- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by .
-
Topic
-
So I recently got this MC question:
Which of the following subsequent events could have a negative impact on a company’s debt-to-equity ratio computed using the information reported on the company’s balance sheet for the year ended Dec. 31, Year 1?
Assume that the company files its financial statements with the SEC and that its financial statements were issued Feb. 4, Year 2.
A. The bankruptcy of a major customer on Feb. 2, Year 2
B. A lawsuit that was filed against the company on Oct. 12, Year 1, and settled on Jan. 2, Year 2.
C. A lawsuit that was filed against the company on Feb. 22, Year 2
D. A fire that destroyed all of the company’s office building and warehouses (all uninsured) on Jan. 18, Year 2.
The answer is B and while I understand why B is the answer, the reason Becker gave for why A was not the answer was that “the condition of the customer’s bankruptcy did not exist as of that date” (i.e. the bankruptcy was filed after Dec. 31, Year 1). That reasoning makes sense to me also. If the event happened after the balance sheet date you don’t adjust the financial statements.
However, one of the simulations had a question asking what you should do if a customer filed for bankruptcy after the balance sheet date (to be specific, the customer filed for bankruptcy on Jan. 2 and the financial statements were calendar-year). The solution said you had to adjust the financial statements by making a journal entry, but I thought you were not supposed to do that since the bankruptcy was AFTER the balance sheet date (Dec. 31).
So now I’m confused. I have two Becker questions telling me different things. Do you disclose AND have a journal entry for customer bankruptcies filed after the balance sheet date or do you just disclose and have NO journal entry?
- The topic ‘FAR Review – Subsequent Events Question’ is closed to new replies.