[refahcst]

Recently failed AUD by a few points using Becker materials. I completed 100% of the lectures, 93% of the MCQ, and created my own flash cards.

Those of you that have used Becker and supplemented your studies with NINJA MCQ, is it worth it? Do you think it helped you with a retake? I’m worried that since I’ve already done most of the Becker questions, that they might not be helping me as much as new questions would.

[CPYay]

I used Roger and supplemented with Ninja. I personally think Ninja is the reason I passed FAR. Do it. It's $47.

[Track55]

The 4 times i used Ninja i passed. The 3 times it was Gleim only i failed. Nuff said.

AUD - 74, 99 !!
REG - 74, 92
BEC - 83
FAR - 73, 86

Studying for Ethics exam

California candidate
Business and Industry

[C / X]

Ninja MCQ and the books are the only thing I purchased because I can barely listen to Roger (thankfully I needed to give my brain a break and listen instead of read though)

The thing i like best about his test bank is you can break it down, reset it, and cover the exact topics you want to cover which was great for me as I decided to break down every component in my 2nd go around. And you can print out wrong answers if you want. I have only used REG so far and I would say that the questions were comparable for Roger and Ninja with Ninja having more hard questions (there was also a bit of overlap). I also had someone give me an old Wiley REG book

The thing with Roger is you better know everything he talks about because he didn't expand much on REG (giving you what you need to while Ninja expanded a little more honestly and when I tried to read and answer the Wiley test bank they had a bazillion other little details to add. I think Ninja is the best one to supplement with honestly.

But I guess if you want to make sure you pass you could always do Wiley as they have enough detail in their books to make you barely miss any topic…the trade-off is a lot more study time/more detail for stuff you probably won't need honestly.

The test bank runs for 3 months so you should purchase it when you're ready to study for it and go for it and have a test date.

[KSOZE]

Did nothing but mostly MCQ for all 4 tests.

1. FAR – half-assed it with Wiley and watched lectures (didn't know what test would be like) – 59
2. FAR – tried hard and used NINJA as supplement to Wiley – 70
3. BEC – used NINJA MCQ and NINJA Audio only – 80
4. FAR – used Gleim MCQ and NINJA Notes – 81 –> I think for FAR Gleim had much more difficult questions, and this helped me more than using the NINJA bank which is much closer to the actual questions
5. AUD – used NINJA MCQ only over 3 weeks – 81
6. REG – used NINJA MCQ only – waiting on score

NINJA MCQ is the real deal.

BEC - 80
FAR - 81 (third attempt)
AUD - waiting for score 8/23
REG - 09/08/2016 - going to cram and wing it

OH Ethics - Completed

[Anonymous]

NINJA MCQ is super helpful for “restudying”. Definitely take advantage of the ability to be tested on all the material rather than just one specific section. This really is useful for identifying areas you were truly weak on as I personally don't put much emphasis on the score release notifications. After a few rounds, you'll have a pretty good idea of where you need to focus in on for the next go. And don't be discouraged by the trending score thing. I think I started at like a 40% for awhile, haha!

[ShutUp]

In my opinion you need it. Becker lectures are cool and all, but Becker emphasizes topics differently. The ninja questions and practice sessions have been EXTREMELY close to what is on my exam, with the exception of BEC – which still ended up OK. If you have 47 dollars, its best spent on Ninja MCQ.

FAR - May 23rd (24th, Prometric power outage) - 89 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)>⌐■-■
AUD - July 18th - 88 ┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
BEC - August 29th (☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞
REG - TBD ಠ_ಠ

"You better cut the pizza into 4 pieces because im not hungry enough to eat 6!"

[Author]

Replies