[Gregster]

Just failed with a 60. Looks like my scores were weaker on everything except for Not-for-profit, (go figure). Should I wood shed the simulations? Everything? Ideas? Help!

[ahugemistake]

>Others have mentioned when you studied over a longer period of time for small intervals (like studying 2 hrs a day for 3+ months), it's not as beneficial.

I couldn't agree more. I have been studying since February for FAR and It doesn't help that I am using CPA excel which has 2 huge books for FAR. In hindsight I would have spent the money on a more compact course that just got to the point.

FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79

[Anonymous]

I agree. CPAexcel goes way over the top with FAR. I am planning on covering all of the CPAexcel FAR material in 6 weeks, and even that is a bit “too condensed”, according to CPAexcel's planner lol.

[Anonymous]

I agree. CPAexcel goes way over the top with FAR. I am planning on covering all of the CPAexcel FAR material in 6 weeks, and even that is a bit “too condensed”, according to CPAexcel's planner lol.

[ahugemistake]

goodluck, I really got out to an awful start and now I am finally strapping in as I approach book#2.

FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79

[ahugemistake]

goodluck, I really got out to an awful start and now I am finally strapping in as I approach book#2.

FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79

[ahugemistake]

goodluck, I really got out to an awful start and now I am finally strapping in as I approach book#2.

FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79

[ahugemistake]

goodluck, I really got out to an awful start and now I am finally strapping in as I approach book#2.

FAR - 78*
AUD - 66, 79
REG - 73, 76
BEC - 79

[Author]

Replies