Revaluation model question – Wiley

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #176862
    lbi18
    Member

    My main study source is Becker, but I did purchase the Wiley Test Bank for some additional practice. I came across this question today that perplexes me:

    Veronica Corp. uses the revaluation model for intangible assets. On March 1, Year 1, Veronica acquired intangibles assets with an indefinite life for $200,000. On December 31, Year 1, it was determined that the recoverable amount for these intangible assets was $180,000. On December 31, Year 2, it was determined that the recoverable amount for these intangible assets was $187,000. How should Veronica recognize the gain or loss in the December 31, Year 2 financial statements?

    A. Unrealized loss in OCI of $20,000

    B. Gain on the Income Statement of $7,000

    C. Loss on the Income Statement of $20,000

    D. Unrealized gain in OCI of $7,000

    According to Wiley, the answer is D. Here is why I am confused: Under the revaluation model, the general rule is that revaluation surpluses (gains) are recognized in OCI and that revaluation losses are recognized in earnings. BUT, the exception is that if a revaluation gain reverses a previous revaluation loss, it will be recognized in the Income Statement. Also, if a revaluation loss reverses a previous revaluation gain, it will be recognized in OCI.

    Why is the answer not B then? There was a revaluation loss of $20,000 in Year 1, and a revaluation gain of $7,000 in Year 2. Doesn’t that $7,000 gain reverse the previously recognized loss of $20,000?

    FAR - 85
    AUD - 99
    REG - 85
    BEC - 10/4/13 (Waiting)

    Using Becker Self-Study

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #407922
    lbi18
    Member

    No one?

    I'd appreciate any answers haha

    FAR - 85
    AUD - 99
    REG - 85
    BEC - 10/4/13 (Waiting)

    Using Becker Self-Study

    #407923
    henryv
    Member

    That's weird. My answer is also B. This is the problem with some books. They don't clearly explain the logic of why is that the answer. It's not only wiley though.

    FAR - 92 02/2013
    AUD - 90 05/2013
    REG - 85 10/2013
    BEC - 80 12/2013

    I'M DONE. THANK YOU LORD!

    #407924

    It's an unrealized gain of $7,000, is it not? Which would mean it belongs in OCI?

    Hmmm….I don't know.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Revaluation model question – Wiley’ is closed to new replies.