- This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by .
-
Topic
-
In preparing its August 31, 1990 bank reconciliation, Apex Corp. has the following information available:
Balance per bank statement, 8/31/90 $18,050
Deposit in transit, 8/31/90 3,250
Return of customer’s check for insufficient funds, 8/31/90 600
Outstanding checks, 8/31/90 2,750
Bank service charges for August 100
On August 31, 1990, Apex’s correct cash balance is
A. $18,550
B. $17,950
C. $17,850
D. $17,550
A. (Correct!)
Balance per bank statement $18,050
Plus deposit in transit 3,250
Less outstanding checks (2,750)
Equals ending cash balance $18,550
The effects of the bank service charges and the insufficient funds check are already reflected in the balance per bank statement. The bank was the source of that information.
Where in the problem did it say that this recnciliation is bank-to-true balance? It could also be bank-to-book, and if that were the case, you would include the 600 NSF and 100 Bank service charge. Why does it require you to assume what kind of reconciliation it is?
- The topic ‘Bank Reconciliation’ is closed to new replies.