

    Licensed NC CPA

    #528330
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Good luck to everyone sitting this weekend.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #528368
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    Good luck to everyone sitting this weekend.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #528332
    Quinacridone
    Member

    Thank you Stoleway! I can't believe how long I kept working that question and couldn't get the 800K GP. I kept adding the 1,200,000 costs incurred year 1, + the 1,800,000 estimated costs to complete, + the 550,000 estimated costs to complete in year 2). THUS, I could never get the 800K GP. I don't think I'll ever make that mistake again.

    5 days left till FAR. Need to master Pensions and Not for Profits. Also find it funny that I'm struggling some with Government Wide (I work in the Department of Defense as an auditor – but DoD doesn't do journal entries the way municipalities do). I also want to spend some time in Retail Inventory. Then I think I'm as prepared as I can be. I'm so sick of studying.

    REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
    FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
    AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
    BEC - May 6, 2014: 83

    Florida CPA 24 July 2014
    (Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)

    #528370
    Quinacridone
    Member

    Thank you Stoleway! I can't believe how long I kept working that question and couldn't get the 800K GP. I kept adding the 1,200,000 costs incurred year 1, + the 1,800,000 estimated costs to complete, + the 550,000 estimated costs to complete in year 2). THUS, I could never get the 800K GP. I don't think I'll ever make that mistake again.

    5 days left till FAR. Need to master Pensions and Not for Profits. Also find it funny that I'm struggling some with Government Wide (I work in the Department of Defense as an auditor – but DoD doesn't do journal entries the way municipalities do). I also want to spend some time in Retail Inventory. Then I think I'm as prepared as I can be. I'm so sick of studying.

    REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
    FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
    AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
    BEC - May 6, 2014: 83

    Florida CPA 24 July 2014
    (Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)

    #528334
    Amay
    Member

    Basic EPS question (CPA-01203):

    Common stock, $5 par value

    Shares outstanding, 1/1/Year 2 20,000

    2-for-1 stock split, 4/1/Year 2 20,000

    Shares issued, 7/1/Year 2 10,000

    Preferred stock, $10 par value,

    5% cumulative Shares outstanding, 1/1/Year 2 4,000

    Solution:

    1/1/Year 2 Shares outstanding 20,000

    4/1/Year 2 2-for-1 stock split 20,000

    Total 40,000 x 1/2 (6 mos) = 20,000

    7/1/Year 2 Share issued 10,000

    Total 40,000 (after stock split) + 10,000 = 50,000 x 1/2 (6 mos) = 25,000

    Weighted-average shares Outstanding = 45,000 = 20,000 + 25,000

    I understand that the shares issues in 7/1 need to be pro-rated (weighted average) but why does the 40,000 total resulting after the stock split also get pro-rated 6 months if it was issued on 4/1? Besides, aren't stock splits/dividends supposed to treated retrospectively? As if they had occurred since the beginning of the year?

    Please help me understand!

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #528372
    Amay
    Member

    Basic EPS question (CPA-01203):

    Common stock, $5 par value

    Shares outstanding, 1/1/Year 2 20,000

    2-for-1 stock split, 4/1/Year 2 20,000

    Shares issued, 7/1/Year 2 10,000

    Preferred stock, $10 par value,

    5% cumulative Shares outstanding, 1/1/Year 2 4,000

    Solution:

    1/1/Year 2 Shares outstanding 20,000

    4/1/Year 2 2-for-1 stock split 20,000

    Total 40,000 x 1/2 (6 mos) = 20,000

    7/1/Year 2 Share issued 10,000

    Total 40,000 (after stock split) + 10,000 = 50,000 x 1/2 (6 mos) = 25,000

    Weighted-average shares Outstanding = 45,000 = 20,000 + 25,000

    I understand that the shares issues in 7/1 need to be pro-rated (weighted average) but why does the 40,000 total resulting after the stock split also get pro-rated 6 months if it was issued on 4/1? Besides, aren't stock splits/dividends supposed to treated retrospectively? As if they had occurred since the beginning of the year?

    Please help me understand!

    BEC: 73, 81
    AUD: 85
    FAR: 71, 77
    REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

    *This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

    #528336
    Guti
    Participant

    Because you had them outstanding for six months, from 1/1/2 until 06/30/02 and then you issued more on 7/01/2. Ponte pa las consas!

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

Viewing 15 replies - 2,911 through 2,925 (of 3,728 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q1] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 195’ is closed to new replies.