FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 41

Viewing 15 replies - 601 through 615 (of 1,267 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #436846
    LT-P
    Member

    @StephAV: thank you!

    - passed all 4 exams on my first try using Becker!

    Ethics: TBD

    #436847
    mjp44
    Member

    Hey guys, question regarding this DEPS question below:

    On June 30, Year 2, Lomond, Inc., issued 20, $10,000, 7% bonds at par. Each bond was convertible into 200 shares of common stock. On January 1, Year 3, 10,000 shares of common stock were outstanding. The bondholders converted all the bonds on July 1, Year 3. The following amounts were reported in Lomond’s income statement for the year ended

    December 31, Year 3: Revenues $977,000

    Operating expenses (920,000)

    Interest on bonds (7,000)

    Income before income tax 50,000

    Income tax at 30% (15,000)

    Net income $ 35,000

    What amount should Lomond report as its Year 3 diluted earnings per share (DEPS)?

    $3.00

    $2.50

    $3.50

    $2.85

    The answer is $2.85 = 35,000 + 7000 (1-30%)/14000

    I dont understand how they get 14000 shares for common stock.

    I calcuated

    10,000 X 6/12 = 5,000

    14000 x 6/12 = 7,000

    = 12,000 shares after conversion of the convertible bonds.

    It appears that the problem does not take the weighted avg of the conversion of common stock. If it is convertible, do you assume that it is outstanding throughout the year regardless of when the conversion takes place?

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436848
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @mjp44

    treat conversions & stock splits as if they happened at beginning of the year…. they will be outstanding throughout the entire year not just from July 1st

    #436849

    So I'm redoing all of the homework and I'm doing very well in F1 and F2 – my confidence was high. Decided to take my first progress test…just 10 questions to cap off the night, one from each module. The questions from F3-F6 looked like they were in Arabic. I remember absolutely nothing from those modules, and now I feel terrible.

    Let that be a lesson to anybody just starting; DO PROGRESS TESTS. I feel screwed.

    #436850
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think it's completely normal for everyone to hate their life while attempting the 9 billion MCQ's that exist for F2! Just rework the MCQ and I have found that by doing the homework with book open i can go see what formulas I need etc. This way it sticks !! but good luck! I'm sure you'll do fine!

    #436851
    mjp44
    Member

    @dropout, thanks. I didnt realize i applied that same methodology to convertible stock. Good to know!

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436852
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Came across this MCQ…can anyone elaborate on it? It's one of those Yes/Yes, Yes/No, No/Yes, No/No ones. It is YES on both counts.

    Which of the following items would be recognized in financial statements prepared using an income tax basis of accounting relating to permanent differences?

    Nontaxable Income – YES

    Nondeductible Expenses – YES

    Both nontaxable income items (e.g., life insurance proceeds from the death of an officer) and nondeductible expenses (e.g., premium cost of life insurance on an officer) would be recognized in financial statements prepared using an income tax basis of accounting.

    So my question…The financial statements still include these items just to show them, or…?

    #436853
    mjp44
    Member

    I pulled this number off of cpareviewforfree…

    The Shawshank Corporation spends $400,000 on research costs this year and $300,000 on development costs. The company believes that future economic benefits are probable and the product being developed is technically and commercially feasible. What amount should the company recognized this period as an expense?

    A 700,000 under US GAAP and zero under IFRS

    B $700,000 under US GAAP and $400,000 under IFRS

    C $400,000 under US GAAP and zero under IFRS

    D $400,000 under both US GAAP and IFRS

    The ans is B. I thought it could be D because if I am not mistaken, development costs are capitalized under GAAP and IFRS if techinolgical feasibility has been reached.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436854
    ramfan
    Member

    @dropout28 I really appreciate your help!

    Who all is studying this weekend?

    PASS FAR or BUST!

    REG - 1/28/13 PASSED
    AUD - 4/1/13 PASSED
    BEC - 5/31/13 PASSED
    FAR - 7/29/13

    #436855

    How are the rest of you going through your final review doing? Just curious what your plan of attack has been and how it's been going for you

    #436856

    @mjp44. nope, development costs are not capitalized under GAAP. they can be under IFRS under specific conditions like feasibility, the ability to complete, etc etc. The feasibility thing threw you off but they're not saying the development costs occurred after feasibility, just that the product is NOW feasible

    #436857
    mjp44
    Member

    @meatball… Thanks. I got confused because i think the one exception with GAAP is that if the costs are related to software for external use, the costs can be capitalized once technological feasibility has been reached. This rule, however, does not apply to all development costs.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436858
    mjp44
    Member

    @meatball… Thanks. I got confused because i think the one exception with GAAP is that if the costs are related to software for external use, the costs can be capitalized once technological feasibility has been reached. This rule, however, does not apply to all development costs.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #436859
    zakahracw
    Participant

    I thought F6(Becker) would be so hard but am happy that I understand pensions and deferred taxes so much better now. In my last semester of intermediate my professor taught it his way and I couldn't even learn much from the intermediate book because of it. On to Chapter 7 🙂

    ~Z

    "Live your Best Life"

    #436860
    Mike1987
    Member

    Is anyone memorizing all these ratios in F7 or just the more common ones..just when I thought BEC was over.

Viewing 15 replies - 601 through 615 (of 1,267 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group July August 2013 - Page 41’ is closed to new replies.