Was I using Ninja MCQ wrong this whole time?!

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #200440
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    NINJA Question –

    I’m taking FAR on 2/29 and attempted just over 2000 mcq on Ninja. Until yesterday I was working through each topic one at a time and going back and reworking my weak areas and topics more likely to be tested. I was trending 58%, but I was doing mostly “trouble questions” and “missed last time seen”. I was getting really frustrated in my results, but I’m thinking it was because I was doing mostly hard questions. I started using the adaptive learning yesterday while doing sets of 30 and now my trending is at 65% after 5 sessions. I’m starting to feel a little more confident and hopefully I can get to around 70% before my exam. I like the adaptive learning because it does a good job mixing in every topic, although there have been a few repeats here and there. Should I keep using it for the next couple days or keep focusing on weak areas?

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #759941
    Yolonge
    Participant

    Do new question and missed last time seen from custom until review phase and once u r in review just do random mcq. thats what i did

    Materials: Wiley book + Ninja MCQ

    FAR - 83 (Jan 2016)
    Study time: 6 weeks
    BEC - 87 (April 2016)
    Study time: 2 weeks
    AUD - 92 (July 2016), (74 Feb 2016), (72 May 2016)
    Study time: 4 (Feb) + 2 (May) + 3 (July) = 9 weeks total
    REG - (70 April 2016)
    Study time: 3 weeks

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Was I using Ninja MCQ wrong this whole time?!’ is closed to new replies.