FAR Study Group April May 2017 - Page 6

Viewing 15 replies - 76 through 90 (of 1,619 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1514313
    cpa83
    Participant

    Hi All,

    I am taking FAR in July 17. I have 2016 FAR material for yaeger and roger. Do you think i need to buy 2017 version? Or is 2016 still compatible. Please help!

    #1514445
    Zara
    Participant

    Rice Co. was incorporated on January 1, 20X1, with $500,000 from the issuance of stock and borrowed funds of $75,000. During the first year of operations, net income was $25,000. On December 15, Rice paid a $2,000 cash dividend. No additional activities affected owners' equity in 20X1. At December 31, 20X1, Rice's liabilities had increased to $94,000. In Rice's December 31, 20X1, balance sheet, total assets should be reported at

    $600,000

    $692,000

    $617,000

    $598,000

    the correct answer is 617,000, could someone please tell me why isn't the borrowed funds included in the calculation?

    #1514457
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Shouldn't that be part of your liabilities?

    #1514461
    mckan514w
    Participant

    Your liabilities increased- from what you borrowed $75,000 to 94,000…. the 94 includes what you initially borrowed.

    and they ask me why I drink...

    FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
    REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
    BEC- 8/11
    AUD- 9/2

    #1514463
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think the wording implies that the borrowed funds are included in liabilies increase of 94,000 (at year end) so when I read the question I wouldn't include it on my calculation since the increase already captures it.

    #1514464
    Zara
    Participant

    @mckan514w Thanks a lot !!! It makes sense now 🙂

    #1514466
    Zara
    Participant

    Thanks @automn3 !!

    #1514467
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @zara anytime 🙂

    #1514496
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I know a lot of people are not liking the new becker format- but so far i really like the “skills practice”. it's like a summary but with long exercises.

    #1514536
    Spartans92
    Participant

    Man I have been so lazy this whole week.. The new becker takes so much more time than the old one. Should I skip the lectures and go straight to reading? I only did module 1 of chap 1 so far. Feel ashamed.

    BEC- PASS

    #1514565
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Spartans92 hmm maybe you should do: read=>skills practice=>MCQ

    #1514577
    Spartans92
    Participant

    @auto, how u like the skills practice? I find them to be helpful but they are still time consuming LOL. Just feel like taking shortcuts. 🙁

    BEC- PASS

    #1514583
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @spartans92 no shortcuts lol you need the section summary to refresh 🙂

    i like them a lot, found those to be more helpful than the lectures (they arent so bad, 1 hour max so far). what i've been doing: read,skills then mcq (sims on weekends and writing my notes).

    #1514584
    RunRumRun
    Participant

    @chynablue Thanks- This should help me on narrowing down what to study! I know you have to do this J/E- but I could't tell you WHY it has to be that way!

    Can anyone explain why a write off of A/R will result in No effect on either net income or total assets.

    J/E
    Allowance
    A/R

    Wouldn't the Credit to A/R reduce your total assets(as A/R is an asset itself)?

    #1514586
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    ok so by debiting your allowance of doubtful accounts your assets will go up (you are reducing a contra asset), then you reduce/credit A/R which will bring down your asset… does this make sense? so you are only doing these JE on the B/S

    I think you might be missing the fact that allowance is a contra asset acct (which has opposite natural balances compared to an asset acct)…

Viewing 15 replies - 76 through 90 (of 1,619 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group April May 2017 - Page 6’ is closed to new replies.