- This topic has 1,619 replies, 160 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by
jeff.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 9, 2017 at 12:46 pm #1509585
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 24, 2017 at 6:14 am #1521657
mckan514wParticipantHi guys just popping in to say GOOD LUCK to everyone!!! @spartans the new “equity thing”- is that if you surrender or acquire “significant influence” over a company mid-year- you recognize it prospectively now instead of retrospectively. For example you have 5% stock in a company Jan-July then purchase 20% more in July- then Jan-July you would account for it using FVM and then July-Dec as equity method- (whereas before you would go back and use equity method for the entire year).
Anyway HANG IN THERE! I am slowly weaning myself off… but miss you guys and wanted to say you can all do it!!!
and they ask me why I drink...
FAR- 61-next time I'll ask for lube instead of a calculator
REG-75- Never been so happy to see such a low grade
BEC- 8/11
AUD- 9/2March 24, 2017 at 8:43 am #1521717
Mouzam AliParticipantHi there, for those of you who have attempted FAR exam, in your opinion how do you advise a 1st timer to approach this section ? where to focus more considering April 17 changes. What should be the strategy to tackle this beast ?
And most importantly which core test bank would you advise and why ?
I have Roger books but my account have expired and I am looking at Gliem or Wiley as my core Test bank and might supplement them with Ninja MCQ & Notes.Appreciate your comments.
BEC - 80 (6/9/15) - Roger+Becker
AUD - 69,61 - Roger
REG - 4/3/16
FAR - *****Running out of 18 months soon.
Pursuing CPA since 2012. Started giving exams only in 2014 Q4.
Used Becker earlier now switched to Roger CPA Review.March 24, 2017 at 10:17 am #1521834
AnthonyParticipant@mouzam There no secret to pass FAR other than study the material like you would do with other CPA section and practice. One thing is for sure, you need to know journal entries.
Right now, I'm on Gleim and I refuse to go back to Ninja after realizing just how much of a walk in a park Ninja is compared to Gleim. I guess you can say, I've got used to the complex and over the top question that Gleim has to offer.
March 24, 2017 at 12:11 pm #1521963
Mouzam AliParticipant@Anthony absolutely true. So, you used Gleim on your 1st attempt of FAR as well ? how did you feel about it ?
By the way, are you also studying from Gleim book ? I heard it has a lot of overwhelming info.
BEC - 80 (6/9/15) - Roger+Becker
AUD - 69,61 - Roger
REG - 4/3/16
FAR - *****Running out of 18 months soon.
Pursuing CPA since 2012. Started giving exams only in 2014 Q4.
Used Becker earlier now switched to Roger CPA Review.March 24, 2017 at 1:13 pm #1522063
AnthonyParticipant@mouzam First attempt CPAexcel + Ninja MCQ. Went through CPAexcel lectures then did Ninja MCQ. Right after I found out I've failed, jumped on Gleim and been stuck on it since.
For the book, I don't really touch it much because I've gone through the material already at CPAexcel. All I use is Gleim sims and the test prep that they offered. Currently doing sets of 25 MCQ and sims.
March 24, 2017 at 2:02 pm #1522111
krstnamParticipant@automn3
@Turbosandwich
@chynablueThanks for the help! I think this is going to be one of the problems where I'll just have to memorize the rule 🙂
March 24, 2017 at 2:14 pm #1522129
AnonymousInactiveMarch 24, 2017 at 2:17 pm #1522135
HoldMyBeerCPAParticipant@krstnam I wasn't aware that I helped. I kinda threw you off course there because I myself didn't read the question carefully and assumed we were discounting a note payable, rather than a receivable.
@krstnam I'm pushing through 5 chapters per week in the Roger book. That includes note-taking and lectures. Though I don't think I'm retaining as much info as I would like because some of Roger's IPQs have been way out of left field. Hopefully when I hit the review stage in a couple of weeks it will all come back to me.March 24, 2017 at 2:34 pm #1522140
mtaylo24Participant@Anthony, I enjoyed Ninja during final review push because it takes me a day to get through one or two Gleim subunits. I couldn't imagine learning on it tho, that's where Gleim shines!
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)March 24, 2017 at 2:47 pm #1522146
krstnamParticipant@TurboSandwich – every little bit helps – it gave a review on bonds so that can't be a bad thing 🙂
@automn3 I've got Becker setup for 2 units a week (10 in total) but I think I'm going to switch gears and do the Skills Practice, plus NINJA notes every week with the MCQs. To get an idea though, the first time of studying, I probably was doing 1 chapter every 2 weeks – it took me that long to actually understand the material then I spent way too long going through everything that I started to forget what I had learned at the beginning.
March 24, 2017 at 2:54 pm #1522153March 24, 2017 at 3:07 pm #1522168
AnthonyParticipant@mtaylo24 How good were your averages per subunits before you stepped into the exam? An 18 point jump is pretty impressive. Right now, I've got like 4-5 of them below 75.
March 24, 2017 at 3:32 pm #1522197
mtaylo24Participant@Anthony, They wiped all of my stats, but I swear I only had like an 60% average in Gleim. I did well over 8,000 questions though and another 3,000 in Ninja from December to March, so that's mostly where the increase came from.
AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
FAR - (8/16)March 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm #1522281
jc861ParticipantHey All,
New to this forum, looking to take FAR in late May depending on how my studying goes for the next month. I just signed up for Becker but considering switching to something else. I came across a question for their adjusting journal entries section I was hoping someone here might be able to give me some insight on because the logic behind the explanation continues to elude me. The question reads as:
Dunne Co. sells equipment service contracts that cover a two-year period. The sales price of each contract is $600. Dunne's past experience is that, of the total dollars spent for repairs for service contracts, 40% is incurred evenly during the first year and 60% evenly during the second contract year. Dunne sold 1,000 contracts during the current year. In its December 31 balance sheet, what amount should Dunne report as deferred service contract revenue?
540,000
480,000
300,000
360,000So the answer is 480,000 according to becker because: “Since repairs are made evenly (July 1 is average date), only 1/2 repairs will be in the current year.” 600,000 * .4 = 240,000 * 1/2 = 120,000 recognized current year, 480,000 deferred.
What I just can't seem to grasp is how and why the question is applying the term evenly the way it is, based on the information in the question. Since, repairs are made evenly and thus revenue recognized evenly, and contracts sold evenly, wouldn't a more appropriate calculation be:
1000/12 = 83.3 contracts per year
40% of 600 = 240
240/12 = 20 per month
83 contracts sold in January * 240 = 19,920 rev recognized
83 sold in Feb * 220 ($20 * 11 months rev rec) = 18,260
etc etc
which result in about 129,000 rev recognized in the current yearOR
if we weight the sales dollars sold by month:
600,000 contract revenue in current year/ 12 months = 50,000 contract sales per month
Jan: 50,000 * .4 *12/12 = 20,000
Feb: 50,000 * .4 * 11/12 = 18,333
etc etc
Which would result in 130,000 revenue recognized in the current yearI reached out to Becker academic support and over the course of multiple responses they simply could not do anything but regurgitate the default answer to divide by 2. Can anyone shed some light on how the term evenly, based specifically on the fact pattern in this question, mean to average out the first year sales by 2? Can someone tell me where my logic is going wrong? I even googled this question and it looks like they've been reusing this question since 1992, but no luck in understanding it any better.
March 24, 2017 at 7:20 pm #1522357
AnonymousInactiveHey guys- i am having a hard time understanding this question. Maybe im reading it wrong. Can you please help or point out where my thinking is wrong?
Sun corp had investments in marketable equity securities. costing 650,000. On June 30,y2 sun decided to hold the investments indefinitely and accordingly reclassified them from trading to AFS on that date.
mkt value 12/31/y1= 575,000
mkt value at 6/30/y2 = 530,000
mkt value at 12/31/y2= 490,000what amount of loss from investing would sun report in y2?
correct answer is 45,000
My calc: Now june y2 security was marked down at 530,000 (unrealized loss 45,000) then at the end of the year the mkt value was 490,000 so your unrealized is 40,000? shouldnt year 2 unrealized loss be 85,000? What am i missing?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group April May 2017 - Page 11’ is closed to new replies.
