FAR Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 11

Viewing 15 replies - 151 through 165 (of 237 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1763675
    future_CPA_
    Participant

    Good luck for exam!! @gguzman

    #1764469
    AgaCali
    Participant

    @Chandler, what are you using to prep for FAR?

    #1764938
    Pam
    Participant

    any good (free) sample tests/sims I can use? I have ninja but want to get some more in before I take the exam next week and since this is my last one and I'm GD determined to pass I don't want to purchase anything else.

    #1764961
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Shooting for FAR on the 30th. Will be my second attempt after a 74 last year which may have been because of the unexpected insane work week before it. Using Gleim and supplementing with NINJA. Just finished the Employee Benefits unit last night with 9 units left and the material I admit is going into my mind much better than the previous attempt probably because how bad I want to finish this whole thing in June. Going to try and finish the remaining units by next Sunday. I am not following Gleims smart adapt system as that can hold me up on a unit forever with some of their insane MCQs they have. Then after that I will have 40 days to prepare for REG which is already scheduled for June 10th and it is my first attempt at it. I passed AUD last year with a 75 and BEC in February with an 88 so I have until September 10th to finish the other two before AUD expires. Gonna be a fun next two months……

    #1765135
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @pam I have found a lot of testbanks for the cpa exam by googling the AICPA number of a question in either cpaexcel or ninja.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #1765136
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @gguzman not sure if you're still checking this thread, but how did it go?

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #1766408
    faisalzamil
    Participant

    The differences in Beal Inc.'s Balance Sheet accounts at December 31, 20X4 and 20X3, are presented below:

    Assets Increase (Decrease)
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 120,000
    Short-term investments 300,000
    Account receivable, net –
    Inventory 80,000
    Long-term investments (100,000)
    Plant assets 700,000
    Accumulated depreciation –
    $1,100,000
    Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ (5,000)
    Dividends payable 160,000
    Short-term bank debt 325,000
    Long-term debt 110,000
    Common Stock, $10 par 100,000
    Additional paid-in capital 120,000
    Retained Earnings 290,000
    $1,100,000
    The following additional information relates to 20X4:

    Net income was $790,000.
    Cash dividends of $500,000 were declared.
    Building costing $600,000, with a carrying amount of $350,000, was sold for $350,000.
    Equipment costing $110,000 was acquired through issuance of long-term debt.
    A long-term investment was sold for $135,000. There were no other transactions affecting long-term investments. These investments are categorized as available for sale.
    10,000 shares of common stock were issued for $22 a share.
    The short-term investments are classified as trading securities.
    In Beal's 20X4 Statement of Cash Flows, net cash provided by operating activities was

    Answer:
    Net income $790,000
    Increase in inventory (80,000)
    Decrease in AP/accrued liabilities ( 5,000)
    Gain on sale of long-term investments ($135,000 − $100,000) (35,000)
    Increase in short-term investments (from purchase) (300,000)
    Depreciation expense 250,000
    Equals net operating cash inflow $620,000
    The accumulated depreciation account did not change during the year. Therefore, depreciation expense equals $250,000, which offsets the decrease in the account due to the sale of the equipment.

    Hi brethren, I spent a lot of time with this question and still I cant figure out conceptually how and why did they add back the accumulated depreciation for the sold building. Every other item I get how it came about except for the depreciation expense.

    If you guys can help me figure out how did this happen ill appreciate it.

    #1767158
    Sal
    Participant

    During 20X1, Brad Co. issued 5,000 shares of $100 par convertible preferred stock for $110 per share. One share of preferred stock can be converted into three shares of Brad's $25 par common stock at the option of the preferred shareholder. On December 31, 20X2, when the market value of the common stock was $40 per share, all of the preferred stock was converted. What amount should Brad credit to common stock and to additional paid-in capital common stock as a result of the conversion?
    Preferred stock

    5 000 shares @ $ 100 par value
    Issued for $ 110 per share

    Debit Cash 550 000
    Credit preferred stock 500 000
    Credit APIC 50 000

    Common stock

    1: 3 share convertible ratio
    $ 25 par common stock

    5000 shares x 3 = 15 000 converted shares
    Market value = $40 / per share

    Debit Preferred stock 500 000
    Debit APIC 50 000 ****
    Credit Common Stock 375 000 (15 000 shares x 25 par)
    Credit APIC 175 000 ****

    – Could some one explain me the logic between a Debit from preferred stock APIC to Credit of Common stock APIC. I see that APIC is additional amount we receive when we issue stock above our par value so the entries speak for themselves. Now when we convert Preferred to common we debit the Preferred and credit common. Now i see the common par value was $25 and 15000 shares @ 25 = 375 000
    , now the market was was at $ 40 , so it would be 15000 x $ 40 = 600 000
    so APIC is 600 000 – 375 000 = 225 000 ???? are we moving Preferred APIC to Common so we debit the $ 50 000 ?? I cant visualize the APIC entry and its bothering me. Might be a stupid question. Just need to understand this.

    #1768157
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The answer to the question below does not make sense to me. It references that “Service cost is a component of compensation expense, not net periodic pension cost.”. Isn't Service Cost the “S” in PRIUS? (this is NINJA's acronym for the component of net periodic pension cost. can somebody clarify?

    Service cost $160,000
    Actual and expected gain on plan assets 35,000
    Unexpected loss on plan assets related to
    a disposal of a subsidiary 40,000
    Amortization of prior service cost 5,000
    Annual interest on pension obligation 50,000

    What amount should Lee report as a separate line item titled “net periodic pension cost” in its current year-end income statement?

    Service cost is a component of compensation expense, not net periodic pension cost. To compute the net periodic pension cost, subtract the expected rate of return on plan assets, add the amortization of prior service cost, and add the interest cost on the pension obligation:

    $(35,000) + $5,000 + $50,000 = $20,000

    #1768210
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @cm185203 ,

    Reading this question threw me off a bit too. However, the key point here is income statement presentation. On the I/S service cost is reported separately from the rest of pension expense. The formula you have for pension expense is correct.

    Do you have access to NINJA notes or your review course's study guide? Details like this can usually be found with a little reading, which can help you get a handle on things.

    #1768213
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @benj2017 – the ninja notes specifically state
    Prior Service Cost Amortization
    – Return on Plan Assets (Estimated)
    + Interest
    + Unexpected Losses or (-) Gains
    + Service Cost
    = Net Periodic Pension Cost

    so how is this not part of the net periodic pension cost? or at least, what is the nuance that i dont follow?

    #1768232
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @cm185203,

    You need to slow down and read the responses on here and think before you post.

    I just said on the I/S that service cost is presented separately from pension expense or “net periodic pension expense”.

    That's it….it's just a presentation, it doesn't affect the formula or journal entries.

    This question is supposed to confuse you, just like a lot of other CPA questions. Find the reference in the NINJA notes regarding I/S presentation and not the pension expense formula.

    #1768265
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @benj2017 – before writing this question, i had reviewed the ninja notes, the ninja book, and the wiley book for clarification, and i am unable to find any guidance that mandates that “service cost” is reflected as a part of compensation expense on the income statement. The Ninja notes reference service cost – “(NEW) Only Component of NPBC allowed as an Operating Expense on Income Statement” but use “allowed”, not required, etc. no mention of compensation expense. just trying to get my ducks in a row here on the areas i'm unclear on . my test is tomorrow. trust me, i'm plenty familiar with the CPA exam tricking/confusing us on purpose, but cannot find a reference that explains this to me clearly. are you able to point me to where this is stated?

    #1768273
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @cm185203,

    Good luck on your test tomorrow. You can also try google.. Its your friend….

    https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/2018-far-cpa-exam-study-group-january-february/page/4/

    I got the explanation from the Gleim outline. Looks like this is a recent change, are you using an up to date book?

    #1768886
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi all,

    I'm using Becker 2017 and NINJA monthly to help me study FAR.

    I have a question on the investment in equity securities section. In NINJA book, FAR 2, page 81, it says if the percentage ownership is less than 20%, then Fair Value method should be used to account for the investment in equity securities. However, I've looked everywhere in NINJA book, and all I can find is the cost method.

    I know per ASU 2016-01, the accounting for equity investment has changed. The guideline requires all investments that are within its scope to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Is this the “Fair Value Method” that NINJA book was talking about?

    Can someone please help me explain what is going on here? Is the fair value method gone? Thank you!!

Viewing 15 replies - 151 through 165 (of 237 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 11’ is closed to new replies.